Behold, The Googlification Continues - Or Does It?
Google will eventually take over the world. Oh, sure, we delude ourselves into believing otherwise, but deep down inside we know that one day, gLife will come out of beta.
Everyone thought the biggest news to come out of the Googleplex yesterday was the announcement that four of the company's most popular offerings — Gmail, Google Docs, Google Calendar, and Google Talk — have left their long-held beta status behind, though the change appears to be mostly cosmetic, given the services well-established, if sometimes momentarily questioned, reliability. That news was, however, merely a foretaste of what was to come, as late last night the search giant revealed that it has even greater ambitions: to revolutionize the operating system.
According to the announcement, co-authored by Engineering Director Linus Upson and Product Management Vice President Sundar Pichai, Google believes that the operating systems currently on the market were "were designed in an era where there was no web," a fatal flaw, apparently, given the number of people who "live on the web," busily "searching for information, checking email, catching up on the news, shopping or just staying in touch with friends." Taking a cue — and the name — from it's 30,000,000+ strong web browser, Chrome, the company will develop an operating system to be christened Google Chrome OS.
The revelation is something of a pre-announcement, aimed at drumming up support — and, of course, publicity — for the offering. Like its Android mobile operating system and the Chrome browser, Google plans to Open Source the Chrome OS, and hopes the Open Source community will embrace it and actively assist in its development. Netbooks with the new OS are scheduled to appear sometime in the latter half of next year, an ambitious schedule to put together an entire operating system. Google says it is redesigning the "security architecture" to take viruses, malware, and security updates off of user's minds and plates.
The company says that while Chrome OS and Android — which is rapidly being ported to larger devices, including netbooks — will have some similarities, Chrome OS will be built to handle anything from netbooks to full desktops. They plan for the operating system to "start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds" and will "always run as fast as when [the users] first bought them," with a minimal interface centered around, you guessed it, the Chrome browser. The majority of the user's activities will take place online, no-doubt bearing tight integration with the aforementioned apps fresh out of beta.
When the grand announcement gets down to specs, however, it raises the question of whether "Chrome OS" is really a "new" operating system at all. "The software architecture is simple," it reads, "Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel."
Now, color us Linux geeks, but isn't that what those of us with more penguified personalities call a "Linux distribution"? The groundbreaking new features Google mentions are all fairly standard for Linux — fast boot times, including "instant on" Linux, updates that install all by themselves, and, of course, Linux's legendary security superiority.
There are already distributions — including one that, though the G in it's gOS stands for "Good" OS, could easily have been Google instead — that minimize traditional desktop applications and interfaces, including a number specifically designed for netbooks. As one reader we spoke with put it: "It is all the same - different bells and whistles, but it is the same bike. They took off the streamers and put baseball cards in the spokes instead."
Though we congratulate Google for wanting to make the user experience better and revolutionize computing, for using Linux to do it, and inviting the Open Source community to take the wheel, when it comes to creating a "brand new operating system" we're left asking "Where's the beef?"
Justin Ryan is a Contributing Editor for Linux Journal.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.View Now!
|The Firebird Project's Firebird Relational Database||Jul 29, 2016|
|Stunnel Security for Oracle||Jul 28, 2016|
|SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager||Jul 21, 2016|
|My +1 Sword of Productivity||Jul 20, 2016|
|Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!||Jul 19, 2016|
|Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)||Jul 18, 2016|
- The Firebird Project's Firebird Relational Database
- Stunnel Security for Oracle
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide