Firefox Looking To Lose The Flab - And The Flaw
March 26th, 2009 by Justin Ryan
Memory leaks and code exploits are a fact of life for both browser developers and their users — regardless of the specific browser in question. For the developers at Mozilla, both issues have been on their minds this week, as browser bugs of both sorts have been all over the news.
Perhaps because it's the second most-widely-used web browser in the world, not to mention being Open Source — and because expectations for the "market-leading" browser aren't particularly high — Firefox takes a good bit of flak whenever a new security hole or resource sink is discovered. The Mozilla devs — or, at least some of them — intended this week to be about memory management, and Mozilla's Co-Director of Developer Tools, Ben Galbraith, got the ball rolling on Monday with a blog post laying out plans for a new tool intended to make the process known as "garbage collection" — freeing up resources by clearing out objects no longer required in memory — a more transparent and manageable process.
According to Galbraith, the tool being proposed would make it possible to view current unrecoverable JavaScript objects, known as "the heap," along with the ability to determine why they are "noncollectable," as well as providing the opportunity to understand when collection starts and finishes, and by extension, how long it is taking. His blog post ended by encouraging members of the Mozilla community to step up and offer feedback on the proposal, something they likely were doing through Wednesday, when everyone's attention was redirected by a critical security glitch that apparently threatens every Firefox 3 user, regardless of platform.
Security researchers published code on Wednesday that reportedly would allow an attacker to load
unauthorized software on a target's computer simply by having the target view a specially-coded XML file. According to reports, Mozilla developers were blindsided by the bug and immediately raced to find a patch, a task they'd completed by this morning, adding it to next-week's Firefox 3.0.8 release. Because of the exploit, that release is now considered a "high-priority fire-drill security update" for all users.
__________________________
Justin Ryan is the News Editor for Linux Journal.
Look for him in the #linuxjournal IRC channel.
Special Magazine Offer -- Free Gift with Subscription
Receive a free digital copy of Linux Journal's System Administration Special Edition as well as instant online access to current and past issues. CLICK HERE for offer
Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.
Subscribe now!
The Latest
Newsletter
Tech Tip Videos
- Nov-19-09
- Nov-04-09
Recently Popular
From the Magazine
December 2009, #188
If last month's Infrastrucuture issue was too "big" for you then try on this month's Embedded issue. Find out how to use Player for programming mobile robots, build a humidity controller for your root cellar, find out how to reduce the boot time of your embedded system, and if you're new to embedded systems find out the basics that go into one. You can also read about the Beagle Board, the Mesh Potato and a spate of other interestingly named items. And along with our regular columns don't miss our new monthly column: Economy Size Geek.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook








It is about time. After
On March 27th, 2009 Anonymous (not verified) says:
It is about time. After Firefox 3.0.6 came out I nearly stopped using it. I started looking into other browsers like Opera, Konqueror, Galeon, ect...
But after the release of 3.0.7 it wasn't as bad. The memory leaks in Firefox are horrendous.
bout time firefox loses the
On March 27th, 2009 Anonymous (not verified) says:
bout time firefox loses the bloat it eats like 20% of my ram or more when its running. seems the longer its left on the worse it gets.
none
On March 26th, 2009 nsas (not verified) says:
@ the previous guy, actually you didn't read it properly. firefox won the poll, but the actual usage of firefox is much less than IE and it has been mentioned in the article.
2nd? Do you guys read each other?
On March 26th, 2009 Anonymous (not verified) says:
The article you linked to placed Firefox first, not second. Did you read it?
Post new comment