Immediate Call to Action: Google Caves

March 21st, 2002 by Don Marti in

Meeting this afternoon in Mountain View, California to search for Xenu information.
Your rating: None

Immediate Call to Action -- March 21, 2002 -- Immediate Call to Action

On March 20th, Google caved in to a baseless legal threat from Scientology's "Religious Technology Center" and removed the web site xenu.net from all search results. (Not just the cached pages, the links, too. Try it.)

The number one site for independent information about the Church of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard and, most important of all, the tyrant warlord XENU has vanished from the number one search engine!

Since Google's web site is no longer an accurate reflection of the state of Xenu (and Scientology) knowledge on the Internet, the Mountain View, California Xenu Independent Study Group will be visiting Google's headquarters in person to search for Xenu information--with cameras rolling.

  • Who: The Mountain View, California Xenu Study Group (This means you)

  • What: First meeting: "Finding Facts about Xenu on the Net with Google"

  • Where: Meet at Dana St. Roasting Company, 744 Dana Street, Mountain View. Then, travel to Google HQ.

  • When: 3:45 PM, Thursday, March 21, 2002

  • Why: To make sure that accurate information about Xenu is available through internet search engines.

  • What to bring: 1. Another video camera (we already have one but could use some more shots)                     2. Your pen and paper for taking notes about how to find good Xenu (and Scientology) sites.

Don Marti is Technical Editor of Linux Journal.

__________________________


Special Magazine Offer -- Free Gift with Subscription
Receive a free digital copy of Linux Journal's System Administration Special Edition as well as instant online access to current and past issues. CLICK HERE for offer

Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Anonymous's picture

Re: Immediate Call to Action: Google Caves

On March 30th, 2002 Anonymous says:

I knew Google was too good to last---the deficiencies cited in this thread are proof of its decay---altho I'm glad that they, apparently under pressure, restored Xenu.net.

Now we'll need a group called GoogleWatch to monitor it for lapses.

Speaking of mediaWatch, kudos to Editor-in-Chief of PC Magazine, Michael J. Miller for refusing to bow to the anti-free speech provisions of the End User License Agreements of Microsoft, Network Associates and Oracle, etc., that "try to prevent people from reviewing or publishing info about their products."

Miller says those three companies backed down when PCMag said it would proceed w/ testing and publishing as it saw fit regardless of unconstitutional licensing agreements. [www.pcmag.com/opinions], March 26, 2002 issue, p. 8.

The glossy commercial press gets bashed a lot for being the handmaiden of its advertisers--- it's nice to see a little pricipled backbone for a change.

Unfortunately a columnist for Network World had diametrically opposite view from Miller's. [ www.nwfusion.com ] PS: New York State is suing Network Associates for violating 1st Amendment laws.

"Inflict what the 'traffic' will bear." Phew...

Anonymous's picture

Re: Immediate Call to Action: Google Caves

On April 2nd, 2002 Anonymous says:

I've been reading lots of hate mail about Google these days, ban here! ban that! ban! ban! ban! They love handing out site death sentences and when asked why? Then they pretend like they didn't hear you!

Google really tells the story of how they view "People" There new front page section depicts us "Computer Users" a bunch of pigeons dropping poop.

No search engine should have, as much power as Google does and I hope more folks will throw some support the way of the Teoma the Google Killer

Anonymous's picture

Re: Immediate Call to Action: Google Caves

On April 3rd, 2002 Anonymous says:

You say "Google depicts people as pigeons," and "we should support the [new] Teoma search engine as a Google killer."

I checked all or most of Google's own links and I didn't see any people depicted as pigeons. But in the process, I discovered Google's News Links---I think this section is great---typical Google: clean, simple, quick interface that's also very comprehensive.

As for "killing" Google---no way! It's search engine that has succeeded far beyond my expectations. If you mean Google should have competition, sure, but it already does---lots of it, but I'd guess in a poll 80% would pick Google as their fave.

The organization behind most search engines including Google is DMOZ [Directory Mozilla], aka, The Open Directory Project. [www.dmoz.org]. Note that it's org and not com. That's because it's run as a non-commericial entity. It's hosted and administered by Netscape. ODP says it was "founded in the spirit of Open Source and will never charge for a site to be submitted, nor will we ever charge to use the data...We are maintained by volunteer editors. ODP powers the core directory of the Web's largest search engines and portals...We are not search engine, but a data provider. We list and categorize Web sites."

Therefore, I don't think anyone would want Google killed. I tried Teoma---I thought it was rather good, but so far I prefer Google.

I didn't know Google was committed to the open source philosophy. This is a relief to me. Hopefully this means it won't be hyped then sold to AOL or MS, etc., and that it won't switch to charging fees.

dmarti's picture

search for Scientology now

On March 21st, 2002 dmarti (not verified) says:

Google put xenu.net back in their database

As of 4:00 this afternoon, xenu.net was the number 4 result in a search for Scientology on Google.

Beaujolais to Google for listening to their users and keeping their results accurate.

brianlane's picture

Re: Immediate Call to Action: Google Caves

On March 21st, 2002 brianlane (not verified) says:

And this isn't Google's first goofy response to an obviously clear issue. According to this World Net Daily Article Google is also refusing advertising from companies that sell firearms, knives or are even linked to the sales of these items. The ads they refused to run weren't even directly selling weapons, they were for night vision goggles, food, etc.

But they continue to accept ads for porn and online gambling sites. Go figure.

Yes, they are a private company and entitled to take whatever action they wish. But I'm a private consumer and I can do my searching elsewhere.

Brian Lane

Post new comment

Please note that comments may not appear immediately, so there is no need to repost your comment.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Newsletter

Each week Linux Journal editors will tell you what's hot in the world of Linux. You will receive late breaking news, technical tips and tricks, and links to in-depth stories featured on www.linuxjournal.com.
Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Tech Tip Videos

From the Magazine

December 2009, #188

If last month's Infrastrucuture issue was too "big" for you then try on this month's Embedded issue. Find out how to use Player for programming mobile robots, build a humidity controller for your root cellar, find out how to reduce the boot time of your embedded system, and if you're new to embedded systems find out the basics that go into one. You can also read about the Beagle Board, the Mesh Potato and a spate of other interestingly named items. And along with our regular columns don't miss our new monthly column: Economy Size Geek.







Read this issue