Fedora 10 Is - Supported - No More
Fedora 10 Is No More
All good things must come to an end, they say, and that is true of software as much as anything else. As new releases supplant the old, legacy versions receive a stay of execution to allow users the time to test and upgrade gracefully. When their time has come, however, they land in the coder's graveyard, which is exactly where the aging Fedora 10 found itself last week.
Fedora's legacy support policy is to support any given version until two new versions have been released, plus one month — the time-frame generally runs to thirteen months. Shortly thereafter, the old release is sent on its way: security and bug-fix patches are discontinued, and users are strongly urged to upgrade immediately. With the release of Fedora 12 in mid-November, the one-month countdown began for Fedora 10, and it received its final updates last week.
The official announcement of the release's retirement came on Friday, in the form of an email from Fedora Project Leader Paul Frields to the fedora-announce mailing list:
This announcement is a reminder that as of 2009-12-17, Fedora 10 has
reached its end of life for updates. As planned, last update pushes
to Fedora 10 were made in advance of this date, to accommodate the
move of some Fedora infrastructure.
Frields went on to note that the new legacy version, Fedora 11, will be supported until after Fedora 13 has been released.
__________________________
Justin Ryan is the News Editor for Linux Journal.
Look for him in the #linuxjournal IRC channel.
Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- Dart: a New Web Programming Experience
- Developer Poll
- What's the tweeting protocol?
- May 2013 Issue of Linux Journal: Raspberry Pi
- Reply to comment | Linux Journal
3 hours 20 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
4 hours 7 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
5 hours 41 min ago - Thanks for taking the time to
7 hours 17 min ago - Linux is good
9 hours 15 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
9 hours 33 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
10 hours 2 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
10 hours 3 min ago - Web Hosting IQ
10 hours 4 min ago - Reply to comment | Linux Journal
13 hours 4 min ago
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.



Comments
Create a new column
and a second note - I will do as I say about Linux and the Linux Lies. The Australian government didn't put Mandriva in their schools did they. Mandriva's urpmi can't even write to the Master Boot Record on half occasions of install therefore wasting thousands of hours in installations if the install persons don't know how to either load to the root partition or doesn't know how to debug the drive or use another Linux distro or DOS to prep the MBR. Mandriva even ignores the problem and cares not to fix it - even after being told of it. And if you do get Mandriva loaded - it's a dog and terrible with permissions on files and folders as well as users. Once the Australian government addressed these very items - Mandriva was tossed and Windows 7 took its rightful place. Why? Because when Linux developers became the deceptors that Microsoft has always been - it's time to correct the situation right away. Microsoft passed the tests. Linux did not. Simple and final. If you can't create a permissions system to function even as well as Microsoft's Active Directory - admit to it and get on with life until you can. Don't give presentation in front of unsuspecting Administrators of government offices and take advantage of using the people's moneys to make a profit and rave about something you cheated with. That's wrong and that is not what Linux is all about.
Thanks.
Miles Bradford
Stable releases
If you wish to keep from having to rebuild your workstation as often, you can always use one of the commercial releases (RHEL, Novell's SLED/SLES releases), Slackware, Debian, or one of the BSD series. Of course, the stable releases don't upgrade their support for new releases of applications, either.
What about Arch Linux?
I've read that Arch Linux has a continuous release cycle, meaning there are no 'versions' per se. Just one, constantly updating, installation.
Why I gave up on Fedora
This is precisely why I gave up Fedora and went to Ubuntu. I usually install the desktop version, and then add the server components. The support has been excellent, and the distro has been better than the required (by one vendor) RH EL, which does not seem to have as good Perl support.
I liked Fedora, but I'm not fond of rebuilding workstations at all, especially often.