LDAP Series Part III - The Historical Secrets
The origins of LDAP begin with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) based in Geneva. ITU began setting email standards which required a directory of names (and other information) that could be accessed across networks in a hierarchical fashion not dissimilar to DNS. The result of their work resulted in the X.500 series of standards which defined DAP (Directory Access Protocol), the protocol for accessing a networked directory service.
Tim Howes, Steve Kille and Wengyik Yeong saw a better way to achieve the aims of ITU and published a proposal entitled X.500 Lightweight Directory Access Protocol in RFC 1487 during July 1993. Their abstract read as follows:
The protocol described in this document is designed to provide access to the Directory while not incurring the resource requirements of the Directory Access Protocol (DAP). This protocol is specifically targeted at simple management applications and browser applications that provide simple read/write interactive access to the Directory, and is intended to be a complement to the DAP itself.
Tim Howes of the University of Michigan led the development of LDAP supported by the National Science Foundation. From 1993 to 1997, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) published 13 RFCs related to LDAP and dozens since. In essence, the University of Michigan invented and created LDAP. Two open source projects resulted from the work at the University of Michigan – OpenLDAP and the Fedora Directory Server.
On April 22, 1996, in a press release, the University of Michigan announced that "Netscape (would) incorporate Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) directory service technology developed at the U-M into its World-Wide Web software." The University felt they had taken "a giant step toward having (a) global directory service on the Internet."
Netscape and the University partnered to create the Netscape Directory Server (NDS), which became the leading LDAP application in commercial use. Interestingly enough, Red Hat purchased NDS from AOL and open sourced its code. That resulted in delivery of Fedora Directory Server (FDS) to the Linux community.
The OpenLDAP Project was started in 1998 by Kurt Zeilenga. The project started by cloning the LDAP source code from the University Of Michigan. When attempting to access the original LDAP project, the page redirects you to the OpenLDAP project.
In essence, one could speculate that the OpenLDAP project became the successor of the University of Michigan project.
Subsequent Internet protocols have their origins in LDAP including the XML Enabled Directory (XED), Directory Services Markup Language (DSML), the Service Location Protocol (SLP) and the Service Provisioning Markup Language (SPML).
Of course, this short discussion requires mention of one other subsequent development - Active Directory (AD). Redmond utilized LDAP protocols to create AD, which demonstrates the remarkable potential of the founders' (Tim Howes, Steve Kille and Wengyik Yeong) work, which began back in 1993.
If you haven't delved into AD, you owe it to yourself to do so. The Linux community could use the AD blueprint to manage enterprises. That could extend the historical discussion of LDAP even further.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide