Be Careful What You Slash
February 2nd, 2009 by Justin Ryan
Facing malware is a way of life in the digital world, and the pressure on everyone from home users to corporate giants to do all they can to minimize its damaging effects is immense. Just how much pressure there is was made quite clear on Saturday morning, as a routine update to Google's list of malware sites went horribly wrong, labeling every site in the company's database as dangerous and rendering the service unusable.
The glitch, which appeared just before 9:30AM Eastern and had been resolved by 10:30AM, was caused by an update to the list of "badware" sites the company uses to warn searchers about the possibility of becoming infected. A stray / was introduced to the index, causing Google's search system to return a positive match for every URL in the search database. Google Vice President Marissa Mayer originally suggested the error arose from a list provided by the nonprofit StopBadware.org, but later clarified that the erroneous wildcard was introduced by Google personnel in a simple case of "human error." "What happened? Very simply, human error."
Google technicians quickly discovered the source of the issue and reverted the malware list, restoring service in less than an hour. Unfortunately, searchers who attempted to click through the warning generated while the bug was active were forcibly redirected to StopBadware.org, causing a denial-of-service to the organization's website as millions of Google users converged. Service was restored later in the day, though it continued to run slowly.
While the effect on Google's search engine results was widely reported by both technology publications and mainstream media, a concurrent bug was largely overlooked. The same filters used to flag search results are used by Google's Gmail service, and according to Google Software Engineer Brad Taylor, during the time the glitch was active, and for some time after, legitimate messages sent to some Gmail accounts were marked as spam and delivered to the user's junk mail folder. A fix was implemented on Sunday to restore erroneously marked messages to users' inboxes, though Taylor recommends users check their spam folders anyway, especially if they were expecting any messages from 9:00-11:00AM Eastern on Saturday morning.
Google vowed to look into the glitch and implement procedures to avoid a repeat of the glitch. Said Google's Mayer: "We will carefully investigate this incident and put more robust file checks in place to prevent it from happening again."
__________________________
Justin Ryan is the News Editor for Linux Journal.
Look for him in the #linuxjournal IRC channel.
Special Magazine Offer -- Free Gift with Subscription
Receive a free digital copy of Linux Journal's System Administration Special Edition as well as instant online access to current and past issues. CLICK HERE for offer
Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.
Subscribe now!
The Latest
Newsletter
Tech Tip Videos
- Nov-04-09
- Oct-29-09
- Oct-26-09
Recently Popular
From the Magazine
December 2009, #188
If last month's Infrastrucuture issue was too "big" for you then try on this month's Embedded issue. Find out how to use Player for programming mobile robots, build a humidity controller for your root cellar, find out how to reduce the boot time of your embedded system, and if you're new to embedded systems find out the basics that go into one. You can also read about the Beagle Board, the Mesh Potato and a spate of other interestingly named items. And along with our regular columns don't miss our new monthly column: Economy Size Geek.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Facebook








The service was not
On February 4th, 2009 Anonymous (not verified) says:
The service was not unusable. Google stil returned the results but you could not get to them. I went around the problem by copy-paste of the results url to the adress bar. It was a mere anoyance but i wouldn't say the service was unusable. And there are other search engines outhere, you`re not stuck with Google.
ah ha! I was wondering why
On February 3rd, 2009 Anonymous (not verified) says:
ah ha! I was wondering why all the sites were coming up as bad sites.. event yahoo answers!
Post new comment