Ruby and .NET - how will they taste together?

June 20th, 2006 by Pat Eyler

Wow, big news to start off my new blog. The Gardens Point GP Ruby .NET development team has announced an initial beta version of their system.

At this point, they claim that it can compile Ruby source into verifiable .Net v2.0 assembly, or it can run Ruby code directly in a compile, load and execute cycle. They do warn that their implementation is not yet complete, although it does pass everything in samples/test.rb (I wonder if they're using the Rubicon/Rubytests stuff for further testing?).

Source code for their this release is available here. This software is being released as free software, so there should be ample opportunity to work with other development groups.

All this prompts an interesting set of questions though:

  • There are now several groups working on Ruby implementations (JRuby, YARV, metaruby, etc.), how much of this is wasted duplication and how can the various groups help one another?
  • Which of these is going to gain widespread traction in the Ruby community, and how will that affect the projects that don't?
  • Some of the projects working in this space seem to suffer from the Not Invented Here syndrome, what needs to be done to better communicate the goals and progress of all these projects to the comunity to help reduce needless duplication?

__________________________
--
-pate
http://on-ruby.blogspot.com

Special Magazine Offer -- 2 Free Trial Issues!
Receive 2 free trial issues of Linux Journal as well as instant online access to current and past issues. There's NO RISK and NO OBLIGATION to buy. CLICK HERE for offer

Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.

Sorry, offer available in the US only. International orders, click here.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

linux

On October 2nd, 2007 enigma download (not verified) says:

threads I Can use GNU/Linux? with . Best regards.

More Ruby

On June 21st, 2006 Megatux (not verified) says:

Don't forget other future implementations, in hlvm ( http://hlvm.org/docs/ReleasePlans.html#f0_4 ) and even in the NekoVM

HLVM

On June 21st, 2006 Pat Eyler says:

Megatux,
thanks for pointing these out. I'd not seen them before, but they're certainly something I'll keep an eye on going forward.

I'd be interested in seeing how much they interact with the other Ruby implmentations, especially the main C based implementation.

--
-pate
http://on-ruby.blogspot.com

__________________________

--
-pate
http://on-ruby.blogspot.com

Unique Perspectives

On June 20th, 2006 Charles Oliver Nutter (not verified) says:

Greetings from the JRuby team! We believe that all these different implementations can only help the Ruby world. YARV is intended to become Ruby 2.0, and its implementation challenges have led to many questionable features of Ruby 1.8 potentially being cut. metaruby is an attempt to write Ruby in Ruby, but it is mostly dependent on a Ruby-to-C compiler which cannot support core interpreter features as yet. There are also several other .NET-related projects at varying stages of completion. We welcome all comers.

JRuby is becoming very mature at this point. We can run a number of core Ruby apps out-of-the-box. We can run large parts of Rails, and more complicated apps every day. We are working toward speed parity with C Ruby before we start working on compilation...and all bets are off afterwards. JRuby is without a doubt the furthest along in creating a complete Ruby runtime, and we believe both the Ruby and Java worlds will benefit from it. The other important detail of all these projects is that they are open source; we keep an eye on all projects to see if they have creative ways to solve problems we haven't tackled yet. Some projects are tackling compilation early on, which we have delayed until we know JRuby is correct. Some projects just bridge the C implementation, binding types in interesting ways. All viewpoints are useful.

What would help out all these projects most is hiring on full-time developers to improve them. The potential for Ruby on Java or .NET is tremendous, and yet very few of these project have any official backing or funding. Hopefully that will change in the future.

Another JRuby comment

On June 21st, 2006 Thomas E Enebo (not verified) says:

Another comment from JRuby-land. As an alternate implementation of Ruby on the JVM, JRuby also adds nice Java integration features. This allows the mixture of Java and Ruby in various interesting ways (like write a DSL in Ruby and call it from your legacy Java application). We see this as a value add for Ruby programmers and it gives Java programmers another avenue to solve a problem. I expect the .NET implementation has the same benefits.

Duplication of effort only makes sense if we had any plans to work on another implementation. I am not .NET guy and I think the C Ruby implementation has enough hands in it already. Creating a second implementation of a language also helps find bugs in the first implementation. We have found a few bugs in Ruby by working on JRuby. Plus if we have three (or more) impls of Ruby, then perhaps it may even generate a formal language specification...

Featured Videos

Linux HOWTO: Video Editing Magic with ffmpeg

Non-linear video editing tools are great, but they're not always the best tool for the job. This is where a powerful tool like ffmpeg becomes useful. This tutorial by Elliot Isaacson covers the basics of transcoding video, as well as more advanced tricks like creating animations, screen captures, and slow motion effects.

Review: HP 2133 Mini-Note

Shawn Powers reviews the HP Mini-Note portable computer.

Thanks to our sponsor: Silicon Mechanics

Silicon Mechanics is a leading manufacturer of rackmount servers, storage, and high performance computing hardware. The best warranty offerings available are backed by experts dedicated to customer satisfaction.

more

From the Magazine

August 2008, #172

There's nuttin like a Cool Project to give you some relief from the summer heat, so get out your parka cuz we got a bunch of em. First up is the BUG, not a bug, The BUG. It's got a GPS, camera and more, in a hand-sized package that's user programmable. The BUG does everything. It's both a floor wax and a dessert topping. Get one now. Need a software version of a Swiss Army knife? Take a look at Billix, and don't leave home without it. Then, chew on this one, an X server on a Gumstix device driving an E-Ink display. Need more storage? How about 16 Terabytes? Can do.

And, of course, we have the usual cast of characters: Marcel, Reuven, Dave, Kyle, Doc, plus the new kid on the block Shawn Powers. But it doesn't stop there: build a MythTV box on a budget, build your own GIS system, set up the tools to monitor your enterprise and more. Finally, remember The War of the Worlds? Now you can play too.

Read this issue