Quebec government being sued, for buying Microsoft!
This certainly qualifies as an interesting development. CBC is reporting that FACIL, a non-profit organization that promotes the adoption of free software in Quebec, is suing the provincial government for buying Microsoft software. More specifically, they are alleging that Quebec's provincial government refuses to allow competing bids (including bids from free software vendors) in preference of large players like Microsoft. Allow me to quote from the CBC article.
"Quebec's open-source software association is suing the provincial government, saying it is giving preferential treatment to Microsoft Corp. by buying the company's products rather than using free alternatives. The lawsuit by Facil was lodged with the Quebec Superior Court on July 15 and made public on Wednesday. In it, the group says the provincial government has refused to entertain competing bids from all software providers, opting instead to supply public-sector departments with products bought from proprietary vendors such as Microsoft and Oracle Corp."
You can read the entire article on the CBC Website. You will also want to read FACIL's press release on this suit.
What do you think? Is FACIL doing the right thing? I've said many times that it's very nearly a crime that our governments and schools cry poverty when they spend a veritable fortune on proprietary software and its trappings. Is FACIL's action what's needed to force government to play nice with our tax dollars?
-- Marcel (Writer and Free Thinker at Large) Gagné
-- marcelgagne.com and cookingwithlinux.com
Marcel (Writer and Free Thinker at Large) Gagné
http://www.marcelgagne.com AND www.cookingwithlinux.com
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving | May 21, 2013 |
| Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development | May 20, 2013 |
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Using Salt Stack and Vagrant for Drupal Development
- Dynamic DNS—an Object Lesson in Problem Solving
- New Products
- Validate an E-Mail Address with PHP, the Right Way
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Download the Free Red Hat White Paper "Using an Open Source Framework to Catch the Bad Guy"
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Keeping track of IP address
9 min 50 sec ago - Roll your own dynamic dns
5 hours 23 min ago - Please correct the URL for Salt Stack's web site
8 hours 34 min ago - Android is Linux -- why no better inter-operation
10 hours 50 min ago - Connecting Android device to desktop Linux via USB
11 hours 18 min ago - Find new cell phone and tablet pc
12 hours 16 min ago - Epistle
13 hours 45 min ago - Automatically updating Guest Additions
14 hours 54 min ago - I like your topic on android
15 hours 40 min ago - This is the easiest tutorial
22 hours 16 min ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Pi Cobbler Breakout Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Pi Cobbler Breakout Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- 5-21-13, Prototyping Pi Plate Kit: Philip Kirby
- Next winner announced on 5-27-13!
Free Webinar: Hadoop
How to Build an Optimal Hadoop Cluster to Store and Maintain Unlimited Amounts of Data Using Microservers
Realizing the promise of Apache® Hadoop® requires the effective deployment of compute, memory, storage and networking to achieve optimal results. With its flexibility and multitude of options, it is easy to over or under provision the server infrastructure, resulting in poor performance and high TCO. Join us for an in depth, technical discussion with industry experts from leading Hadoop and server companies who will provide insights into the key considerations for designing and deploying an optimal Hadoop cluster.
Some of key questions to be discussed are:
- What is the “typical” Hadoop cluster and what should be installed on the different machine types?
- Why should you consider the typical workload patterns when making your hardware decisions?
- Are all microservers created equal for Hadoop deployments?
- How do I plan for expansion if I require more compute, memory, storage or networking?



Comments
So a non profit group sues
So a non profit group sues the government but cringes at the site of it competitor?
some other concern
I know this has nothing to do with what your talking about, but i want to say that the quebec government is so dumb and greedy that people who even want to go on vacation are taxes 2 times ,because the governemt does not even want to make people leave , listen up quebec get with the program or be embarresed.
Wow, didn't even know about
Wow, didn't even know about it. Regarding your question you are right on the one hand. On the other hand they'd invest in the future and innovations so it would be a great contribution to sustainability.
Quebec government being sued, for buying Microsoft
Not for buying Microsoft, but for not evaluating alternatives. One guy at my company who makes purchasing decisions doesn't trust it if he doesn't pay for it, so he doesn't even look at it. The loophole that allows the Quebec government to do the same thing MUST be closed. The government may well end up going with proprietary software, but first they must be forced to look at alternatives and to provide rock-solid reasons for their final choice, especially if they choose to pay for it when good, free alternatives are available.
Support
How about factoring in the cost of all the other issues that face an organization that chooses the open-source route:
- training costs
- support costs
- programing costs ~ ie: compatibility with archaic software (it is a government organization don't forget).
I wonder if microsoft isn't actually cheaper in the long run.
That's my 3 cents.
I think so
Hello,
First of all - FACIL means ease in Portuguese. But, for sure, they will not face the things easily. M$ costs $$$$$ and sale the myth of they do the better and the right software. The M$ people will hurry run to convince the Government about it.
But, it's not so complicated to understand the math involved on those issues.
Let's get just the PC OS(Windows)+Office pack, for us do a little calculus:
Each M$Office costs about U$300 + Win another U$200 - total U$500 per Computer.
Quebec may have about 5000 PC computers(just a guess)
If my numbers are not so wrong, let's calculate ---
5000(computers) X 500(Win+Off) = U$2,500,000.00
Ok, we have at least Open Office + Linux(a large variety of flavors) able to do the same - FOR FREE !!!!
Other approach... If Quebec have, at least, 5000 computers in a network. The need to use Servers and servers must run Win server OS...
Each Server OS costs about U$700, licenses for each 5 users.
So, Quebec must to buy about 1000 licenses and cost will be - 1,000 X U$700 = 700,000.00 Ok, a discount and U$ 500,000.00 seems as a good value - Once again Free and costless options are available.
So, for the Quebec use 5000 PC's they must to pay about U$3,000,000.00
Just to turn the machines On, write, letters, send/receive e-mails, etc.
Since we have cheaper and/or costless alternatives, to do it, in my point of view, FACIL are absolutely right to ask for the gov to use these money in a better way, in education, health, security, etc.
Regards,
What's the law say?
If the law says that competing bids must be entertained and the provincial gov't is 'discarding' or refusing those bids, then the provincial gov't is violating the law.
So long as FACIL is going after the gov't for violating the law, then they are doing the right thing. If there is no 'fairness in bidding' law, then the gov't is free to pick and choose the bids it wants to consider.
I hope...
...that I'm speaking for all people interested in FOSS and politics when I say: This should happen more often. Scrutiny on a public entity and its spending of tax money should be very emphasized.