Work the Shell - Dealing with Spaces in Filenames
In the good old days when UNIX was young, no one ever would have thought of putting a space in a filename. It simply wasn't done—just as you'd never do that on a DOS or Windows system. Filenames were short, succinct and well-formed, like HW43.DOC.
Most of the Linux command-line utilities and the shells themselves have been designed based on the premise that a space delimits a field value rather than being an acceptable component of a filename. If you've done any scripting, you already know this. Spaces in filenames can cause great trouble in shell scripts! Here's a simple example:
for name in $(ls | grep a) do echo "File #$count = $name" count=$(( $count + 1 )) done
To set the stage, I've created a directory with some tricky filenames:
$ ls "quoted" beastly filename sample2.txt multi-word file name.pdf test.sh
Yes, to maximize trouble, I have a filename that includes quotes as well as a space. Don't get me started on having an escape character or non-printable character in the name though. It's doable, but I'd rename it as soon as possible.
Not all the filenames above have an “a” in them, so let's see what happens when the fragmentary script is run in this directory:
$ ./test.sh File # = "quoted" File #1 = beastly File #2 = filename File #3 = multi-word File #4 = file File #5 = name.pdf File #6 = sample2.txt
Oh, is that ugly and wrong!
The shell can deal with these filenames if they're simple enough, and the for loop for name in *a* yields three filenames, not six, but somewhere along your scripting journey, you inevitably will slam into the problem of embedded spaces.
The most common error is to forget to quote filenames when you use them elsewhere in the script, of course. As an example, let's work on a script that replaces spaces in filenames with underscores.
The obvious solution to such renaming is something like this:
for name in "* *" do newname="$(echo $name | sed 's/ /_/g')" mv $name $newname done
This doesn't work, however, and in a most fascinating way:
mv "quoted" beastly filename multi-word file ↪name.pdf sample2.txt test.sh "quoted" ↪beastly filename multi-word file ↪name.pdf sample2.txt test.sh ↪"quoted"_beastly_filename_multi-word_file_ ↪name.pdf_sample2.txt_test.sh_"quoted"_beastly_ ↪filename_multi-word_file_name.pdf_sample2.txt_test.sh
What's happened is that "* *" simply produces two full filename listings rather than just those filenames that contain a space—oops. Let's try a different pattern:
for name in *\ *
That does the trick, but we've not compensated for the fact that when the shell sees a line like:
mv multi-word file name.pdf multi-word_file_name.pdf
it's going to complain that it's seeing four filename arguments to the mv command, not the required two:
usage: mv [-f | -i | -n] [-v] source target
mv [-f | -i | -n] [-v] source ... directory
In this case, the solution is to quote the filename variable:
mv "$name" $newname
As a discipline, it's always good to quote filenames you reference in any context to ensure that when the shell passes them to the command as arguments, the filenames with embedded spaces are handled properly.
This isn't a universal solution, however, because if you're using subshells and pipes, it can be pretty darn hard for quotes to survive multiple steps.
One path to travel is to set IFS, the internal field separator, in the shell to something other than a space, as explained in the Bash man page:
IFS: The Internal Field Separator that is used for word splitting after expansion and to split lines into words with the read built-in command. The default value is “<space><tab><new-line>”.
That's useful for “read”, particularly if you're reading lines of text and want to have a different field separator (think flat-file text database files), but it still doesn't really solve our filename problem.
One thing I've used in the past, although it's a sloppy, crude solution, is to start by changing spaces to some unlikely sequence of characters, run through all the processing, and change them back at the last second. For example:
safename="$(echo name | sed 's/ /_-_/g')"
Dave Taylor has been hacking shell scripts for over thirty years. Really. He's the author of the popular "Wicked Cool Shell Scripts" and can be found on Twitter as @DaveTaylor and more generally at www.DaveTaylorOnline.com.
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
If you already use virtualized infrastructure, you are well on your way to leveraging the power of the cloud. Virtualization offers the promise of limitless resources, but how do you manage that scalability when your DevOps team doesn’t scale? In today’s hypercompetitive markets, fast results can make a difference between leading the pack vs. obsolescence. Organizations need more benefits from cloud computing than just raw resources. They need agility, flexibility, convenience, ROI, and control.
Stackato private Platform-as-a-Service technology from ActiveState extends your private cloud infrastructure by creating a private PaaS to provide on-demand availability, flexibility, control, and ultimately, faster time-to-market for your enterprise.
Sponsored by ActiveState
| Non-Linux FOSS: libnotify, OS X Style | Jun 18, 2013 |
| Containers—Not Virtual Machines—Are the Future Cloud | Jun 17, 2013 |
| Lock-Free Multi-Producer Multi-Consumer Queue on Ring Buffer | Jun 12, 2013 |
| Weechat, Irssi's Little Brother | Jun 11, 2013 |
| One Tail Just Isn't Enough | Jun 07, 2013 |
| Introduction to MapReduce with Hadoop on Linux | Jun 05, 2013 |
- Containers—Not Virtual Machines—Are the Future Cloud
- Non-Linux FOSS: libnotify, OS X Style
- Linux Systems Administrator
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- Lock-Free Multi-Producer Multi-Consumer Queue on Ring Buffer
- Senior Perl Developer
- Technical Support Rep
- UX Designer
- Introduction to MapReduce with Hadoop on Linux
- RSS Feeds
- Bought photoshop CS5 for developing a website :(
1 hour 52 min ago - What the author describes
3 hours 18 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
7 hours 28 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
8 hours 13 min ago - Didn't read
8 hours 24 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
8 hours 29 min ago - Poul-Henning Kamp: welcome to
10 hours 39 min ago - This has already been done
10 hours 40 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
11 hours 25 min ago - Welcome to 1998
12 hours 13 min ago
Featured Jobs
| Linux Systems Administrator | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Senior Perl Developer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Technical Support Rep | Houston and Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| UX Designer | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
| Web & UI Developer (JavaScript & j Query) | Austin, Texas | Host Gator |
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?




Comments
Why not using the IFS??
I've gone through this dilemma in recent project and found using IFS simple and very effective,
Is this possible for all cases and the one mentioned in the article above?
IFS_backup=$IFS
IFS=$(echo -en "\n\b")
#do what ever you want ... then restore the original variable
IFS=$IFSBU
--
Salah Aldeen
Regards,
The problem, internal shell conversions
To manage this problem I had been using code like this,
for filename in *; do aux=$filename/; LS[${#LS[@]}]=${aux%/}; done
...
rm "${LS[24]}", as example
The catch here is to avoid the conversions taken by the shell when you access to the content of a variable, the trick is to append to the variable a character, trying to make the shell guess that it's a string, and then you can gain access without infamous conversions, but at later you ougth to remove the char in order to use it as a filename.
The chars candidates for this job are NUll, $'/0, and "/".
s/find -print/find -print0/ ?
Dave, did you mean '-print0' as opposed to '-print'? While both kind of make sense, when paired with 'xargs -0' I think the former makes *more* sense.
With respect to spaces, I usually don't bother dealing with them unless I *know* that they'll be there (e.g. I'm manipulating data that non-geek customers access via a Samba share and put plenty of weird characters in).
One of the other solutions I've considered, but not really had to use yet, is to switch to Perl or Python for these particular use-cases, given they handle escaping of spaces somewhat better.
It's something I'd rather not do given I'm more familiar with Bash than either of the above, but it may be the lease bad solution, even if I do have to dig up my text books to work out how to do something that would be trivial in Bash.
--
Regards,
Matthew Cengia