More Bash Redirections
Everybody's seen redirection in bash commands, that's pretty common, but bash also allows you to define redirections when you define functions. This causes the redirections to be evaluated/executed whenever the function is called. This feature doesn't really give you any new features, just another way to express existing features.
The syntax for this is simple, you simply append the redirections onto the end of the function defintion:
function testy()
{
...
} < testy.in > testy.out 2> testy.err
Now whenever the function testy is called its input will come from testy.in, its output will go to testy.out and any errors will go to testy.err.
Since the redirections are evaluated when the function is called the redirection(s) can use variables and the variables are also evaluated when the function is called. So you could do something like this:
#!/bin/bash
function testy()
{
echo testy westy
} >$out
out=jj1
testy
out=jj2
testy
This causes the output of the function to go to a different file with each call. The first call's output goes to jj1 and the second's to jj2:
$ bash j.sh; more jj?
::::::::::::::
jj1
::::::::::::::
testy westy
::::::::::::::
jj2
::::::::::::::
testy westy
As I mentioned earlier, there's not any real new capability here, you could also accomplish the same thing this way:
#!/bin/bash
function testy()
{
echo testy westy
}
testy >jj1
testy >jj2
One possible use of this feature might be to put all your code inside a main function and then redirect it's error output so that you make sure it always gets captured:
#!/bin/bash
log=kk
function error()
{
echo "$*" >&2
}
function testy()
{
error testy westy
}
function testy2()
{
error testy2 westy2
}
function main()
{
testy
testy2
} 2>$log
main
Running this produces:
$ bash k.sh ;cat kk
testy westy
testy2 westy2
Since bash also allows redirection to be included on {...} blocks/lists you could accomplish the same thing with the following:
#!/bin/bash
log=mm
function error()
{
echo "$*" >&2
}
function testy()
{
error testy westy
}
function testy2()
{
error testy2 westy2
}
{
testy
testy2
} 2>$log
You can also use redirections on (...) blocks/lists but that causes the commands to be executed in a sub-shell, which isn't necessary here and which may cause problems since the sub-shell is a different process.
If you're wondering if you can override the redirections in the actual call, the answer is no. If you try to override them all that happens is that redirections in the call are executed/evaluated first then the ones in the function definition replace them. For example, in the following:
#!/bin/bash
function testy()
{
echo testy westy
} >nn1
testy >nn2
The output file specified in the call (nn2) gets created but nothing gets written to it.
Also note that pipe "redirections" do not work, but here documents do:
#!/bin/bash
function testy()
{
while read line
do
echo $line
done
} <<EOF
hello
there
EOF
testy
Running this produces:
$ bash o.sh
hello
there
Mitch Frazier is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal and the Web Editor for linuxjournal.com.










This week 5 lucky Members will receive a copy of The Official Ubuntu Server Book by Benjamin Mako Hill and Linux Journal's very own Kyle Rankin. No entry necessary. Check back here early next week to find out who the lucky Online Members are.




Comments
an adjustment
Just in case the script is interrupted with a Ctrl-C or a pipe overflow, two more signals could be treated by the trap block,
trap "
...
" EXIT SIGINT SIGPIPE
Please Help!
Um hi.
I've actually been wanting to use Linux Ubuntu, but I've been having trouble and don't really have anyone to help me.
This guy at school told me to use Linux Ubuntu and he said it's a really good program and gave me a CD that says "Ubuntu Warty". He said its the same as using a Mac. I put it in and double click on it and can't get it to work right.
I also try to go to Start/Add new programs/ and still can't figure it out.
I get really tired of XP and everything and really want to try something new.
Sorry I don't know much about computers.
more redirects
Post new comment