IBM Lets Sun Set
April 5th, 2009 by Justin Ryan
Reports surfaced late this evening that computing giant IBM — which has been in talks for some time to buy Sun Microsystems — has pulled its $7 billion offer to buy the struggling company.
According to reports, IBM withdrew the offer after Sun's Board of Directors made "onerous" requests following IBM's decision to lower its offer for the firm. IBM initially offered $9.55 per share, but dropped that offer to $9.40 — less than a $1.00 premium on Sun's current stock price — due in part, it says, to the discovery that far more senior employees than originally expected are covered by "change of control" contracts. Such agreements cover senior executives — who often face replacement on acquisition — should the company be bought or otherwise come under the control of someone other than its Board.
Sun's Board, according to anonymous sources close to the negotiations, was worried about parts of the deal that would limit IBM's ability to pull out of the agreement — presumably, these concerns were the "onerous" guarantees which led to the breakdown. However, IBM's decision to walk — which terminates a contract between the two stipulating that no other deal would be pursued during the course of their talks — may prove a benefit for Sun, as it is now able to seek out deals with other companies, including IBM's rivals.
It is possible that IBM's decision is merely a tactical move, intended to scare Sun's Board into agreeing to the deal without any "onerous" provisos. If Sun seizes the opportunity to offer itself to IBM's arch-rivals, however, it may well be IBM that is scared into agreement, for fear of what its competitors would do should they acquire Sun instead. Indeed, the tactic may work doubly, initially motivating IBM's rivals to pursue a purchase — at a much better premium, of course — in the desire to prevent IBM from doing so, before forcing IBM back to the table.
Of course, it's also entirely possible that IBM has genuinely lost interest, and it could prove devastating to Sun if it turns out those IBM rivals never had any interest to begin with.
__________________________
Justin Ryan is the News Editor for Linux Journal.
Look for him in the #linuxjournal IRC channel.
Special Magazine Offer -- Free Gift with Subscription
Receive a free digital copy of Linux Journal's System Administration Special Edition as well as instant online access to current and past issues. CLICK HERE for offer
Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.
Subscribe now!
The Latest
Newsletter
Tech Tip Videos
- Nov-04-09
- Oct-29-09
- Oct-26-09
Recently Popular
From the Magazine
December 2009, #188
If last month's Infrastrucuture issue was too "big" for you then try on this month's Embedded issue. Find out how to use Player for programming mobile robots, build a humidity controller for your root cellar, find out how to reduce the boot time of your embedded system, and if you're new to embedded systems find out the basics that go into one. You can also read about the Beagle Board, the Mesh Potato and a spate of other interestingly named items. And along with our regular columns don't miss our new monthly column: Economy Size Geek.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook








Apple better for Sun?
On April 14th, 2009 Silverlokk (not verified) says:
Truth to tell, while I have positive feelings about IBM and Sun individually, I didn't have those same feelings about a merged IBM-Sun or a Sun absorbed into IBM. Too many product line conflicts, no synergy. How about Apple, whose enterprise strategy is at best questionable? They have the cash, they need an enterprise player, and they're certainly much better at marketing than Sun is. Would be interesting though how McNeally would fit in all this -- Silicon Valley, let alone a merged company, isn't big enough for the two egos :) Sun might continue though as an independent subsidiary, carrying on with their day-to-day but responsible to the Apple board (w/c would of course include some of the current Sun board).
I just hope they don't call the merged company Starapple.
Sun Microsystems: Sic Transit Gloria Mondi
On April 6th, 2009 dave shields (not verified) says:
See my post http://daveshields.wordpress.com/2009/04/06/sun-microsystems-sic-transit-gloria-mundi/ , which also includes links to my three other posts on this topic.
thanks,dave
http://firesampalmisano.wordpress.com
Too bad for Sun. Good news for Microsoft.
On April 5th, 2009 Anonymous (not verified) says:
This is sad. IBM was the best option for Sun. If any other company buys them out, the fate of technologies like Java and Solaris will be much less certain.
Post new comment