Can we help AT&T solve its mobile data problem?
I'm in midtown Manhattan, connected to the Net over my hotel's slow but costly wi-fi connection. Normally when I'm traveling — at least here in the U.S. — I avoid lame hotel connections by using AT&T's cellular data system, usually through my iPhone's "personal hotspot."
But that doesn't work here, except in the wee hours, I assume because demand on the system is lower. But I don't know. Maybe you do. If so, perhaps this fodder will stoke the problem-solving fires:
PING google.com (184.108.40.206): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 220.127.116.11: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=101.064 ms
64 bytes from 18.104.22.168: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=92.423 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 2
Request timeout for icmp_seq 32
64 bytes from 22.214.171.124: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=31309.253 ms
64 bytes from 126.96.36.199: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=30364.809 ms
64 bytes from 188.8.131.52: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=28366.889 ms
64 bytes from 184.108.40.206: icmp_seq=7 ttl=51 time=26370.460 ms
64 bytes from 220.127.116.11: icmp_seq=10 ttl=51 time=23369.719 ms
64 bytes from 18.104.22.168: icmp_seq=12 ttl=51 time=21384.230 ms
64 bytes from 22.214.171.124: icmp_seq=14 ttl=51 time=19385.376 ms
64 bytes from 126.96.36.199: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=29390.279 ms
64 bytes from 188.8.131.52: icmp_seq=6 ttl=51 time=27393.178 ms
64 bytes from 184.108.40.206: icmp_seq=9 ttl=51 time=24401.894 ms
64 bytes from 220.127.116.11: icmp_seq=11 ttl=51 time=22405.324 ms
64 bytes from 18.104.22.168: icmp_seq=13 ttl=51 time=20404.648 ms
64 bytes from 22.214.171.124: icmp_seq=15 ttl=51 time=18448.794 ms
64 bytes from 126.96.36.199: icmp_seq=34 ttl=51 time=453.465 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 47
Request timeout for icmp_seq 58
64 bytes from 188.8.131.52: icmp_seq=35 ttl=51 time=24054.439 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 60
Request timeout for icmp_seq 87
--- google.com ping statistics ---
89 packets transmitted, 17 packets received, 80.9% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 92.423/20452.720/31309.253/10051.146 ms
There are two ways we can go with this information. One is to give crap to AT&T, or to me for using AT&T (and for using an iPhone... I also have an Android, btw & fwiw) — or to the futilities of trying to do anything serious over something so commercial and klugey as a cellular data system. The other is to help AT&T with a problem it clearly has, as technical folk. If we can.
That's the appeal here. What's going wrong? Inadequate provisioning of capacity? Bufferbloat? Something else?
There's another issue I want to explore with this exercise, and that's opening companies to help from the customer/user side. Companies like AT&T aren't set up for that. They're organized to heal themselves from the inside.This excludes more sources of help than it includes, especially when the problems are technical and there are technical people on the outside who have perspective and expertise, and can provide useful assistance.
It's easy to be cynical about the prospects of companies opening up to real outside help. It's harder to try breaking them open. But that's what I'm after in this case.
We've got a lot of technical readers here. Lots of those readers have mobile phones. Probably more than a few have the same problems (and not just with AT&T) that my phone is experiencing here. Why not help out?
Here's another factor to consider: it's still early. We've hardly begun to build out the infrastructure for what Bob Frankston calls "ambient connectivity." Chances are, once we have ambient connectivity, cellular telephony will not be what most of us are using at the lower layers of the stack. But we'll get to ambient connectivity (and nearer milestones) faster, methinks, if we help work kinks out of the systems we do have today, and mobile data over cellular connections is one of those systems.
Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal
|Contrast Security's Contrast Enterprise||Aug 30, 2016|
|illusive networks' Deceptions Everywhere||Aug 29, 2016|
|Happy Birthday Linux||Aug 25, 2016|
|ContainerCon Vendors Offer Flexible Solutions for Managing All Your New Micro-VMs||Aug 24, 2016|
|Updates from LinuxCon and ContainerCon, Toronto, August 2016||Aug 23, 2016|
|NVMe over Fabrics Support Coming to the Linux 4.8 Kernel||Aug 22, 2016|
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Contrast Security's Contrast Enterprise
- illusive networks' Deceptions Everywhere
- Happy Birthday Linux
- What I Wish I’d Known When I Was an Embedded Linux Newbie
- New Version of GParted
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- All about printf
- ContainerCon Vendors Offer Flexible Solutions for Managing All Your New Micro-VMs
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide