Loading
Rsync, It's GRRRRaphical!
Every year for our Readers' Choice survey, the venerable tool rsync gets votes for favorite backup tool. That never surprises us, because every time I need to copy a group of files and folders, rsync is the tool I use by default. It really has everything—local folder support, SSH tunneling support, delta-only synchronization, speed, versatility, and quite frankly, it's just a great program. It has everything—except a GUI.
Don't get me wrong; rsync works great without a GUI. I use it on the command line almost daily. The problem with rsync's amazing power is a rather complex set of arguments. It's possible to learn those flags, but for the neophyte user, they can be overwhelming. That's where Grsync really shines.
Grsync does a great job of turning countless command-line options into a manageable collection of check boxes and text-entry areas. When you add the nifty "sessions" feature that remembers settings along with source and destinations, it turns into the perfect filesystem sync tool. If you've ever felt rsync was powerful but too complex to use on a regular basis, I highly recommend Grsync. For making such a powerful tool accessible to the unwashed masses, Grsync gets this month's Editors' Choice Award. Now go copy some files! See http://grsync.sourceforge.net.
______________________
Shawn Powers is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal. You might find him chatting on the IRC channel, or Twitter
Webcast
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
White Paper
Red Hat White Paper: Using an Open Source Framework to Catch the Bad Guy
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?
- Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development
- New Products
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- RSS Feeds
- Readers' Choice Awards
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- DynDNS
1 hour 14 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
1 hour 46 min ago - All the articles you talked
4 hours 10 min ago - All the articles you talked
4 hours 13 min ago - All the articles you talked
4 hours 14 min ago - myip
8 hours 39 min ago - Keeping track of IP address
10 hours 30 min ago - Roll your own dynamic dns
15 hours 43 min ago - Please correct the URL for Salt Stack's web site
18 hours 55 min ago - Android is Linux -- why no better inter-operation
21 hours 10 min ago
Poll
Comments
http://www.hairwigs.de/ A lot
http://www.hairwigs.de/ A lot of people in our industry haven't had very diverse experiences. So they don't have enough dots to connect, and they end up with very linear solutions without a broad perspective on the problem. The broader one's understanding of the human experience, the better design we will have.
comment
You're so cool! I don't think I've read anything like this before. So good to find somebody with some original thoughts on this subject. Thanks for starting this up.
This is cool. Gonna give it a
This is cool. Gonna give it a try. butik baju korea
thx for the info.
I love rsync as well. anti
I love rsync as well. anti snore pillow. Too awesome to be true :D
› Rsync, It's
›
Rsync, It's GRRRRaphical!
Jan 02, 2013 By Shawn Powers
in
Editors' Choice
SysAdmin
Tech Tips
Every year for our Readers' Choice survey, the venerable tool rsync gets votes for favorite backup tool. That never surprises us, because every time I need to copy a group of files and folders, rsync is the tool I use by default. It really has everything—local folder support, SSH tunneling support, delta-only synchronization, speed, versatility, and quite frankly, it's just a great program. It has everything—except a GUI.
Don't get me wrong; rsync works great without a GUI. I use it on the command line almost daily. The problem with rsync's amazing power is a rather complex set of arguments. It's possible to learn those flags, but for the neophyte user, they can be overwhelming. That's where Grsync really shines.
Grsync does a great job of turning countless command-line options into a manageable collection of check boxes and text-entry areas. When you add the nifty "sessions" feature that remembers settings along with source and destinations, it turns into the perfect filesystem sync tool. If you've ever felt rsync was powerful but too complex to use on a regular basis, I highly recommend Grsync. For making such a powerful tool accessible to the unwashed masses, Grsync gets this month's Editors' Choice Award. Now go copy some files! See http://grsync.sourceforge.net.
______________________
Shawn Powers is an Associate Editor for Linux Journal. You might find him chatting on the IRC channel, or Twitter
Login to save this as favorite
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
SlashDot
StumbleUpon
Post to Twitter
Comments
Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
hi
avg123's picture
Submitted by avg123 (not verified) on Wed, 02/13/2013 - 02:39.
This the way you just did.I’m really impressed that there’s so much about this subject that’s been uncovered and you did it so well, with so much class. Good one you, man ! Really great stuff here.
buy real facebook likes
reply
Query regarding M.tech(Computers) thesis
Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 01/12/2013 - 11:05.
can anyone plz suggest me topics regarding latest research areas in linux....
i will be doing my m.tech thesis on the same.....
or plz provide some links where i can be a part of such ongoing project in india ...
plz....
thanks in advance....
reply
A lot of people in our
get twitter followers's picture
Submitted by get twitter followers (not verified) on Sun, 02/24/2013 - 11:45.
A lot of people in our industry haven't had very diverse experiences. So they don't have enough dots to connect, and they end up with very linear solutions without a broad perspective on the problem. The broader one's understanding of the human experience, the better design we will have.
reply
It really has
autel maxidas ds708 pro's picture
Submitted by autel maxidas ds708 pro (not verified) on Fri, 01/11/2013 - 21:20.
It really has everything—local folder support, SSH tunneling support, delta-only synchronization, speed, versatility, and quite frankly, it's just a great program.
__________________
ds708
http://www.autelcn.com/
reply
Rsync syncs with samba shares?
Arvi Pingus's picture
Submitted by Arvi Pingus (not verified) on Fri, 01/11/2013 - 11:59.
In the pasted I tried to use Grsync, Luckybackup, rdiff-backup etc. but always ran into the problem that the underneath rsync didn't work with samba shares unless I mounted them as local shares. With a (variable) number of windows-pc's in my network I like to sync like say (MS Windows only) Vice Versa. Point your target and when it is up and running sync (the differences). Saves a lot of time, backing up only the files that changed or were newly created.
reply
Nothing like the command line
Recettes Thai's picture
Submitted by Recettes Thai (not verified) on Thu, 01/10/2013 - 05:39.
Nothing like the command line to me too !
I use rsync on a daily basis, most of it to synchronize datas between servers/directory.
I also heard about unison. Does someone use it ? What's the diff with rsync ?
reply
The main difference between
Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/11/2013 - 08:34.
The main difference between rsync and Unison is that Unison's had both a and graphical user interface for a long time while rsync's been just command line.
reply
rdiff-backup
Rick's picture
Submitted by Rick (not verified) on Tue, 01/08/2013 - 19:19.
I love rsync, but If you want a real backup tool, try rdiff-backup (http://rdiff-backup.nongnu.org/).
It's a command-line incremental (reverse diffs) backup tool and uses librsync so it's very efficient.
reply
Clearly you have never used grsync
Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 01/07/2013 - 09:21.
yeah! I was excited about grsync when i first learned about it ... over a year ago. then, i installed and used it to backup a fairly large directory containing lots and lots of files. and what did i find:
* as mentioned earlier, grsync's performance is pathetic
* grsync crashed on me a couple of times
over all, I figured it was time to go back to my scripts to backup my data.
grsync could evolve into a great tool, but, till then ... stick with rsync wrapped in scripts. just my $0.02.
reply
I must agreed. I tried many
Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 01/08/2013 - 04:39.
I must agreed.
I tried many different graphical tools, include grsync and have always gone back to my shell script.
Much neater.
reply
I really love what you do,
Bichon maltais's picture
Submitted by Bichon maltais (not verified) on Sat, 01/05/2013 - 03:39.
I really love what you do, bravo! Thank you very much for sharing with us this article.
reply
Performance
marshal's picture
Submitted by marshal (not verified) on Fri, 01/04/2013 - 04:54.
Performance of Grsync is very low.
The command line rsync with the same arguments is about 12 times faster on my PC then Grsync.
Data copied: ~850MB source code, about 80000 files under Grsync took ~12 minutes while rsync ~1 minute.
reply
Luckybackup
Dave Ashmore's picture
Submitted by Dave Ashmore (not verified) on Thu, 01/03/2013 - 04:29.
Check out Luckybackkup it is a guide for rsync & ssh. Real nice.
reply
I agree, I use Luckybackup as
Leona's picture
Submitted by Leona (not verified) on Tue, 01/08/2013 - 04:33.
I agree, I use Luckybackup as you can set up scheduled tasks too, very powerful.
reply
Tried luckybackup, then
Anonymous's picture
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 01/03/2013 - 11:43.
Tried luckybackup, then Grsync and I haven't looked back.
IMHO Grsync is much simpler.
reply
Rsync
Esteban's picture
Submitted by Esteban (not verified) on Wed, 01/02/2013 - 14:22.
I started with Grsync then viewed the commands. I use a script with rsync commands to back up my data. I still use Grsync - it's simple, fast, easy, etc.
reply
Post new comment
Please note that comments may not appear immediately, so there is no need to repost your comment.IBM's platform as a service (PaaS), IBM SmartCloud Application Services, is now generally available and ready to help your development team collaborate in the cloud!
http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/bethlehem/index.ssf/2008/11/australian_c...
hi
This the way you just did.I’m really impressed that there’s so much about this subject that’s been uncovered and you did it so well, with so much class. Good one you, man ! Really great stuff here.
buy real facebook likes
Query regarding M.tech(Computers) thesis
can anyone plz suggest me topics regarding latest research areas in linux....
i will be doing my m.tech thesis on the same.....
or plz provide some links where i can be a part of such ongoing project in india ...
plz....
thanks in advance....
A lot of people in our
A lot of people in our industry haven't had very diverse experiences. So they don't have enough dots to connect, and they end up with very linear solutions without a broad perspective on the problem. The broader one's understanding of the human experience, the better design we will have.
It really has
It really has everything—local folder support, SSH tunneling support, delta-only synchronization, speed, versatility, and quite frankly, it's just a great program.
__________________
ds708
http://www.autelcn.com/
Rsync syncs with samba shares?
In the pasted I tried to use Grsync, Luckybackup, rdiff-backup etc. but always ran into the problem that the underneath rsync didn't work with samba shares unless I mounted them as local shares. With a (variable) number of windows-pc's in my network I like to sync like say (MS Windows only) Vice Versa. Point your target and when it is up and running sync (the differences). Saves a lot of time, backing up only the files that changed or were newly created.
Nothing like the command line
Nothing like the command line to me too !
I use rsync on a daily basis, most of it to synchronize datas between servers/directory.
I also heard about unison. Does someone use it ? What's the diff with rsync ?
The main difference between
The main difference between rsync and Unison is that Unison's had both a and graphical user interface for a long time while rsync's been just command line.
rdiff-backup
I love rsync, but If you want a real backup tool, try rdiff-backup (http://rdiff-backup.nongnu.org/).
It's a command-line incremental (reverse diffs) backup tool and uses librsync so it's very efficient.
Clearly you have never used grsync
yeah! I was excited about grsync when i first learned about it ... over a year ago. then, i installed and used it to backup a fairly large directory containing lots and lots of files. and what did i find:
* as mentioned earlier, grsync's performance is pathetic
* grsync crashed on me a couple of times
over all, I figured it was time to go back to my scripts to backup my data.
grsync could evolve into a great tool, but, till then ... stick with rsync wrapped in scripts. just my $0.02.
I must agreed. I tried many
I must agreed.
I tried many different graphical tools, include grsync and have always gone back to my shell script.
Much neater.
I really love what you do,
I really love what you do, bravo! Thank you very much for sharing with us this article.
Performance
Performance of Grsync is very low.
The command line rsync with the same arguments is about 12 times faster on my PC then Grsync.
Data copied: ~850MB source code, about 80000 files under Grsync took ~12 minutes while rsync ~1 minute.
Luckybackup
Check out Luckybackkup it is a guide for rsync & ssh. Real nice.
I agree, I use Luckybackup as
I agree, I use Luckybackup as you can set up scheduled tasks too, very powerful.
Tried luckybackup, then
Tried luckybackup, then Grsync and I haven't looked back.
IMHO Grsync is much simpler.
Rsync
I started with Grsync then viewed the commands. I use a script with rsync commands to back up my data. I still use Grsync - it's simple, fast, easy, etc.