Google Brushes Off "Outside" Android Devs...Again
The turmoil that began just over a month ago with a mis-addressed email has boiled over again for Google, after the company issued what was termed "verbal silence" in reply to a petition from more than 200 Android developers.
The original uproar began in mid-July when Google Developer Advocate David McLaughlin accidentally sent an email to the public Android developers list revealing that the company had been providing the contestants in the Android Developer Challenge with updated SDKs — under a non-disclosure agreement — while other developers were forced to work with badly outdated materials. In response to this revelation, an Android developer from Germany, Nicolas Gramlich, drafted a petition calling on Google to provide updates to the SDK as well as increased information about the platform's progress, and began circulating it among Android developers.
The current brouhaha erupted as a result of Google's response to that petition. After sending the petition, complete with 245 signatures, to Google's Android Advocate, Gramlich received an all-but-nonexistent reply. The two-sentence response, which Gramlich subsequently posted to the Android developers forum, reportedly reads:
Thanks for taking the time to send this. — David
Exactly who David is, or what his function within Google might be, was not indicated, though a reasonable guess would be David McLaughlin, the Developer Advocate who set the initial firestorm off with his overeager emailing. What doesn't require any guessing, however, is what the feeling is among the Android developers, who have now been brushed off a second time.
Update: Google has released an updated SDK along with a roadmap for future development.
Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.
|Speed Up Your Web Site with Varnish||Jun 19, 2013|
|Non-Linux FOSS: libnotify, OS X Style||Jun 18, 2013|
|Containers—Not Virtual Machines—Are the Future Cloud||Jun 17, 2013|
|Lock-Free Multi-Producer Multi-Consumer Queue on Ring Buffer||Jun 12, 2013|
|Weechat, Irssi's Little Brother||Jun 11, 2013|
|One Tail Just Isn't Enough||Jun 07, 2013|
- Speed Up Your Web Site with Varnish
- Containers—Not Virtual Machines—Are the Future Cloud
- Linux Systems Administrator
- Lock-Free Multi-Producer Multi-Consumer Queue on Ring Buffer
- Senior Perl Developer
- Technical Support Rep
- RSS Feeds
- Non-Linux FOSS: libnotify, OS X Style
- UX Designer
- So when they found it hard to
54 min 4 sec ago
1 hour 16 min ago
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 hour 38 min ago
- Android has been dominating
1 hour 43 min ago
- It is quiet helping
4 hours 28 min ago
4 hours 45 min ago
- Reachli - Amplifying your
6 hours 2 min ago
6 hours 51 min ago
- good point!
6 hours 53 min ago
- Varnish works!
7 hours 3 min ago
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?