Linux Advanced Routing Tutorial
National vs. International Traffic
Google's public DNS server B is clearly an off-shore international destination. However, one of the root DNS servers, namely f.root-servers.net with IP 126.96.36.199, is present here in New Zealand. At the moment, the traceroute to f.root-servers.net still shows the ADSL path:
[workstation] ~ $ /usr/sbin/traceroute f.root-servers.net traceroute to f.root-servers.net (188.8.131.52), 30 hops max, ↪40 byte packets using UDP 1 gw-vlan-office.e-it.co.nz (192.168.130.1) ↪0.175 ms 0.126 ms 0.125 ms 2 gw-vlan-adsl.e-it.co.nz (192.168.128.254) ↪0.861 ms 0.840 ms 0.825 ms 3 core-adsl.isp2 (218.101.x.y) 22.456 ms 22.298 ms 23.501 ms 4 isp2.ape.net.nz (192.203.154.x) 21.035 ms 20.928 ms 21.268 ms 5 isc2.ape.net.nz (192.203.154.y) 20.689 ms 21.724 ms 24.187 ms 6 f.root-servers.net (184.108.40.206) 26.680 ms 26.059 ms 25.427 ms
This is clearly national traffic, and it should go out via the SHDSL link as per our plan. We can do that manually and set the appropriate route on our core router:
[router] ~ # ip route add 220.127.116.11 via 203.0.113.37 ↪dev vlan-shdsl
A side note about NAT'ing: we also need to translate (or "masquerade" or NAT) the office address range 192.168.130.0/24 to our SHDSL public IP 203.0.113.38. If we didn't, the packet's source IP would be 192.168.130.100, and the replies would never find their way back to my workstation, as this address range is not routable in the public Internet. Discussing firewalls and NATs is out of scope of this article, but to get you going, here's the simplest magic command:
[router] ~ # iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.128.0/20 ↪-o vlan-shdsl -j DNAT --to 203.0.113.38
All packets with a source address from the 192.168.128.0/20 range leaving through the interface vlan-shdsl will get the source rewritten to 203.0.113.38. We didn't need to set up any masquerading for the ADSL path, because there the ADSL router NATs all our outgoing traffic.
Now, let's check the new network path:
[workstation] ~ $ /usr/sbin/traceroute f.root-servers.net traceroute to f.root-servers.net (18.104.22.168), 30 hops max, ↪40 byte packets using UDP 1 gw-vlan-office.e-it.co.nz (192.168.130.1) ↪0.190 ms 0.129 ms 0.125 ms 2 rt-shdsl.isp1 (203.0.113.37) 2.676 ms 2.599 ms 2.632 ms 3 rt3.isp1 (121.98.ab.cd) 2.715 ms 2.680 ms 2.591 ms 4 isc2.ape.net.nz (192.203.154.z) 2.919 ms 3.033 ms 3.088 ms 5 f.root-servers.net (22.214.171.124) 3.007 ms 2.670 ms 2.864 ms
That's lot better. The first hop remains the same, that's my workstation's router, but the second hop is no longer the ADSL modem. Instead, it's the SHDSL ISP1's core router. It also clearly shows the latency improvement—from 26ms over ADSL to 3ms over SHDSL.
Let's remove the manual route again to avoid any confusion down the road and query the routing table:
[router] ~ # ip route get 126.96.36.199 from ↪192.168.130.100 iif vlan-office 188.8.131.52 from 192.168.130.100 via 203.0.113.37 ↪dev vlan-shdsl # SHDSL [router] ~ # ip route delete 184.108.40.206 via 203.0.113.37 ↪dev vlan-shdsl [router] ~ # ip route get 220.127.116.11 from ↪192.168.130.100 iif vlan-office 18.104.22.168 from 192.168.130.100 via 192.168.128.254 ↪dev vlan-adsl # ADSL
So all we need now is a list of all national IP addresses, put them in the routing table, and we're done. But how? Manually? Even in a small country like New Zealand there are hundreds of local IP addresses and prefixes, and the list is dynamic and changes daily. There is no way such a list could be managed manually. We need a better tool.
Michal Ludvig works for Enterprise IT Ltd in New Zealand as a senior Linux engineer. He's got root access to some of the largest New Zealand corporations, but since he tends to forget his passwords, he is, in general, pretty harmless.
|The True Internet of Things||Sep 02, 2015|
|September 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: HOW-TOs||Sep 01, 2015|
|September 2015 Video Preview||Sep 01, 2015|
|Using tshark to Watch and Inspect Network Traffic||Aug 31, 2015|
|Where's That Pesky Hidden Word?||Aug 28, 2015|
|A Project to Guarantee Better Security for Open-Source Projects||Aug 27, 2015|
- Using tshark to Watch and Inspect Network Traffic
- The True Internet of Things
- September 2015 Issue of Linux Journal: HOW-TOs
- Problems with Ubuntu's Software Center and How Canonical Plans to Fix Them
- Where's That Pesky Hidden Word?
- A Project to Guarantee Better Security for Open-Source Projects
- Firefox Security Exploit Targets Linux Users and Web Developers
- Concerning Containers' Connections: on Docker Networking
- diff -u: What's New in Kernel Development
- Build a “Virtual SuperComputer” with Process Virtualization