Home › Blogs › Doc Searls's blog ›

Unpacking lock-in, silos and walled gardens

May 03, 2009  By Doc Searls

In the Linux and FOSS worlds we've been complaining for decades about vendor lock-in, platform and service silos, walled gardens and other annoyances. So now I'm wondering what scholarship has been devoted to these practices.

I ask because I'm trying to research these subjects at more than the usual depth, and I'm not getting as far as I'd like with the speed that I'd like. One reason is just me, of course. But I'm also coming to believe that silos, walled gardens and vendor lock-in simply haven't been subject to much academic scrutiny. You can see that to some degree in Wikipedia entries for vendor lock-in and information silos. At the top of both are boxes that say, "This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources."

I don't believe there aren't any. But I do believe there aren't many. So I'm hoping one or more of ya'll might be wiling to weigh in with some help. Put it directly in Wikipedia, if you like; or just put it below and I'll work the Wikipedia side. As well as my own. Or our own. Because that's what this is really about.

______________________

Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I may have a bit...

G. Chomic's picture
Submitted by G. Chomic (not verified) on Mon, 05/04/2009 - 11:37.

Hey Doc,

I've been working with Adriana over here in London a bit. The silo effect and various other impacts have been quite a subject during my time at LSE. Let me see if I can dig around a bit and see what supports the discussion.

Digging around

Doc Searls's picture
Submitted by Doc Searls on Sun, 05/10/2009 - 05:18.

Thanks G.

Feel free to contact me by email or by adding more here.

Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal

Natural monopoly

goblin's picture
Submitted by goblin on Mon, 05/04/2009 - 03:34.

Doc, the industries where you have found walled gardens, silos and vendor lock-in, are so called "Natural monopolies". IIRC, you have commented on software, broadcast, content, and ISP industries, and all of these have characteristics of a natural monopoly.

I don't think that walled gardens, silos and vendor lock-in are separate phenomena, but rather side effects of the surrounding industries being natural monopolies.

Maybe you can find lots of research papers and other info, if your searches go after the name of the root cause for the annoyances, instead of the ad hoc names of the annoyances/symptoms?

Monopoly behavior vs. reality

Doc Searls's picture
Submitted by Doc Searls on Sun, 05/10/2009 - 06:50.

Even monopolies have choices about whether or not to silo their services or lock in their customers. Because of that, neither occur in all cases, or in uniform ways. Monopolies suffering what Clayton Christensen calls "innovators dilemma" suffer from silo's perceptions of competition from potentially disruptive technologies and changing market conditions.

In any case, root causes are interesting to me, no matter what their effects are called.

Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal

Sources

Doc Searls's picture
Submitted by Doc Searls on Sun, 05/03/2009 - 19:44.

Thanks, Ashley.

I'm surprised, as I look for sources, that the one most frequently cited — or so it seems — is myself.

One reason is that I've written often on the subject. Another is that I've been writing about it for a long time. (Like, since the mid-90s.) I doubt my views will change as I learn more; but I do expect to deepen my knowledge.

All minds need debugging, all the time. :-)

Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal

Sounds great but you are still locked in.

Scott Wilson's picture
Submitted by Scott Wilson (not verified) on Sun, 05/03/2009 - 19:35.

Watching a television program by broadband you are either locked in but the viewer requirements. American Broadcast Company requires Windows in order to watch full episodes. If you are watching a program that will work with Linux, you are still locked into the broadband connection controlled by the phone company, or cable company one one board room deal away of being locked out or trapped in a “silo” or “garden”. While your favorite on-line content has an exclusive deal with the other Internet provider and you just signed up for two year commitment (silo or garden) with your current Internet provider to get a special price break.

Of the “channel” providers that are allowing for streaming content of their programs have found a way to pay for a few shows, by having companies advertising and making you watch the add before the show continues, but would this be enough for production companies to pay for the production costs of a show or movie? Or to pay for the bandwidth of streaming the shows on-line. Then how would you group the channels you want to watch, Tier subscription prices? Our would we pay for monthly subscriptions like Netflix, say 10 to 15 dollars a month and you subscribe to say 5 or 6 channels well now you are over the bundled price with High Speed plus a satellite or cable TV prices. Not to mention that if you do not bundle the services you will pay more for the single service you now have.

I would guess that this

brian11's picture
Submitted by brian11 (not verified) on Sun, 05/03/2009 - 19:30.

I would guess that this comes from either business school or psychology. It's not that hard to see how the first reaction someone has to making something new or building and ecosystem is that they want to own it themselves. Total control gives total ability to have power and profit. That thinking may not fully stand up in the real world, but that's how most people's brains work. Vendor lockin is a manifestation of that impulse. Most of human history is based on that idea.

Keep up the work

Ashley Johnston's picture
Submitted by Ashley Johnston (not verified) on Sun, 05/03/2009 - 19:21.

Your writings on locks, gardens, and silos have had a big impact on me. I did'nt really realize that you were the only one writing about it. I don't have any sources, but I do hope that you find some and report on it.

Webcast
More Resources
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers

Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.

Learn More

Sponsored by AMD

White Paper
More Resources
Red Hat White Paper: Using an Open Source Framework to Catch the Bad Guy

Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.

Learn More

Sponsored by DLT Solutions