Who are the Open Source All-Stars?
As I watched the opening of last night’s All-Star Game, I could not help but think of an article I read several days before where the inventor of DNS, a man named Paul Mockapetris, was telling us how serious we should be taking the DNS security issue that had been announced.
Paul who? Well, that was my response. Sure, I knew someone or a group of someones had invented DNS, but I had never heard of Paul Mockapetris before. And sitting watching last night’s All- Stars, I was struck by how many of them I had never heard of either, many of them the current players. Sure, I could tell you why Cal Ripken was standing there but I had never heard of Luis Aparicio.
Similarly, I know who Paul Vixie (BIND) is, but I had never heard of Mark Fedor (SNMP) until I worked for him. Larry Wall (Perl and others) is almost a household name, but how about Eric Allman (sendmail)?
So it got me thinking. Who are some of the All-Stars of the Open Source world? Who are the real giants? I do not think that anyone would argue about including Linus Torvalds, but what about our friend Paul Mockapetris, or is his involvement overshadowed, as one commentator said, by the efforts of Paul Vixie, who actually implemented the solution. Does Vint Cerf belong on the list? DARPA? Dennis Ritchie? Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto?
Let me know your thoughts and I will compile the list and then we can turn it loose to the voters. Who are the All-Stars of Open Source? Both yesterday and today.
David Lane, KG4GIY is a member of Linux Journal's Editorial Advisory Panel and the Control Op for Linux Journal's Virtual Ham Shack
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- RSS Feeds
- What's the tweeting protocol?
- New Products
- Trying to Tame the Tablet
- Dart: a New Web Programming Experience
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
14 hours 15 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
16 hours 48 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
18 hours 5 min ago - great post
18 hours 40 min ago - Google Docs
19 hours 3 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
23 hours 51 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 day 38 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
1 day 2 hours ago - Thanks for taking the time to
1 day 3 hours ago - Linux is good
1 day 5 hours ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.



Comments
what about. . . .
wow, this list is ridiculously short. It needs to include not only the great programmers but also the greatest friends of open source (and not just gpl)
- i'll agree with everyones choice of stallman. there from the start.
- how about zimmerman (PGP)? the first man to take on the U.S. and win
- his (zimmerman's) attorney (and gpl3 author) eben moglen
- tridge (also mentioned) is a wildly obvious choice
- linus - he totally belongs. if you include the gpl (esp v2) as part of open source you have to count linus. He is one of the strongest supporters of the value of open source and gplv2
- de Icaza his work on 'MS' technologies has been invaluable to the open source community
- de Raadt. Very coarse personality and views, but a staunch support of open source
- andrew morton
- alan cox
- jeremy allison
- terpstra
- ibm
Mark Fedor
You work for the SNMP guy? Tell him I have a foot that wants to be put in his arse, and that it belongs to the leg of a large scale admin.
On the other hand, the stuff that he must have been smoking would be truly off this planet, so I wouldn't want to harsh his buzz, man.
Worked
Past tense, and SNMP is now in version 3 and he hasn't had his hand on it since v1. And interesting guy.
David Lane, KG4GIY is a member of Linux Journal's Editorial Advisory Panel and the Control Op for Linux Journal's Virtual Ham Shack
All-Stars?
I'd second Torvalds, Matz, and Cerf...and would add John "Maddog" Hall, Guido Van Rossum, Mark Shuttleworth, Ian whassisname from Debian, Bob Young.
my honorable mentions would include Woz, Randall Schwartz, Bill Joy, Stallman (even tho' he'd hate to be on this list).
my three cents and 12 names.
Bill Joy too may hate to be on this List
Bill Joy too might hate to be on this list. Below is a small piece of an interesting quote from an article I read from salon.com.
Intriguingly, Joy doesn't subscribe to the fundamental credo of the Linux movement -- the belief that the strength of open-source software is its ability to tap the energy and enthusiasm of a vast network of volunteer programmers. Linux is built on an egalitarian ethic: Perhaps not every programmer will write great code, but together, all those eyeballs and all those keyboard-pounding fingers will incrementally make their way toward greatness.
But Joy doesn't believe that having more programmers equals better code.
"Most people are bad programmers," says Joy. "The honest truth is that having a lot of people staring at the code does not find the really nasty bugs. The really nasty bugs are found by a couple of really smart people who just kill themselves. Most people looking at the code won't see anything ... You can't have thousands of people contributing and achieve a high standard."
The full chapter of the article can be read from the link below.
http://archive.salon.com/tech/fsp/2000/05/16/chapter_2_part_one/index2.html
All good
Certainly all those names occurred to me as well. Randall was my introduction to Perl (as he was for most people) as well as what not to do when doing security audits. I would include in that vein Garfinkle and Spafford - visionaries both.
David Lane, KG4GIY is a member of Linux Journal's Editorial Advisory Panel and the Control Op for Linux Journal's Virtual Ham Shack
Parochial Australian
I call for Andrew Tridgell to make the list if not because he's an Aussie then for his great marketing plan.
Before the days of GNU licenses, businesses insisting on paying for samba could contact pizza joints in his home town.
Where would we be with out him?
Certainly Andrew has earned consideration. Samba is a major addition to the fold.
David Lane, KG4GIY is a member of Linux Journal's Editorial Advisory Panel and the Control Op for Linux Journal's Virtual Ham Shack
Of course you should include
Of course you should include Stallman in the very first place!!! GNU/Linux wouldn't even exist as an idea if it wasn't for him. Torvalds... oh well, he is a hell of a good programmer, but not an OpenSource fighter at all... I'd include him in Programming All Stars, not in Free Software All Stars ;)
Who said anything about Free
Who said anything about Free Software All-Stars? The article is about Open Source All-Stars.
I would argue that Marc Andreesen belongs in the group. While Mosaic itself wasn't open source it led to Mozilla and ultimately Firefox.
Also a good point
I certainly did not. And I would agree that Marc is a worthy candidate.
David Lane, KG4GIY is a member of Linux Journal's Editorial Advisory Panel and the Control Op for Linux Journal's Virtual Ham Shack
Of course!
Now how could I forget Richard Stallman. I had his quote on my door for years..."Free as in Free Speech, not free beer."
I agree that Linus is a controversial figure. Much like Pete Rose. Your mileage will vary. (Let's not have a Pete Rose fight here - but if you want to discuss Linus's value, go for it.)
David Lane, KG4GIY is a member of Linux Journal's Editorial Advisory Panel and the Control Op for Linux Journal's Virtual Ham Shack
Te guy who started it all,
Te guy who started it all, and found the money to fund it. Virtually all of the projects that led to the development of personal computing and the internet were his projects:
"Joseph Carl Robnett Licklider (March 11, 1915 – June 26, 1990), known simply as J.C.R. or "Lick" was an American computer scientist, considered one of the most important figures in computer science and general computing history."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.C.R._Licklider
News to me
Sounds like someone to consider then. I have never heard of him, but then, that does not make his contributions any less valid.
David Lane, KG4GIY is a member of Linux Journal's Editorial Advisory Panel and the Control Op for Linux Journal's Virtual Ham Shack