If You Love Your Desktop, Buy A GNOME
Financial troubles are an ever more common reality as the economic climate continues to venture through the monsoon season, and not-for-profit organizations are no exception. Such appears to be the case for the GNOME Foundation, the forces behind the venerable GNOME desktop, as the organization's 2009 budget is finalized and thoughts — and worries — turn to 2010.
Corporate sponsorship — an increasingly difficult creature to find — appears to have been the traditional financial staple for GNOME, paying for the foundation's projects and programs as well as providing salaries for its small number of staffers. According to John Palmieri, Board Treasurer, the foundation is fine for 2009, but is "projecting that without a significant influx of steady contributions" it will face a significant shortfall in 2010. From Palmieri's comments, the culprit appears to be the above-mentioned vanishing corporate contributions, though Foundation Executive Director Stormy Peters has reportedly been able to secure new sponsors, at least for 2009.
Ms. Peters, though a long-time GNOME fixture, is a relative newcomer as Executive Director, having been appointed to the position less than a year ago. It would appear to be her position — likely the greatest personnel-related expense for the foundation — that is most in jeopardy, as a shortfall in the 2010 budget would present a choice between retaining Ms. Peters and cutting project funding, a regrettable position for any group to find themselves in. Palmieri describes the prospect of losing the so recently gained Executive Director as a "real tragedy," saying that Ms. Peter's efforts at "kicking our butts" to obtain financing, finish existing projects, and begin new ones are "remarkable in themselves, and even more so in the current climate." On the prospect of losing her, he says quite succinctly: "[W]ithout her the Foundation will be less effective in its mission."
Efforts are underway to prevent such a shortfall, and there is ample time to turn the projections around, if supporters turn out in force. In January, the foundation launched a new Friends of GNOME program allowing individuals to make recurring donations at a $10 per month "Adopt A Hacker" level, as well as the option to give on a non-recurring basis beginning with a $25 "Associate" contribution and progressing to a $1200+ "Philanthropist" level. Palmieri, on behalf of the GNOME Board, asks those who have and those who haven't given to GNOME before to consider it now:
While we can look at this downturn as a time to tighten our belts, I would much rather look at this as an opportunity for the community to take a stake in the future of the Foundation and show that we are not exclusively reliant on corporate coffers to grow GNOME.
If you haven’t donated in the past, now is the time to start by becoming a Friend of GNOME or donating at any of the contribution levels. If you do currently donate to GNOME, look to see if you can contribute a tiny bit more on a monthly basis. Every little bit helps. Remember these funds go to programs like hackfests and putting on local conferences. It also goes to paying for our staff of two who along with the part time and overworked board construct the strategies for facilitating the growth of GNOME.
More information about giving to the GNOME Foundation can be found on its Friends of GNOME site. The 2009 GNOME Foundation budget is available from the foundation's mailing list.
Justin Ryan is the News Editor for Linux Journal.
Look for him in the #linuxjournal IRC channel.










This week 5 lucky Members will receive a copy of The Official Ubuntu Server Book by Benjamin Mako Hill and Linux Journal's very own Kyle Rankin. No entry necessary. Check back here early next week to find out who the lucky Online Members are.




Comments
Drop mono please!
I switched from XP to Ubuntu five months ago (got a nifty Asus eee PC 1000!) in order to boycott anything from Micro$oft. Now, I learn about this "mono" thing. No way will I support Gnome until/unless they drop it! What a friggin' shame.
Linux/Gnome/Mono
What is Mono and what is so objectionable about it?
I un Gnome , but I am unaware of the Mono thing.
What is Mono and Why is it Bad
Mono is an open-source project that lets you develop and run Microsoft .NET client and server applications on Linux.
Steven Vaughan-Nichols describes Mono thus:
“Mono is sponsored by Novell. Its led by noted open-source developer Miguel de Icaza...”
“Thanks to Mono, we now have the popular Linux programs such as the Banshee music player, Beagle search tool and F-spot photography program. With Mono, you can also now run Visual Basic programs on Linux. Mono is also working on porting Microsoft's Silverlight 1.0, a cross-browser, cross-platform plug-in for delivering richer Web user experiences in a project called Moonlight.”
All this sounds pretty good. So why do so many people object to Mono? Because it's a trap. Mono furthers Microsoft's agenda of killing Linux and destroying open source software. Linux developers who use mono are foolishly wandering down a primrose path. Vaughan-Nichols continues:
“Lets say a year from now, Microsoft... claim[s] that Mono contains code that was stolen from the .NET Framework reference source code. They point at their code, they point at the license, and sure enough, theres similar code. After all, both projects are implementing .NET; there will almost certainly be lines of code that looks alike.”
“Better still, from Microsoft's point of view, all they need to do is find one Mono programmer who has signed the license to look at the .NET Framework reference source code. With that "proof," they'll claim they've found their smoking gun.”
Using Mono makes it easy for Linux developers to take advantage of Microsoft's work, but the price for doing so is paid by compromising the free software ecosystem and exposing the entire community to the risk of patent litigation. It's not just the potential patents that are the problem, but the holder of those patents. In this case, it is Microsoft, which has been relentlessly attacking free and open source software for years, either directly or through sock-puppet companies, FUD campaigns and astro turf. Recently, Microsoft took TomTom to court over Linux and patents and won a settlement, because even though the patents were widely held to be specious, it costs a lot of money and time to fight Microsoft and it is easy just to settle. Who in the free softare community has that money and can put up with years and years of fighting nuisance patent lawsuits by Microsoft? The SCO debacle is a good example of this.
I suspect that the only reason Mono is included with Gnome is because Gnome was co-founded by Miguel de Icaza, who also started the Mono project. No other Linux desktop environments/window managers include Mono. Debian excludes it default from the distribution, and Fedora has excluded it from their live CD. KDE developers have been outspoken against Mono. After all, there is nothing that can be done in Mono that cannot be done using truly free and open technologies.
The few applications in Gnome that use Mono are easily replaced:
Zim can replace Tomboy (Mono)
gThumb can replace F-Spot (Mono)
Tracker, strigi, pinot can replace Beagle (Mono)
If you would like to remove mono completely, simply open Synaptic in Ubuntu and remove the following two packages:
1.mono-common
2. libmono0
Mono taints Gnome
I like Gnome and I would like help support the Gnome Foundation financially, but Mono taints the experience for me. In fact, because of Mono, I have been making contingency plans to move away from Gnome and have been exploring other desktop environments. Right now, I can use Gnome without using Mono, but if it ever gets to the point where I am compelled to use Mono (or Moonlight, or OOXML), then I will move to something else.
mono gone please.
I to will not donate to gnome until mono is removed.
Please remove mono from Gnome.
Please remove Mono - and all other Microsoft influence - from Gnome.
That is why Gnome is hurting.
I will not donate to Gnome until Mono is removed.
Thank you,
Epaminondas
KDE4 Suicide???
KDE4 Suicide??? Huh?? The KDE team clearly stated that 4.0 was an Alpha release. Unfortunately, Kubuntu, OpenSuse, and Mandriva dev teams didn't hear that message and incorporated 4.0 as a finished product into their GUI. This is what created the bad press about kde4.
As it is, kde4 is pretty incredible, and getting better all the time.
And while Gnome just doesn't feel right to me (although I have tried to like it because I like gnomes and the name Gnome, it just feels icky), I still hope the Gnome project continues to succeed. Parallel, but different, projects should tend to drive excellence in each other.
oh yes,
blame the distros.. as it was the KDE team hollering all over the place about how amazing KDE4 was and then at the last minute in a couple of postings they put "it's not ready" in fine print. They hyped the hell out of it in the media, and then they got burnt for it. And even now with KDE 4.2, KDE still sucks.
I will also not be giving money to Gnome.
A) B/c of the inclusion of mono
B) b/c of the plans I have seen for Gnome 3.0. It'll destroy itself like KDE did and I want no part of supporting that.
Gnome
I might be willing to pay $10 a year for Gnome (not a month--that's ridiculous for a DE) if, and only if they remove Mono completely, the developers listen to the users at least a little (as it is now, they are arrogant and dismissive of any just about any user input), and they slim Gnome down so it's usable on more lightweight systems.
At this point, I'd rather give the money to Openbox developers, since that's what I'm using so I don't have my CPU running at almost full capacity all the time (and my laptop is only a couple of years old, so it's not that lightweight).
as 15+ years user of fvwm,
as 15+ years user of fvwm, with peace in my hearth i can say:
Copmete or Die GNOME.
KDE4
Have any of you who are bashing KDE4 tried version 4.2.2? It works great on my machine.
Competition is a good thing, I want both KDE and Gnome to survive.
Variety and freedom of choice is what Linux is all about!
If any of your older machines don't have enough RAM to run either Gnome or KDE, give Xfce a try.
Gnome Must Be Forked
As a 10+ year Linux power user, I've watched KDE and Gnome go back and forth, along with various distributions. Why the KDE people committed project suicide with 4.x is uncertain, but the joke that is Gnome 2.x is not uncertain. I've watched Gnome with each release purposefully break their own apps/desktop by design. Just read Miguel de Icaza's blog (remember the Novell deal?) once to see the Microsoft/C# promo it is. No Linux user needs Microsoft/C# now or ever, but what we need is a fork of Gnome, replacing the 2.x morons with trusted/smart Linux people.
Remove Mono
With KDE 4 in shambles, many have turned to Gnome as a stable, useful desktop manager. This is a tragedy in itself because Gnome brings with it patent encumbered Mono. I would be glad to donate to the Gnome foundation as soon as Mono is removed. Until then, I will use LXDE and Enligtenment.
I second that..
True, I've never been a Gnome lover, but for the record, I still have my reservations concerning KDE 4.x. It may well be that at some moment in time I can be converted, but for the moment I'm "homeless", sheltering in the shambles that used to be KDE 3.x.
I feel that Gnome has turned against those who bought it to life, being an abomination of what it was intended to be. Gnome with Mono is DEAD. Period.
Like you, I'm looking at E17 in case I have to look for a new home.
What happened to free Free FREE software ? huh ?
What happened to free Free FREE software ? huh ?
your free software could do better !
Post new comment