Year Without DRM
January 2nd, 2009 by Carlie Fairchild in
It's time for New Year resolutions and what better than to resolve to not purchase media 'protected' by DRM? Many of us already follow this rule but by pledging this publicly we can educate the masses.
"It is my New Year's Resolution to refuse to purchase any media which is protected by a digital rights management system. DRM restricts me from controlling my media and my devices. If I do not have full control of my device, I do not own it. Therefore, I cannot in good conscience purchase anything which is restricted by DRM."
YearWithoutDRM.com by Linux Journal subscriber and friend Colin Dean is a site asking the public to resolve to only purchase content which you control for devices you control. We've pledged, have you?
__________________________
Carlie Fairchild is the publisher of Linux Journal.
Special Magazine Offer -- Free Gift with Subscription
Receive a free digital copy of Linux Journal's System Administration Special Edition as well as instant online access to current and past issues. CLICK HERE for offer
Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Post to TwitterSubscribe now!
The Latest
Newsletter
Tech Tip Videos
Recently Popular
From the Magazine
December 2009, #188
If last month's Infrastrucuture issue was too "big" for you then try on this month's Embedded issue. Find out how to use Player for programming mobile robots, build a humidity controller for your root cellar, find out how to reduce the boot time of your embedded system, and if you're new to embedded systems find out the basics that go into one. You can also read about the Beagle Board, the Mesh Potato and a spate of other interestingly named items. And along with our regular columns don't miss our new monthly column: Economy Size Geek.
I think that would include
On January 10th, 2009 Anonymous (not verified) says:
I think that would include any "legal" DVD rentals or purchases (gotta love CSS encryption ;) ), so sign me up! Of course, I've already been DRM free for years now.
DRM interferes with functionality
On January 7th, 2009 Chiron613 (not verified) says:
The problem with DRM is that it prevents me from making legitimate, personal copies. Realistically there is no way to distinguish between my making a single backup copy of a product, and making thousands of illegal copies to sell for profit. DRM assumes the worst and tries to prevent anyone from making any copies. It works, in the sense that it prevents legitimate, legal users from making backup copies. So-called "pirates" find ways to circumvent the DRM because they have a monetary interest in doing so.
There really is no good reason to prevent me from making copies of my music for my MP3 player, or to prevent me from moving the music to a new computer when the old one becomes obsolete. Except, of course, that by doing so the music industry can squeeze more money out of me, which they certainly like to do.
My answer is simple. I won't use such products.
As for DVD's, the draconian measures used to "protect" them are ineffective. They only interfere with legitimate use. As one humorous site pointed out, you can sit through the FBI warning of the legitimate movies you buy, or you can do without it altogether with the bootlegged version. So much for DRM.
DRM-free music is no problem
On January 2nd, 2009 derChef (not verified) says:
DRM-free music is no problem at all; I buy all my mp3s on Amazon; 89 or 99 cents per song, 256-320kbps, DRM-free.
If you mean DRM-free in the Linux Zealot sense of the word, then that's not possible as I am not going to stop buying DVDs or games. (I mean real games, not those "Hey look what I made" games that come packaged with Linux distros.)
Exception
On January 2nd, 2009 Amcguinn (not verified) says:
I'm always willing to make an exception for DRM systems that don't work (such as DVDs as mentioned by crashsystems).
I've also bought a few copy-protected CDs that were easy to copy.
Hmm...
On January 2nd, 2009 David Lane says:
While a good idea theoretically, it, in practice, is almost impossible.
What do we mean by controlling my media and my devices? As mentioned above, this includes things like DVDs - I can only play them (although they are getting better about giving me a "hard drive" version so I don't have to actually lug the disks around with me). I have a pile of software on my desk that is protected by software keys and EULAs that prevent me from doing a number of things with them, yet, because I need to be productive I cannot not buy them. The same goes for music that I buy - the RIAA is being less than friendly about their "EULA," also called a copyright and when you get right down to it, even our beloved Linux Journal is protected by a number of copyrights and small print on the masthead that prevent electronic storage etc, etc, etc.
So, while it is nice to say we are opposed to DRM, and I certainly am, to say I would go without it is pretty difficult to do in this day and age where very little material is not protected in some shape or another. Basically, unless you are the originator, there is not much that qualifies.
(c) 2009, all rights reserved, side affects include blurry vision, a strong need for black coffee and donuts, your mileage may vary, but feel free to comment your little hearts out.
__________________________David Lane is a member of Linux Journal's Reader Advisory Board.
Huh?
On January 3rd, 2009 Anonymous (not verified) says:
David Lane, what are you saying? Copyright is not DRM. DRM is the technical restrictions to prevent unauthorized use, such as copying. Copyright is the law that gives authors control how their work is used (copied). DRM is the way YouTube prevents LinuxJournal.com vistors from downloading videos here. Copyright is the way Linux Journal has allowed YouTube to put those restrictions on the media.
I worry when even Linux Journal has trouble with the differences between DRM and Copyright. It is not legal in the USA to "break" DRM, due to the DMCA law. It is legal, in many cases, to make unlicensed copies ("breaking copyright"), due to the Fair Use laws in the Copyright Act of 1976.
Do what you can
On January 2nd, 2009 Colin Dean (not verified) says:
It's a matter of personal choice. Some vegetarians are strict; while some avoid meat whenever possible. Sure, it's difficult to find movies and software without DRM in any format. Plenty of music without DRM exists. I'm a gamer--it's difficult for me to avoid DRM on games. I simply choose to buy my major market games through Steam, which, in my opinion, has the least invasive DRM. I guess I'll have to be creative this year.
If you have to indulge for one reason or another, then do as you must. However, continue to spread the cause and advocate the use of services which don't use DRM, such as eMusic and Amazon MP3, as well as the variety of non-DRM games. We'll all have to be creative for movies, I guess.
Is EULA = copyright? I
On January 2nd, 2009 Snack (not verified) says:
Is EULA = copyright? I thought copyright just dealt with making copies. This stuff is confusing. :(
Commercial DVDs?
On January 2nd, 2009 crashsystems (not verified) says:
I think that would include any "legal" DVD rentals or purchases (gotta love CSS encryption ;) ), so sign me up! Of course, I've already been DRM free for years now.
Post new comment