LDAP: Replacing Exchange Revisited
LDAP can occupy numerous places in an IT infrastructure. For example, you can migrate Network Information Services (NIS) to LDAP and many Legacy UNIX centric organization have done just that. While the NIS migration model serves as one excellent example, many others exist. Most recently, I saw LDAP used as a simple white page - name and address - directory service. I consider that under utilizing LDAP.
Just a simple note: NIS is client-server directory service protocol for distributing system configuration information such as user and host names between computers on a computer network. NIS uses a flat database structure while LDAP as we've discussed uses a hierarchical structure.
My first exposure to LDAP occurred in 1999. While on a consulting assignment at one of the major telecommunication firms, I saw my client migrating from their own email system to MS Exchange. Someone convinced them that their own system running on their own mainframes would fail on midnight January 1, 2000.
After the migration, it dawned on the the IT management folks that they forgot to consider their 30,000 UNIX users. You can imagine the mess. Our friends in Redmond did not produce a UNIX version of Outlook.
Later that year, I rounded up a few developers and orchestrated the creation of a UNIX clone which worked with Exchange. We used Collaboration Data Objects (CDO)and built a proxy to run from a UNIX client to Exchange. The main goal of the project focused on calendar events.
While interest in the client circulated from one Fortune 50 company to many others, Exchange administrators feared having "rogue" technology on their networks.
As a product, our client failed, but in the process of marketing and accepting requests we discovered that we could build a server that could function side by side with Exchange. We also discovered an LDAP directory running like white pages within Exchange.
Note: In the next segment, we'll discuss ObjectClasses, attributes and schemas, but not now.
Suffice it to say, Exchange used standard ObjectClasses and attributes within its directory. We did not find it a stretch to duplicate those LDAP objects. Ultimately, the Exchange 5.5 directory morphed into AD - the current enterprise directory from Redmond. Still, in building a product people would buy, we found LDAP a common crossover thread.
So, what's the point of this story? Plain and simple, the Open Source Community has had the makings of products widely used in enterprises today. We just have not taken advantage of our resources.
Now, consider this a short prelude to deeper aspects of the LDAP protocol. If we want to move our Open Source LDAP products (OpenLDAP and Fedora Directory Server) deeper into business we need to first understand the basic building materials and then start to innovate.
Our next adventure begins with schemas and the objects that make work. Speak to you soon.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Returning Values from Bash Functions
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide