Embedding an SQL Database with SQLite
SQLite is a powerful, embedded relational database management system in a compact C library, developed by D. Richard Hipp. It offers support for a large subset of SQL92, multiple tables and indexes, transactions, views, triggers and a vast array of client interfaces and drivers. The library is self-contained and implemented in less than 25,000 lines of ANSI C, which is free to use for any purpose. It is fast, efficient and scalable, and it runs on a wide variety of platforms and hardware architectures ranging from ARM/Linux to SPARC/Solaris. Furthermore, its database format is binary-compatible between machines with different byte orders and scales up to 2 terabytes (241 bytes) in size.
Hipp conceived of the idea of SQLite while working with a team from General Dynamics on a program for the US Navy for use onboard the DDG class of destroyers. The program ran on HP-UX and used an Informix database. As they began the project, they quickly found that Informix can be rather difficult to work with. It runs fine once you get it going, but it can take a full day for an experienced DBA to install or upgrade.
At the time, the team was using Linux and PostgreSQL for development work. PostgreSQL required considerably less administration, but they still wanted to be able to produce a standalone program that would run anywhere, regardless of what other software was installed on the host platform. In January 2000, Hipp and a colleague discussed the idea of writing a simple embedded SQL database engine that would use GDBM as its back end, one that would require no installation or administrative support whatsoever. Later, during a funding hiatus, Hipp started writing it on his own, and SQLite version 1.0 soon came to life.
General Dynamics started using SQLite in place of PostgreSQL right away. SQLite allowed them to generate a standalone executable that could be installed quickly and easily on wearable computers and laptops for display at tradeshows and sales meetings. Informix still is being used for shipboard operation; however, the Naval office in charge of ongoing maintenance of the program recently has been e-mailing Hipp for help in compiling SQLite on an HP 9000. So, things may be changing.
Major changes came about with version 2.0. Version 1 used GDBM for storage, which uses unordered keys (aka hashing). This limited what SQLite could do. Furthermore, GDBM is released under the GPL, which discouraged some from trying it. In January 2001, Hipp began working on his own B*Tree-based back end to replace GDBM. The new B*Tree subsystem stores records in key order, which permits optimizations such as logarithmic time MIN() and MAX() functions and indexed queries with inequality constraints. It also supports transactions. The end result was a much more capable database. Version 2.0 was released into the public domain in September 2001.
SQLite started to take off with version 2.0. Dozens of people began writing in to tell how they were using it in commercial and free products. A few even contracted Hipp for technical support or custom modifications. According to Hipp, at least one widely used program for Windows incorporates a modified version of SQLite in recent releases. SQLite also is being used at Duke Energy and in other branches of the US military, besides the Navy project that originally inspired it.
Since its public release a year and a half ago, SQLite has been gaining features and users at a speedy clip. A quick look at the SQLite Wiki reveals many more applications whose developers have discovered SQLite and put it to use in their software. It even has its own Apache module (mod_auth_sqlite), which seems to be a sign of success in its own right. As the creators of PySQLite, a Python extension for SQLite, Gerhard Häring and I have been surprised to see more than 3,000 downloads in less than a year. Currently, SQLite is the highest-rated database engine on <@url>freshmeat.net.
SQLite has an elegant, modular design. It can be divided into eight primary subsystems (Figure 1), some of which take rather interesting approaches to relational database management.
At the top of the diagram is the parser and tokenizer. SQLite includes its own highly optimized parser generator, called the Lemon parser, which produces fast, efficient code, and by virtue of its novel design, it is especially resistant to memory leaks. At the bottom is an optimized B-Tree implementation, based on Knuth, which runs on top of an adjustable page cache, helping to minimize disk seeks. The page cache, in turn, operates on an OS abstraction layer that helps make the library more portable.
At the library's core is the virtual database engine. The VDBE performs all operations related to data manipulation and is the broker through which information is passed between client and storage. In many ways, it is the heart of SQLite. The VDBE comes into play after the SQL is parsed. The code generator takes the parse tree and translates it into a mini-program, which is made up of a series of instructions expressed in the VDBE's virtual machine language. One by one, the VDBE executes each instruction, which ends by fulfilling whatever request was specified in the SQL statement.
The VDBE's machine language consists of 128 opcodes, all centered around database management. There are opcodes for opening tables, searching indexes, storing and deleting records and many other database operations. Each instruction in the VDBE consists of an opcode and up to three operands. Some instructions use all three operands; others use none. It all depends on the nature of the instruction. For example, the Open instruction, which opens a cursor on a table, uses all three operands. The first operand (P1) contains the ID by which the cursor will be identified. The second operand (P2) refers to the location of the root (or first) page of the table, and the third operand is the table's name. The Rollback instruction, on the other hand, requires no operands at all. The only thing the VDBE needs to know in order to perform a rollback is whether or not to do one.
For any given SQL statement, you can view the generated VDBE program using the explain command in the SQLite shell. Listing 1 shows a simple example.
explain is not only useful for gaining better insight into the workings of the VDBE but also for practical matters like query optimization. The VDBE is really a subject in itself. Fortunately, for those who are interested, it is well documented, and its theory of operation along with its opcodes are covered in great detail on the SQLite web site.
With respect to physical storage, each database is stored in a single file. That is, all database objects that comprise an individual database (views, triggers, indexes, tables, schema and so on) reside together in one file that defines an SQLite database. Database files are made up of uniformly sized pages. Page size is set upon database creation, and valid sizes range from 512b-4Gb. By default, SQLite uses a 1Kb page size, which seems to offer the best overall performance.
Transactions are implemented using a second file called the journal, which only exists when there is one or more active connections to the database. Each database has exactly one journal file. It holds the original (unmodified) pages that were changed in the course of a transaction. When the transaction commits, the journal pages are no longer needed and are summarily discarded. Rollbacks are performed by restoring pages from the journal file to the database file. The use of the journal file ensures that the database always can survive a crash and be restored to a consistent state. The first client to connect to a database after a crash triggers a rollback of the previous transaction. Specifically, when the client connects, SQLite tries to create a new journal file, only to find that a previous one exists. When this happens, it infers a crash must have occurred and proceeds to copy the contents of the old journal file back into the database, effectively restoring it to its original state before the crash. Then it gives the client the go-ahead to start working.
|Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development||May 20, 2013|
|Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)||May 16, 2013|
|Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This||May 15, 2013|
|Home, My Backup Data Center||May 13, 2013|
|Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore||May 10, 2013|
|Trying to Tame the Tablet||May 08, 2013|
- Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- New Products
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- New Products
- RSS Feeds
- New Products
- This is the easiest tutorial
6 hours 4 min ago
- Ahh, the Koolaid.
11 hours 42 min ago
- git-annex assistant
17 hours 42 min ago
- direct cable connection
18 hours 4 min ago
- Agreed on AirDroid. With my
18 hours 14 min ago
- I just learned this
18 hours 19 min ago
18 hours 49 min ago
- not living upto the mobile revolution
21 hours 40 min ago
- Deceptive Advertising and
22 hours 16 min ago
- Let\'s declare that you have
22 hours 17 min ago