Using an SMS Server to Provide a Robust Alerting Service for Nagios
I’m a big fan of the Nagios network monitoring system and rely on it to tell me if something goes wrong with the systems for which I am responsible. I have made a large investment in time configuring Nagios to monitor exactly what I am interested in, and this effort would be wasted if Nagios detected a problem, but failed to communicate that problem to me. To make Nagios more robust, I wanted to make sure that its alerting mechanism did not depend on connections to the Internet—this would include the physical connection itself and internal and external services, such as e-mail, routing and DNS.
I have relied on e-mail-based systems in the past to deliver alerts; however, my dilemma was that if I was not getting e-mail, I did not know if this meant everything was okay or if there was some problem preventing me from getting the e-mail alerts, such as a down Internet connection or another kind of e-mail failure. I found that I became uneasy after long periods of silence and felt compelled to “poll” the system to make sure everything was okay.
On the other hand, I felt that if my alerting system was robust and I could trust it, my thinking would become “no news is good news”, and the absence of alerts would mean everything was fine.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- RSS Feeds
- What's the tweeting protocol?
- New Products
- Trying to Tame the Tablet
- Dart: a New Web Programming Experience
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
16 hours 43 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
19 hours 15 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
20 hours 33 min ago - great post
21 hours 8 min ago - Google Docs
21 hours 30 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 2 hours ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 3 hours ago - Web Hosting IQ
1 day 4 hours ago - Thanks for taking the time to
1 day 6 hours ago - Linux is good
1 day 8 hours ago



Comments
please dont use the -noma switch unless you know what you doing!
Hello readers!
Eric mentions the rather undocumented noma command line switch. As useful it is to check if the SMS was send successfully, the option is disabled by default for a good reason.
The noma switch refers to our GPL licensed product called notification manager NoMa (http://www.netways.de/en/de/produkte/nagios_add_ons/noma/). And because Nagios is blocking during alerting, it is dangerous to use the -noma switch right out of Nagios. Therefore it is disabled by default and, sorry for that, not very well documented.
Greetings from Germany, Birger Schmidt, Author of the smsfinder.pl script.
Why not an existing SMS provider?
Wondering why you didn't go with an existing SMS provider and tie in through an API like PennySMS, TextMarks, or Advanced API? Likely could have come in well under the $$ this setup cost.
Re: Why not an existing provider?
I have no experience with these providers, but wouldn't they require your Internet connection to be up? I wanted something that would work regardless.
SMS service reminders
It's amazing what solutions are coming out of SMS, other than the usual marketing ones. A recent case study from TextMagic discussed how a home safety company integrated an email to SMS service for life saving smoke detector alerts. Very compelling.
http://blog.textmagic.com/weblog/2010/02/keeping-customers-safe-with-sms...