LDAP: Attributes and Keeping Them Simple

A consensus exists among many writers about jargon. Throw a bunch of undefined words at a reader and he or she will soon fall asleep. In fact, put one term in a paragraph that the reader doesn't understand and a page or two later sleep will start to creep and the reader will lose interest.

So, in spite of the what many technical writers practice, I thought I might give you a break. You don't need to know everything about LDAP directory components or the construction of an address book to begin understanding the technology behind directories.

To a person who wants to find the name and email address of someone, he or she wants to do a simple search to find it. Does that person need to know how the information got into the directory? Do they need to understand how the directory came into being? Think about that.

In Gerald Carter's book, "LDAP Administration", he addresses attributes in a way I find intimidating. Here's a little quote for you:

Attributes types and the associated syntax rules are similar to variables and data type declarations found in many programming languages. The comparison is not that big a stretch.

OK then. How about another way of discussing it. Attributes hold information you need in a directory. For example, they might contain someone's name, address, telephone numbers, employee numbers, the department in which he or she work, his or her job title, etc.

Many other attributes exist in directories and LDAP administrators organize those attributes using something we will discuss in the next installment.

So, get ready for the next bit of jargon called objectClasses. You should find that subject pretty interesting if I can manage to write about it without putting you into an altered state.



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Using jargon

Lampy Kinkiety's picture

Using jargon is not bad. The point is to explain the words in glossary. Of course the glossary must be published.

Keeping Them Simple

Pozycjonowanie Stron's picture

Nicely put, interesting post.


küvet's picture


Couldn't have said it better

Blogger's picture

You hit the nail on the head with this one. I always find myself disinterested in articles I read when I can't understand what the heck its talking about. Especially technical stuff. To be honest even some of your stuff. It just makes me feel dumb. Thats a compliment by the way :0

simple is better

maldeetuh's picture

Totally agree with you Tom, you nailed it


der-Vertrag's picture

Great,i think so to


Anonymous's picture

Well thank you, i must agree..