Web Application Testing with Selenium
This is actually the Selenium Core code. The way Selenium “injects” itself into the Web page can vary (more on this later); however, when Selenium Core is used directly, this code has to be added to your HTML manually. Naturally, it requires access to the Web server that's serving the page, which is not always available. The biggest advantage of this mode is that it will work reliably with all browsers—something that other methods of using Selenium cannot guarantee.
Nevertheless, standalone Selenium Core is rarely used these days and may be deprecated in the future, so for the rest of this article, I concentrate on Selenium RC and IDE, which are the preferred methods of using Selenium.
Contrary to Selenium RC, for which you write your test cases using some programming language, the Selenium IDE allows you to develop your Selenium test cases in a graphical environment by simply interacting with the Web application under test as your users would. It probably is the easiest way to develop test cases. Selenium IDE is implemented as a Firefox plugin. The IDE not only records the Selenium commands that correspond to your interactions with the browser, but it also allows you to modify their arguments and add more commands to the recorded test case. The plugin has a context menu that allows you to select a UI (User Interface) element from the browser's currently displayed page and then select a Selenium command from a drop-down list, automatically adding relevant parameters according to the context of the selected UI element.
After installation, the IDE is accessible via Tools→Selenium IDE in the Firefox menu. To illustrate the IDE functionality, let's re-create the above Google search test case using the IDE. In order to do this, you simply should run the IDE, check that the record button is on, open the http://www.google.com page, type selenium and click Google Search. As you type, the Selenium IDE captures what you do (Figure 3).
Selenium recorded the manually entered commands. This test case now can be played back using the IDE, saved as HTML or exported in a variety of formats, including ready-to-run code snippets for Selenium RC. The exported test case looks very similar to the handwritten code above, although in this case, I exported it in Python in order to demonstrate some of Selenium's capabilities:
from selenium import selenium import unittest, time, re class googletest(unittest.TestCase): def setUp(self): self.verificationErrors =  self.selenium = selenium( "localhost", 4444, "*chrome", "http://www.google.com/") self.selenium.start() def test_googletest(self): sel = self.selenium sel.open("/") sel.type("q", "selenium") sel.click("btnG") def tearDown(self): self.selenium.stop() self.assertEqual(, self.verificationErrors) if __name__ == "__main__": unittest.main()
Note that in addition to using a unit-testing framework, the code above differs from the Perl example by using the "*chrome" browser string instead of "*firefox". This is one of the most confusing issues with Selenium, and it deserves a section of its own here.
Before I go into the really confusing details of this parameter, it is important to understand that even though Selenium is not a new project, it still is under active development, and as it sometimes happens with open-source projects, some of the development effort that went into introducing new features might have been better spent debugging old ones and making it more stable. As a result, in certain configurations, some Selenium features might not work as expected, and others may not work at all.
The browser string parameter not only specifies the browser Selenium will work with, but also the method Selenium uses to control the browser and the mode of communication between the Selenium server and the Selenium Core running inside the browser. And, yes, there are multiple modes for some browsers. Not all modes are implemented for every browser, and some Selenium commands will not work with certain modes. To add to the confusion, the default modes sometimes change between different Selenium versions. In Selenium version 1.0 "*firefox" is an alias for "*chrome" and "*iexplore" for "*iehta".
As you can see, even though it is often praised for its multiple browser testing capability, in reality, browsers other than Firefox and Internet Explorer are poorly supported. At the end of the day, if you have to ensure that your Web site looks and works correctly under all important browsers, your best bet may be a browser screenshot tool, such as BrowserShots or BrowserSeal. BrowserShots is a Web-based screenshot service supporting a wide range of browsers that unfortunately suffers from long response times. BrowserSeal, on the other hand, is a standalone application running on your PC optimized for Web site screenshots. It produces screenshots in a few seconds, compared with a few minutes for BrowserShots; however, there is only a Windows version available at the time of this writing.
Webinar: 8 Signs You’re Beyond Cron
11am CDT, April 29th
Join Linux Journal and Pat Cameron, Director of Automation Technology at HelpSystems, as they discuss the eight primary advantages of moving beyond cron job scheduling. In this webinar, you’ll learn about integrating cron with an enterprise scheduler.Join us!
Web Development News
|Android Candy: Intercoms||Apr 23, 2015|
|"No Reboot" Kernel Patching - And Why You Should Care||Apr 22, 2015|
|Return of the Mac||Apr 20, 2015|
|DevOps: Better Than the Sum of Its Parts||Apr 20, 2015|
|Play for Me, Jarvis||Apr 16, 2015|
|Drupageddon: SQL Injection, Database Abstraction and Hundreds of Thousands of Web Sites||Apr 15, 2015|
- Tips for Optimizing Linux Memory Usage
- "No Reboot" Kernel Patching - And Why You Should Care
- DevOps: Better Than the Sum of Its Parts
- Return of the Mac
- Android Candy: Intercoms
- Drupageddon: SQL Injection, Database Abstraction and Hundreds of Thousands of Web Sites
- Designing Foils with XFLR5
- Non-Linux FOSS: .NET?
- Play for Me, Jarvis