What constitutes "non-commercial use"?

December 11th, 2008 by Carlie Fairchild in

Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)

Creative Commons is surveying people on what they believe constitutes "non-commercial use".

Creative Commons is conducting a study on the meaning of “NonCommercial” and you can weigh in by answering a detailed questionnaire on the subject. We’ve extended the deadline for participation to December 14 (originally December 7) as we’re still getting healthy response via all those who blogged about the questionnaire this week.

Read more about the survey. As a fair heads up, it's a long survey (it just took me about 20 minutes to complete) but was certainly thought provoking. I'd love to hear what others had to think here in the comments below -- please weigh in.

__________________________

Carlie Fairchild is the publisher of Linux Journal.


Special Magazine Offer -- Free Gift with Subscription
Receive a free digital copy of Linux Journal's System Administration Special Edition as well as instant online access to current and past issues. CLICK HERE for offer

Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Anonymous's picture

There's the Rub

On December 11th, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:

I was wondering how long it would take before this became an issue for Creative Commons. The definition of Commercial is very much up in the air on the Internet. If you post something on YouTube, is it commercial? Google runs YouTube and they are commercial - and they sell advertisements around the videos. What if you use it to teach at the community college, where participants each pay you $5 for material and labor costs? What if you host it on a non-commercial indie website, and one day the website is sold for a million dollars, or instead you leverage your new reputation to get a new job.

Seems to me that just about every action has the potential for being considered "commercial". The attribution part of the CC licenses is more important than the commercial part, anyway. People are just hung up on money and the fear someone might make some off their work.

Anonymous's picture

Non-Commercial use is what

On December 11th, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:

Non-Commercial use is what fake open source and free software licenses use to pretend they're open. Think Microsoft's Shared Source, which also, if I recall correctly, has a non-disclosure clause and most other companies avoid it like the plague for fear of Microsoft's ever-too-ready IP threats.

Post new comment

Please note that comments may not appear immediately, so there is no need to repost your comment.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Newsletter

Each week Linux Journal editors will tell you what's hot in the world of Linux. You will receive late breaking news, technical tips and tricks, and links to in-depth stories featured on www.linuxjournal.com.
Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Tech Tip Videos

From the Magazine

December 2009, #188

If last month's Infrastrucuture issue was too "big" for you then try on this month's Embedded issue. Find out how to use Player for programming mobile robots, build a humidity controller for your root cellar, find out how to reduce the boot time of your embedded system, and if you're new to embedded systems find out the basics that go into one. You can also read about the Beagle Board, the Mesh Potato and a spate of other interestingly named items. And along with our regular columns don't miss our new monthly column: Economy Size Geek.


Read this issue