IBM Lets Sun Set
Reports surfaced late this evening that computing giant IBM — which has been in talks for some time to buy Sun Microsystems — has pulled its $7 billion offer to buy the struggling company.
According to reports, IBM withdrew the offer after Sun's Board of Directors made "onerous" requests following IBM's decision to lower its offer for the firm. IBM initially offered $9.55 per share, but dropped that offer to $9.40 — less than a $1.00 premium on Sun's current stock price — due in part, it says, to the discovery that far more senior employees than originally expected are covered by "change of control" contracts. Such agreements cover senior executives — who often face replacement on acquisition — should the company be bought or otherwise come under the control of someone other than its Board.
Sun's Board, according to anonymous sources close to the negotiations, was worried about parts of the deal that would limit IBM's ability to pull out of the agreement — presumably, these concerns were the "onerous" guarantees which led to the breakdown. However, IBM's decision to walk — which terminates a contract between the two stipulating that no other deal would be pursued during the course of their talks — may prove a benefit for Sun, as it is now able to seek out deals with other companies, including IBM's rivals.
It is possible that IBM's decision is merely a tactical move, intended to scare Sun's Board into agreeing to the deal without any "onerous" provisos. If Sun seizes the opportunity to offer itself to IBM's arch-rivals, however, it may well be IBM that is scared into agreement, for fear of what its competitors would do should they acquire Sun instead. Indeed, the tactic may work doubly, initially motivating IBM's rivals to pursue a purchase — at a much better premium, of course — in the desire to prevent IBM from doing so, before forcing IBM back to the table.
Of course, it's also entirely possible that IBM has genuinely lost interest, and it could prove devastating to Sun if it turns out those IBM rivals never had any interest to begin with.
Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Peppermint 7 Released
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Sony Settles in Linux Battle
- Libarchive Security Flaw Discovered
- Maru OS Brings Debian to Your Phone
- Profiles and RC Files
- Git 2.9 Released
- Snappy Moves to New Platforms
- The Giant Zero, Part 0.x
- Understanding Ceph and Its Place in the Market
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide