With Linux vs. Because of Linux
May 7th, 2008 by Doc Searls
I'm looking to compare how much money is made with Linux, vs. how much is made because of it. While I know it'll be hard to find the former and impossible to determine the latter, I think comparing the two will still be revealing.
What I'm looking to do is unpack the a distinction Eric Raymond began making many years ago, between sale value and its use value. The number that matters most, of course, is the latter. Even if it's not entirely measurable, I'd like to see some ideas about getting close.
Got some?
__________________________
Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal
Special Magazine Offer -- Free Gift with Subscription
Receive a free digital copy of Linux Journal's System Administration Special Edition as well as instant online access to current and past issues. CLICK HERE for offer
Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook
Post to TwitterSubscribe now!
The Latest
Newsletter
Tech Tip Videos
Recently Popular
From the Magazine
December 2009, #188
If last month's Infrastrucuture issue was too "big" for you then try on this month's Embedded issue. Find out how to use Player for programming mobile robots, build a humidity controller for your root cellar, find out how to reduce the boot time of your embedded system, and if you're new to embedded systems find out the basics that go into one. You can also read about the Beagle Board, the Mesh Potato and a spate of other interestingly named items. And along with our regular columns don't miss our new monthly column: Economy Size Geek.
I enjoyed the quote from the
On May 24th, 2008 FredR says:
I enjoyed the quote from the most recent issue:
"The greatest shortcoming of the human race is the inability to understand the exponential function." -- Albert A. Bartlett
And to build on it, I would pose the question: Would you do something small, and insignificant, if the direct results were minor but there were massive exponential side effects?
__________________________-- FLR or flrichar is a superfan of Linux Journal, and goofs around in the LJ IRC Channel
Econometric Model
On May 7th, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
When you want to measure the economic value of something that seems to be intangible, you try to describe the situation with an econometric model. That model has variables that describe different components such as a+b+c= value. The variables may vary like 2a+4b(cubed)+the square root of c = value.
Here is the wiki link for econometrics
Doc, do you know anybody at Harvard that is in the economics department?
This is a complex question. Econometrics is the tool for the job.
Econometrics
On May 7th, 2008 Doc Searls says:
Thanks! Good advice. Appreciated.
I'm sure I'm not more than 2 degrees from somebody at Harvard or MIT who knows.
__________________________Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal
Two degrees plus or minus
On May 8th, 2008 Anonymous (not verified) says:
Doc,
I Googled Mit and Harvard for econometrics and the Harvard Economics Department has two professors that specialize in econometrics.
Susan Athey
Gary Chamberlain
You will have to describe all the factors that relate to Linux for each of your questions to build these models. I would dedicate a page to each to build your list and get as much input from the Linux community as you can to describe these questions. If a major factor is left out, the model will be incorrect.
Think of it in terms of describing a photograph or image.
blind to abundance
On May 7th, 2008 marekj (not verified) says:
We are blind to abundance.
My 12 year old would say 'you mean there was no internet when you were 12?'
Infrastructure is what we take for granted and so we are blind to it. One would have to experience lack of infrastructure to be present to the 'loss' that is in abundance when 'present'. In this context the 'loss' we would experience would be its 'use value' and not necessarily 'sale value'. The 'loss' experienced is the loss of 'value' that is created 'because' of that the abundance of infrastructure and not the infrastructure itself.
And it is necessary for us to be blind to our infrastructure sometimes, it frees us to create stuff without managing the infrastructure. My 2 year old does not manage the 'infrastructure' of her current living conditions. It is our job as parents to feed her and provide her a safe place to sleep. Our 2 year old then can dance and laugh and be a child and create memories of happy childhood (I hope) because she 'trusts' the 'infrustructure' we as parents provide. (I think mother nature arranged this kind of relationship of abundance).
Peace.
marekj
Post new comment