The Java API to Android's Telephony Stack
Android is a software stack for mobile phones. It includes a modified version of the Linux OS, middleware (which is the topic of this article) and some applications. The SDK is available free of charge and can be downloaded from the Google Web site. The Android sources also are available and can be fetched from a GIT repository, although some important parts are missing.
As shown in Figure 2, Android consists of a runtime, libraries and application framework modules.
Figure 2 shows only the modules that implement telephony functionality; for a more detailed diagram, refer to the Google Android overview page.
Telephony manager, which is part of the Android application framework, provides a telephony API to user applications. It consists of the android.telephony and android.telephony.gsm Java packages. This official telephony API is fully documented in the Android developer reference guide, so I don't describe it here in detail. It is far more interesting to check what important functionality is not included in this API, which turns out to be quite a lot. The current Telephony Manager API is mostly limited to providing phone and network status information, such as call state (idle, offhook or ringing), network operator name, roaming state and so on. The only parameters you can change are network operator name and selection mode, using the setOperatorName() and setIsManualSelection() calls, respectively. And, the only action you can perform is SMS, using sendDataMessage() and sendTextMessage(). This API is rather spartan to say the least, and it lacks many important functions. For instance, it is hard not to notice that all voice-call-related functionality is missing, yet some (platform) applications, such as Phone, manage to implement it.
Not only is this API not sufficient to create any useful telephony applications, it also is rather inconsistent. There is no clear architecture behind the class structure, and it is not obvious how support for other RATs (radio-access technologies) apart from GSM, such as CDMA200 and LTE, will work.
The first thing you discover when you look at the Android telephony API in detail is that it is not fully open. There is a lot of important functionality in the com.android.internal.telephony package. For instance, the Phone application uses this internal API to make/answer a call and access the SIM. This API is not documented. It can and probably will change in the future, and generally, it is not intended for use by applications that are not part of the Android platform—so much for the “All applications are created equal” motto. Fortunately, this API is documented pretty well in the source code of the Base framework module, which can be found under the frameworks/base/telephony/java/com/android/internal/telephony directory inside the Android sources.
The architecture block diagram shown in Figure 2 implies that privilege—that is, platform telephony applications use the com.android.internal.telephony package, although mortals are stuck with android.telephony.
This internal framework module communicates via UNIX domain sockets with the RIL (Radio Interface Layer) dæmon rild, which is written in C as one would expect (not Java). The majority of the telephony functionality of the RIL dæmon is implemented in the RIL library. Both the RIL dæmon and the library sources, along with a reference RIL driver, can be found under the hardware/ril directory. The RIL dæmon communicates using AT commands with either the RIL kernel driver (via the read/write interface when it is running on real hardware) or with the SDK emulator (via the socket interface). The RIL kernel driver is probably just a dumb pipe that forwards AT commands to the baseband processor via the appropriate hardware interface. Unfortunately, this part of Android telephony is neither documented nor open source. There is only a so-called reference RIL implementation in the hardware/ril/reference-ril directory. So, one has to guess what exactly goes on down there on real hardware. The reason this part is not open source is probably the same reason as the one that prevents some companies from releasing Wi-Fi firmware—regulations in many countries do not allow for manufacturers to provide direct access to radio hardware to end users.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Paranoid Penguin - Building a Secure Squid Web Proxy, Part IV
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- SourceClear Open
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide