Senators Nudge EU On Sun
The acquisition of Sun Microsystems by Oracle has become an ongoing saga, one that is reportedly seeing Sun hemorrhage cash at an alarming rate. The company's troubles have now found their way to the hallowed halls of Congress, where a majority of the U.S. Senate has entered the fray.
The latest development in the Sun soap opera comes as the result of recent actions by European antitrust regulators. The beginning of November brought a "Statement of Objections" from regulators, taking issue with various aspects of the proposed deal. Paramount is the issue of competition in the database market, as Sun acquired MySQL in the not-so-distant past. Many have suggested that the concerns are misplaced, however, given the differences between Oracle and MySQL products, as well as the Open Source nature of MySQL. That the latter has little in the way of European market share has likewise been noted.
Despite having issued it's formal objections, the European Commission continues to investigate the matter, and according to Oracle officials, it's costing Sun some $100 million per month. Given that Sun is a sizable employer, concern has grown that layoffs and possibly worse may be on the horizon, leading US officials to step in. Following the lead of high-profile senators Orrin Hatch and John Kerry, some fifty-nine members of the Untied States Senate — more than half — joined in sending a letter to the European Commission, asking that it complete its investigation ASAP. Citing the threat to American jobs, Senator Kerry told reporters that the senators "felt compelled to ask for a speedy resolution" to the seven-month saga.
The European Commission's investigation falls into a somewhat unique legal arena. Though reports often describe it as "blocking" such acquisitions, it lacks the authority to prevent the deal outright. As both Oracle and Sun are U.S. corporations, they fall under the exclusive purview of the U.S. Department of Justice, and may continue with the takeover regardless of the Commission's decision.
That isn't to suggest that the EC is powerless, however — though it can't block the move, it can bar the companies from doing business within the European Union. Such a move would be extreme to say the least, as it would significantly unbalance competition in the European database market, likely creating a far worse situation than permitting the acquisition would have. In addition, it would leave Oracle and MySQL customers in Europe in the cold, a situation which would no doubt land itself squarely in the laps of European legislators besieged by irate constituents. Ever seeing a situation of that nature is infinitely unlikely, as cooler heads and diplomatic resolution inevitably prevail.
What effect the senator's move may have on the situation is a matter for speculation, though such a dramatic show by more than half of Congress' upper house is unlikely to be lost on European officials. Whether a decision will appear posthaste remains — with great curiosity — to be seen.
__________________________
Justin Ryan is the News Editor for Linux Journal.
Look for him in the #linuxjournal IRC channel.
Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- New Products
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- New Products
- Trying to Tame the Tablet
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- enterprise
21 min 53 sec ago - not living upto the mobile revolution
3 hours 13 min ago - Deceptive Advertising and
3 hours 48 min ago - Let\'s declare that you have
3 hours 49 min ago - Alterations in Contest Due
3 hours 50 min ago - At a numbers mindset, your
3 hours 51 min ago - Do not get Just Almost any
3 hours 55 min ago - A fantastic rule-of-thumb to
3 hours 56 min ago - Keren mastah..
Penting,
4 hours 54 min ago - mini tablet compare
6 hours 13 min ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.



Comments
Let's give peple who try to commit suicide the death penalty.
Since the majority of Oracle software is leased/licensed rather than owned, forcing companies who use Oracle in a tight spot. They might even move their database servers out of Europe. Worse the lawsuits from the companies who no longer pay Oracle but keep their servers going. The companies who sue ( either Oracle or the EU ) because they can't get a license.
So they stop Sun from doing busines in the EU. I can't speak about the rest but it seems to me that effectively forces people in the EU to stop using MySQL, but that's exactly the fear that the EU has about Oracle acquiring SUN, that Oracle will shut down MySQL.
Bubba misses the Point
and misses it so badly, it sounds like he is a corporate shill for Oracle.
Of course either way Europe would lose MySQL. But the Commission's way, Oracle would lose a lot of money, and that is Oracle's incentive for abiding by the Commission's rules of fair competition -- something our Senators have shown too little love for.
The EU Commission is taking too long to do it, but they are doing what our govermnent should have done but failed to do: enforce the laws that allow truly free market competition, without the unfair competitive practices that monopolies like AT&T, IBM, Microsoft and other robber baron miscreants have inflicted on us for decades.
eu response
I think the EU would simply fine them!