Skype for Linux: Where's the R-E-S-P-E-C-T?
June 20th, 2008 by James Gray
We Linux folk are the reliable early adopters of innovative applications like Skype who have done a disproportionate amount of work to make it popular. The gift horse we've gotten in return is a usable but much less feature-rich version that is years behind the other platforms. We're missing key features like sending SMS (argghhh!!!), video snapshots, the ability to import contacts from Yahoo and Gmail, a better UI and much more.
Now Skype 4.0 beta is available but only on Windows. Version 4.0 offers many new innovations, such as a much improved GUI (the Linux version will feel even more archaic), easier-to-use video calls, money sending, Skypecasts and more.
I contacted Skype what their plans are for Linux. Here is Skype's reponse:
Skype's Mac & Linux teams are both working closely with the Windows team and are monitoring feedback on this Beta release along with them.
Skype will take what is learned from this Beta release (which is not about new features, but is about a new user interface) and incorporate it into future product releases for other platforms.
I hope this helps shed some insight into Skype's product development process.
In response I put in a query to find out when the Linux and Mac versions will be available, but to be honest, I am not optimistic, given Skype's history. Don't get me wrong, I do appreciate the fact that Skype has a Linux version. I just think that after all of the support our community has given to Skype, that we deserve the most current and feature rich version.
Now only if every Linux user Skyped the company at the same time... ;)
__________________________
Special Magazine Offer -- Free Gift with Subscription
Receive a free digital copy of Linux Journal's System Administration Special Edition as well as instant online access to current and past issues. CLICK HERE for offer
Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Post to TwitterSubscribe now!
The Latest
Newsletter
Tech Tip Videos
Recently Popular
From the Magazine
July 2009, #183
News Flash: Linux Kernel 3.0 to include an on-the-go Expresso machine interface! Ok, maybe not, but Linux is definitely going mobile, from phones to e-readers. Find out more inside about Android, the Kindle 2, the Western Digital MyBook II, The Bug, and Indamixx (a portable recording studio). And if you've gone mobile and you been wanting more Emacs in your life then check out Conkeror.
To compliment the mobile we've got the stationary: parsing command line options with getopt, checking your Ruby code with metric_fu, and building a secure Squid proxy. How is this stationary you ask? What can we say? It's not. We just wanted to see if anybody actually read this part of the page :) .
All this and more, and all you have to do is get your hot sweaty hands on the latest copy of Linux Journal.
my linux skype issues
On May 30th, 2009 Anonymous (not verified) says:
skype install was VERY HARD for both my eeeBuntu eee-pc, and Unubtu intrepid x64.
I went through many audio drivers and hacking on the eee-pc, and the audio performance
is still choppy (buffer underruns?). I at least hope that the appliance Xandros
skype install somehow works better.... it better be clean on the eee-pc based videophone product!
I had a lot of trouble with a lot of sites giving instructions for a 64-bit install.
the medibuntu package eventually installed and ran, but no sound support.
I went back and installed every alsa/oss package I could find, then it started working.
But the old GUI is problematic. My windows contacts all have the "conversations" tab on the gui,
and easy access to sporatic text messages. not so on LINUX.
Yes, 32-bit will run on 64-bit linux, but even for a professional software developer
like me, the install can be very challenging. A native 64-bit install will be much easier.
Perhaps even documentation stating, in prose, what drivers we will need would be nice...
not just hacking. assuming that skype has a package for our distro is a bad idea.
Give us the prose we need to just install Skype executables, and figure out what else
needs to be present to run on our distro.
Then the community will provide packages, instead of Skype only providing the product
as LINUX packages themselves. a win-win in my opinion.
Just tell us skype requirements, and distribution maintainers will create the .deb's, .rpm's...
This pattern is used by many popular LINUX packages.
I need a better skype for
On May 5th, 2009 thatyskie (not verified) says:
I need a better skype for Linux OPENSUSE 11.0.
Now i have the 2.0 version, but i need ba better! When comes the 4.0 version for linux? I need it now!
Improve on voice and video features
On March 30th, 2009 Anonymous (not verified) says:
All i want in a skype 3.0 for linux is improvment with the voice and video. The UI could use some touching up but I like it small and simple. No need for an over bloated app like the 4.0 on M$. Hopefully the skype guys read some of this. I doubt it but whatever.........
I run Skype on my Ubuntu box
On March 16th, 2009 Kabatology (not verified) says:
I run Skype on my Ubuntu box and a find it very necessary. I was pissed off by the fact that sending sms was not possible including other rich features that the windows version has, but i got a solution to sending sms with Skype 2 for Linux -> http://www.kabatology.com/02/05/ubuntu-how-to-send-text-messages-with-skype-for-linux/ They really don't have respect for Linux users. Skype-Windows is on version 4, Skype-Linux on version 2
community developed skype
On February 6th, 2009 Rodrigo Salinas (not verified) says:
What about a community developed version of skype? Couldn't we as a community develop a nicer gui or even a better version of the skype client, it could be a carbon copy of the windows version, or it could be our own improved version. There could be more than 1 version, just like messenger clients, there are now a tonne of clients for messenger out there.BTW the client for the wengo out there is preeety nice, could someone port it to skype?
I disagree with the article
On August 9th, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
I'm very glad that the linux version lacks some features of the windows version. Why? Because they're unnecessary and bloated. Sending money? What the hell? Few people ever need that and it has nothing to do with IM or VOIP whatsoever, so thanks for not putting this in the linux version. Same for those stupid games and other useless crap that you can install. The linux GUI is *much* cleaner and easier to use than the windows version, so in my opinion the linux version is not behind, it's *ahead*!
Skype is a corporation like
On July 13th, 2008 minhaaj (not verified) says:
Skype is a corporation like all others. It is bound to hunt money like other greed mongers. Don't be shocked about that. We are here to stay though. Linux IS the future. These cheap tricks won't help already dwindling windows.
no 64 bit support
On June 26th, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
I haven't run a 32 bit Linux on a PC in years.
Skype has never released a 64 bit Linux version.
I use Skype much less these days....
Not a problem
On August 9th, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
The 32-bit version runs on 64-bit linux just fine. So what? Admittedly, it might be less performant this way, but it works.
There's also 64bit version
On April 13th, 2009 MeanEYE (not verified) says:
There's also 64bit version of skype for linux... I lost the link but with some digging am sure you'll be able to find it...
improved GUI?
On June 24th, 2008 Daniel Kvasnicka jr. (not verified) says:
Improved GUI? I sincerely _hope_ this new 4.0 UI will _never_ make it to the Linux version. I love the way they keep the Linux version UI simple and more minimalistic. Yeah, I'd like to see more coherence in terms of feature sets, but that can be done without making Skype's UI a christmas tree...
what about GIZMO?
On June 23rd, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
as I know, Gizmo is using SIP, what it is(?) an open standard (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261). By the way, Gizmo is supported for several distros, and even for my N800, and (I need to try it) seems to support the camera also. I have found interesting that you can have all your IM accounts setup into Gizmo, and of course the same functionality that Skype offers: PC to phone calls, conferencing, local phone numbers even in my country(!)and free Gizmo to Gizmo talk.
But, and here is the point, it is not free software. As the public phone network is not free either, so what we need to do is to show companies the address we are intended to take in the medium-long term: I have quited my skype account and I am now inviting all my friends to use Gizmo. Then we will show how we expect things to work, but I agree that is not a good choice to just isolate yourself and not use anything that is not free. I believe in a free world, and I think this is a way to get there. Opinions?
regards
Arturo
When will someone reverse-engineer it?
On June 22nd, 2008 Epicanis (not verified) says:
Or alternatively, put enough pressure on skype to open up a SIP or IAX gateway, much as AOL is rumored to be adding an XMPP gateway to AIM.
Friends dont let friends use proprietary closed protocols
On June 21st, 2008 Jean-Marc Liotier (not verified) says:
Skype is not Free Software : you cannot change it, examine it for errors and security holes, or use it except with their permission and on their terms. You can’t trust your communications to Skype, even if it is convenient and popular.
Skype's protocol is only used by Skype, not published and not implemented by anyone else. You cannot make it interact with anything but the Skype client. You cannot combine it with anything else to make it more valuable. You cannot have a client more suitable for your needs as the official Skype client is the only one allowed.
With hundred of implementations of SIP, IAX and other open protocols; and with E164 and others to identify users, I cannot understand why anyone would use Skype.
Who in their right minds would use a proprietary and closed network ? Just say no ! We, as consumers, are aware of the benefits of an open standards based networks. We have a duty to make the right choices and explain them to the people around us. That begins with telling our contacts that we are not available on AIM, Yahoo, MSN, Skype & co. Interoperability is not enough - only standards and open networks will do !
I know I sound like a an extremist zealot. But this is an important battle. What we have today exists only because TCP/IP, SMTP and other standards prevailed and made the open Internet. The next generation of services depends on an IM system. It may be XMPP, it may be SIP based IMS infrastructures - whatever. But please don't let it be a bunch of closed systems such as Skype.
Market inertia
On June 26th, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
As I recall, they were the first to offer a truly free (as in no additional cost over your ISP connection) voice on internet service. And, it's just a free download - no special hardware to buy. As such, they have huge market inertia. One person I know said to me "My business contacts use it, so I have to, as well. And I don't want to use anything else."
you're not well informed
On June 30th, 2008 freechelmi (not verified) says:
We used open sourced VOIP apps long before skype came. It's silly to think skype saved the world of VOIP. for me they kinda ruin it. Let's hope VOIP apps will become as standard as email apps in a few years .
Unfortunately lots of people
On June 23rd, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
Unfortunately lots of people do not think that far. They just want what is convenient in the short term. It's now up to the community to create a reasonable free and open alternative to compete.
Tin Foil Time
On June 22nd, 2008 Yonah (not verified) says:
You should not a cellphone or telephone, ever. It's not open source, you aren't allowed to go down to your local PBX and check for security holes, and you can't use it as you wish without abiding by the terms of your local phone or cellular provider. You can't trust your communications provider, even if it's convenient and popular.
Don't want to use Skype, AIM, MSN, or any other service/protocol not defecated out by the FOSS community? Then don't. Sit down, shut up, and go away. The ironic part is that there isn't anyone that would really want to talk to you anyway. You aren't a zealot, you're a paranoid fool.
Re:
On June 24th, 2008 Artem S. Tashkinov (not verified) says:
Cannot agree more.
Sometimes I just wish all open source zealots to shut up because it's nothing wrong that [high] quality proprietary software exists.
Nothing wrong with proprietary software ?
On June 24th, 2008 Jean-Marc Liotier (not verified) says:
Indeed there is nothing wrong with proprietary software - provided that it is interoperable so that other choices may exist. Skype is not interoperable with anything. Do you want to talk to whoever you want regardless of what software your correspondent chooses ? Or do you want to talk only to people who run the same software as you ?
When you have choice, choose.
On June 24th, 2008 Jean-Marc Liotier (not verified) says:
Indeed the PSTN is far from ideal. As you say, the PSTN cannot be trusted and I refrain from discussing sensitive matters over it. We have tolerated it so far because there were not many attractive alternatives. But they are increasingly credible : IMS infrastructure is the carrier's current move into "everything over IP" - and consumers are moving in the same direction albeit in a more decentralized way whenever they can. The general public will soon understand (with help from eager service providers of course) that voice is just another service that runs on top of an Internet connection. And understanding is the first step toward freedom.
And I am not going to "sit down, shut up, and go away" : you may value freedom less than I do and you may hate my preach but that will not stop me from showing my friends the way, even if they only begin to understand how large the stakes are.
If you think I am paranoid, then think about the world of disconnected walled gardens that might well have been - the world of iMode, Minitel, AOL, interactive TV & co that the corporate world of the eighties was presenting as the future. In fact, if Internet pioneers had the same naive feelings as you, you would not even be able to comment on this article because it would not exist. Think about it.
Paranoid fool?
On June 23rd, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
Or could it be that he/she is one of many Linux users growing tired of being exploited by greedy, parasitic corporations who don't return anything back to the community except leavings and other trash. FOSS involves contributing and sharing. Skype is one of several products who glad-handed the Linux community until their product was golden and then told them to take a hike. So Microsoftian of them.
better paranoid than naive,
On June 23rd, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
better paranoid than naive, I think :)
I do not like an idea, that
On June 24th, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
I do not like an idea, that an application based on a closed protocol could contain some sort of backdoors, which would allow third-party "wire tapping". I am a strong supporter of open protocols with strong encryption, as I see that people has their right to have a privacy, although some governments feel that people must give up their privacy for the common good, as they would state it nicely.
Also, I don't like that Skype doesn't provide a working API that would allow it to be integrated with other messenger applications.
This closed protocol-approach prevents also implementing Skype for other systems eg. embedded platforms.
Best Reply Ever.
On June 22nd, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
Best Reply Ever.
They don't have alot of
On June 20th, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
They don't have alot of linux users since we
hear reports of skype scanning the user's machine.
In windows, hey, who cares, but in linux skype is
not a good citizen. chroot jail for skype is a big,
but hard to fathom need. Once that is fixed then
maybe we'll think about installing it, and then maybe
we'll bug skype for a newer version.
Even Linux users have to
On June 22nd, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
Even Linux users have to talk to regular human beings and my mom doesn't know what a router is. She doesn't know if her computer is NAT'ed and what port redirection is. On the other hand she can double-click setup.exe, then do next, next, next, finish. I can even walk her through creating a user profile and logging in.
Same thing applies to my sis-in-law or my bro. We all live one continent apart one from another.
Try setting up the same people with a SIP phone. You'll have a hard time having a voice only conversation and forget about having them configure video.
OpenWengo came too late. There's no way any of my Skype contacts will switch to something else because they now have their own contact lists and they don't see any benefit in switching to Wengo (or other). Skype works and they know how to use it.
I agree with the fact that Skype for Linux is way behind its Windows or Mac counterparts and I did feel the frustration and growing anger when waiting for the Linux version to support video conversations. That's why while waiting for the Linux version to catch up I learned to use Asterisk.
Now that I have my own Asterisk box I don't use SkypeOut anymore, but I am stuck with Skype for video conferencing, because that's what everybody I know uses too.
Not true
On June 22nd, 2008 Cappy (not verified) says:
Skype only scans firefox's config for its proxy settings. Stop spreading old FUD that's not true.
errr?
On June 22nd, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
not sure what you talking about
been running it on my ubuntu 8.04 for 4 months now
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Skype
And I don't run it because
On June 22nd, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
And I don't run it because it is proprietary software. Empathy with it's voice calls to Jabber (and Gtalk) users does it's job quite well. Soon Kopete should also support voice calls.
John Thomas
On June 22nd, 2008 John DoGoode (not verified) says:
Linux totally ROCKS. Wish I would have made the switch years ago!
JT
http://www.anondo.alturl.com
Post new comment