White Ties And Red Hats At EnterpriseDB

"Is it here to stay?" has to be one of the most common questions enterprise users ask when considering Open Source options for their business needs. It's a legitimate concern with any product, Open Source or not — who wants to deploy a mission-critical service one day and be told it's no longer in development the next? In a time when the corporate side of Open Source is a bit up and down, spreading strategic support around is itself mission critical.

Open Source projects, and the companies that fund them, have to back each other up. That isn't to suggest all projects get along: that's just not going to happen. Nothing lives in a bubble, however, and cooperation between related projects is one of the keys to moving forward — we can't do what we want until they do that, and they can't do what they want until we do something else. The same principle applies on the corporate level: if Y is essential to our X, it's in our best interests to see that Y doesn't go bye-bye. (Or buy-buy, as the case often is.)

With rumors circling like tornadoes in Texas about the future of the database world's Open Source wing, it would seem like the time is at hand for Open Source's commercial forces to take a serious look at backing up their databases — the ones they rely on being available to work with whatever it is they're selling. That's just exactly what Red Hat — unquestionably a shining example of corporate Open Source — is up to.

EnterpriseDB, billed as "The Enterprise Postgres Company," has been combining PostgreSQL and commercial interests for the past five years, and in that time has set itself up as an important player when it comes to the corporate side of Open Source databases. Its Postgres Plus line of database offerings combine the commercial extras one expects from corporate Open Source with the powerful PostgreSQL database management system. EnterpriseDB claims "hundreds of customers worldwide, including Sony, FTD, hi5 Networks, Vonage, McKesson, TD Ameritrade and Backcountry.com" and an impressive list of "strategic partners" that includes "Valhalla Partners, Charles River Ventures, Fidelity Ventures, IBM, NTT and Sony."

That list has a new name on it as of today, as the company announced this morning that Red Hat has bought in to the company, a "strategic investment" as it were, "aimed at increasing enterprise adoption of open source IT infrastructure." By most accounts, the move is more than just a buy-in — it's a moved aimed at ensuring that, regardless of what happens with other Open Source database systems, enterprise-class PostgreSQL will remain a part of the corporate landscape.

As is generally the case, numbers weren't immediately available — though they'll eventually pop up, thanks to SEC filing requirements — but Red Hat must be sitting on a fairly large slice of the pie, considering the emphasis being placed on the move's "strategic" nature. One doesn't need a Nobel prize in economics to know that the combination of Sun's acquisition of MySQL AB in 2008 and Oracle's purchase of Sun, approved by federal regulators in August, has the database world worried. Given that, moves like this one — and perhaps spreading to other fields as well — may become the order of the day.

Regardless of how things wash out in the corporate world, we all know Open Source will go on. It's heartening, however, to see the big players in enterprise Open Source moving to make sure that openness remains available for commercial application as well.

______________________

Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Was just waiting for this

Ram Sambamurthy's picture

I was hoping that RedHat would get into supporting PgSQL, and now it has. Best news of 2009.

Have always been a pgsql fanboi, and use it for my servers. However, many Hosting ISP do only MySQL. I hope they have a good reason to change now. Because with RedHat, pgsql will always remain open, I'm sure.

And EnterpriseDB has also done a great job of contributing to PgAdminIII in making improvements.

What a relief! And I pray that RH will make millions out of this move and redirect corporate cash on Oracle Street to their coffers. RH has much to do to bring pgsql up to requirements that the industry typically seeks.

This is why I like Red Hat

Terrell Prude' Jr.'s picture

I've got to respect that company. It's like they've adopted an improved version of Microsoft's corporate motto!

"A computer on every desktop, running *Open Source* Software."

They've always put their money where their mouths are. They bought Netscape Directory Server and made it Free Software. They're doing the same thing with the rest of it, too (if they haven't finished already). Since they're honoring the spirit of Free Software as well as the letters of the licenses, we can have CentOS (can't do that with SLED/SLES). They sponsor Fedora. They put resources into K12LTSP (now K12Linux). They actively fight the evil of software patents, not sign on to make it worse like Novell did.

Oh, and they're making millions every year from selling Free Software.

And now they're using their war chest to help keep PostgreSQL funded so that everyone can use it? Terrific! I love PostgreSQL; it is a mighty fine RDBMS. Given Oracle's ownership of the MySQL copyrights and trademark, this was a smart move by Red Hat.

--TP

Geek Guide
The DevOps Toolbox

Tools and Technologies for Scale and Reliability
by Linux Journal Editor Bill Childers

Get your free copy today

Sponsored by IBM

Webcast
8 Signs You're Beyond Cron

Scheduling Crontabs With an Enterprise Scheduler
On Demand
Moderated by Linux Journal Contributor Mike Diehl

Sign up and watch now

Sponsored by Skybot