Ubuntu Bug Reporting
Canonical does some things quite well. Obviously, or Ubuntu would not have captured approximately 57% of the Linux desktop market share (according to Google's search insights tool). But there is at least one area for some major improvement: bug reporting/tracking.
In a previous LJ article I noted that an apparent long term bug had again resurfaced in Ubuntu 10.10. This is a problem in the driver for some of the Atheros wireless chipsets which essentially renders those machines unusable. What I did not discuss in that article was the incredible frustration involved with attempting to submit a bug report to the Ubuntu developers. I’ll describe that process here.
Let’s say that you have discovered a problem in Ubuntu: what do you do? Well, I went to http://www.ubuntu.com/ to look for their bug reporting system. So far, so good, there is a “Get support” link right in the middle of the page. Click. Now I’m on a page that offers to point me in the direction of free support from on-line forums, or to sell me “professional support services”. Fair enough, everybody expects Canonical should be able to make a Krugerrand or two out of their distro business. Down at the bottom of the page under the “Community” section there is a “Report a problem” link.
We are now at a page that describes how to report a problem, including a link to a bug reporting tutorial. Click. Aha! Now we are on a page which actually has a link to Ubuntu’s launchpad.net bug reporting site. This tutorial page suggests that you search for any existing reports of your bug before submitting a new report. So far, so good still, if a bit convoluted.
Now, as a reminder of what led us here, a few days ago I had found a bug in the driver for the Atheros AR9285 wireless chipset in my Acer Aspire One N450 netbook. The bug being that the netbook would not stay connected via wireless for more than a minute at a time. So I clicked on the search link. Down at the bottom of my screen appeared the message “Waiting on launchpad.net...” Get used to that, you will be seeing it a lot if you are trying to research or report a bug. Their launchpad bug reporting site is horribly slow. You’ll also be seeing this message more often than you would probably care for:
Sorry, something just went wrong in Launchpad.
We’ve recorded what happened, and we’ll fix it as soon as possible. Apologies for the inconvenience.
Trying again in a couple of minutes might work.
(Error ID: OOPS-1752E1761)
In fact, this error message was all I was able to get out of launchpad when trying to do a search on “Atheros AR9258” using the “newest first” search option. The site is almost always broken when you try to use that search option. Finally after 6 tries the site returned 21 bug reports, many of which described a problem very similar to what I had observed, i.e. the wireless connection was useless with certain Atheros chipsets. Doing a more general search on "Atheros" "newest first" (only three launchpad error timeouts) returned 189 results.
So, just to be certain that Canonical was aware of the problem in their brand new Maverick Meerkat 10.10 release, I filed my own bug report: bug number 660864, if you want launchpad to find it for you. A bit of additional research brought to light the fact that this problem with the Atheros drivers has been a recurrent one in Ubuntu dating all the way back to 7.04. It certainly did not exist in the previous 10.04 Ubuntu Netbook Edition. Well, it did exist in the "out of the box" install, but installing the linux-backports-modules fixed the problem.
This experience leads me to conclude that Canonical has two significant areas for improvement:
- They could provide a less byzantine, convoluted, and painfully slow pathway to bug reporting.
- They should strengthen their regression testing procedures to help prevent previous bugs from re-entering their distributions.
Don’t misunderstand me, I like Ubuntu -- I’ve used it for years. However, it is definitely time for Canonical to mature their QA process a bit.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Google's Abacus Project: It's All about Trust
- Back to Backups
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction
- Fancy Tricks for Changing Numeric Base
- Working with Command Arguments
- Linux Mint 18
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Seeing Red and Getting Sleep
- Kernel Korner - Intro to inotify
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide