Stop the Broadcast Flag Mandate
Coders! Designers! Artists! Businessfolk! Computer Owners! Users/Builders of the Net! Citizens! And All the Tribes!
Right now, the Federal Communications Commission of the United States of America is preparing to hand down a regulation, the so-called Broadcast Flag Mandate. This regulation would make it a felony to own, sell or use important free software tools of communication, such as GNU Radio, Project GNU's software-defined radio program. The issue here has nothing to do with copyright infringement, despite the claims of the RIAA, the MPAA and the AAP; the Broadcast Flag Mandate would make purely private use of GNU Radio a felony. GNU Radio is a program that allows any computer equipped with an antenna and an analog-to-digital card to function as both a radio and TV receiver. Both analog and digital broadcasts can be received and played once the antenna, the card and the program are installed. GNU Radio is not yet complete; as of today GNU Radio cannot receive and play digital TV broadcasts, but within the year, G* willing, it will be completed.
It is important to stop the Broadcast Flag Mandate because, if promulgated, it would set a precedent allowing the government of the United States to directly dictate exactly what you do with your computer, even in the privacy of your own house. It would set the precedent that the government of the United States may directly outlaw the production, sale and use of untrammeled computers like the one billion "personal computers" that have been freely produced and sold up until today. It would set the precedent that the government of the United States may directly enforce that all computers sold must contain both spy machinery and remote control machinery--machinery that would be controlled by Infotainment Central and The Secret Police. Under the Broadcast Flag Mandate, it would be a felony to disable the spy and remote control machinery.
The FCC will accept comments regarding the Broadcast Flag Mandate until 5:00 pm EST, Friday, December 6, 2002. You can send comments from the NY Fair Use site and/or follow the official instructions below.
The EFF has done the major work in exposing the plot to impose the Broadcast Flag Mandate.
In Section 4.12 of the Final Report of the Broadcast Protection Discussion Group, the Englobulators propose that the Broadcast Flag Mandate should create two classes of Americans:
a small class consisting of licensed employees of certain cartels and monopolies, who would be allowed to use general purpose computers; and
the rest of us, who would not be allowed to own and privately use general purpose computers.
It is important to understand Section 4.12 because the Englobulators have claimed and will continue to claim the Broadcast Flag Mandate would not affect private use of computers. But the Englobulators know this claim is false. They know that the Broadcast Flag Mandate would so cripple computers that they demand a special exemption for themselves so they may still use untrammeled computers.
Brett Wynkoop alerts the Ancient Order of Hams about the Mandate. This discussion is worth looking at for several excellent posts from people who understand the Broadcast Flag Mandate would mean the end of amateur work in digital radio and TV. There are also posts from people who simply cannot believe the Broadcast Flag Mandate actually has been proposed.
Declan McCullough asks, "Why have you not written to the FCC?", and Slashdot responds.
The Digital Speech Project presents some of the effects and some of the history of the proposed Broadcast Flag Mandate.
GNU Radio speaks out, including Eric Blossom's clear statement of what the Broadcast Flag Mandate would mean for GNU Radio.
Email submissions should be sent to ecfs@fcc.gov.
Email submissions will allow printable ASCII text only.
Email submissions must be contained in the body of the e-mail rather than attachments.
Email submissions must contain only one document per submission; multiple documents will be ignored.
Email submissions must adhere to the format of the Electronic Transmittal Form for email filings.
Email filings must be accompanied by information containing the ECFS Document Index Terms. For automated processing via email, this must be computer readable. For this, you must use a free-format, computer-readable form, as described below, using SGML tags.
The requested info is to be placed after the text in angle brackets.
The tagged info should be contained on a single line.
Change the text after the brackets.
[Apparently you do not need end tags, see examples below.]
<PROCEEDING>, <NAME>, <ADDRESS1>, <CITY>, <STATE>, <ZIP>, <DOCUMENT-TYPE>, and <TEXT> are required.
List of DOCUMENT TYPES:
For assistance in using ECFS, please call (202) 418-0193 or submit an email to ECFSHELP@fcc.gov.
For suggestions and comments regarding the system design and operation, please contact Bill Cline at (202) 418-0267, TTY (202) 418-2555.
NOTE TO OUR INTERNATIONAL USERS SUBMITTING ELECTRONIC COMMENTS: To enable you to file electronically, please complete the required "City" and "Zip Code" fields. Type in "DC" as the state and "00000" as the zip.
<PROCEEDING> | PUT-DOCKET-NUMBER or RULEMAKING-NUMBER HERE (02-230/) |
<DATE> | FILED-DATE-IN-MM/DD/YY-FORMAT |
<NAME> | APPLICANT-OR-PETITIONER-NAME |
<ADDRESS1> | ADDRESS |
<ADDRESS2> | ADDRESS |
<CITY> | CITY |
<STATE> | TWO-LETTER-STATE-CODE |
<ZIP> | ZIPCODE |
<LAW-FIRM> | LAW-FIRM |
<ATTORNEY> | LAWYER-NAME |
<FILE-NUMBER> | FILE-NUMBER |
<DOCUMENT-TYPE> | TWO-LETTER-DOCUMENT-TYPE-CODE (See list of DOCUMENT TYPES; here, CO for comment) |
<PHONE-NUMBER> | SENDER-PHONE-NUMBER |
<DESCRIPTION> | EMAIL-COMMENT |
<CONTACT-EMAIL> | EMAIL-ADDRESS-RESPONSE-DESTINATION |
<TEXT> | ACTUAL TEXT OF MESSAGE |
Dear FCC...
Example 1 (law firm)
<PROCEEDING> | 97-21 |
<DATE> | 11/22/97 |
<NAME> | Jane M. Doe |
<ADDRESS1> | 902 Snyder Lane |
<ADDRESS2> | Apt. 34 |
<CITY> | Wichita |
<STATE> | KS |
<ZIP> | 20530 |
<LAW-FIRM> | Smith & Jones |
<ATTORNEY> | Robert Smith |
<FILE-NUMBER> | 2314 |
<DOCUMENT-TYPE> | CO |
<PHONE-NUMBER> | 410-555-4657 |
<DESCRIPTION> | Email Comment |
<CONTACT-EMAIL> | jdoe@public.com |
<TEXT>
Dear FCC,
Our client, XYZ Company, supports the local-access station WXXX. Please review the enclosed materials for further explanation. Thanks.
Jane M. DoeAttorney-At-LawSmith & Jones
Example 2 (individual)
<PROCEEDING> | 00-221 |
<DATE> | 6/12/01 |
<NAME> | John P. Doe |
<ADDRESS1> | 123 Kennedy Drive |
<ADDRESS2> | |
<CITY> | Newark |
<STATE> | NJ |
<ZIP> | 07103 |
<LAW-FIRM> | |
<ATTORNEY> | |
<FILE-NUMBER> | |
<DOCUMENT-TYPE> | RC |
<PHONE-NUMBER> | 973-555-7893 |
<DESCRIPTION> | Email Comment |
<CONTACT-EMAIL> | jdoe@commercial.com |
<TEXT>
Dear FCC, I don't want to pay more for my phone. Please remove the surcharge and let competition rule. Thank you.
Joe
Jay Sulzberger is the corresponding secretary of LXNY, New York's Free Computing Organization.
email: jays@panix.com
