All They Need Is Funds: A Call For Community Support
This entry is a little off my regular beat, but its substance is of great importance to all users of Linux audio software. To get straight to the point, it's about money and two projects in real need of significant financial support, the Ardour hard disk recorder/digital audio workstation and the Hydrogen rhythm programmer/drum machine. Both projects are well along in their development cycles, both have achieved great status not only in the Linux audio software world but on OSX as well, and both need financing for their planned evolution. Ardour and Hydrogen are two of Linux's finest programs for musicians, rivalling their commercial counterparts and providing libre alternatives to the intense vendor lock-in typical of the Win/Mac sound and music software worlds. These are truly important projects that deserve your support and financial backing.
First up, this announcement from Paul Davis, Ardour's chief designer :
"Ardour is looking for new project sponsors after our major contributor, Solid State Logic, informed us that a conflict of interest prevents them from continuing the financial support they gave to Ardour during 2006.
Ardour is at an exciting point in its development: version 2.0 is about to released very shortly, and more and more developers have recently started contributing to the project. Once version 2.0 is released, we have a large list of substantial new features waiting to be added, including MIDI recording and playback (already implemented as part of our participation in Google's Summer of Code). New work to add support for Mackie/Logic Control surfaces is already substantially completed.
However, despite the growing number of developers and the excitement of a 2.0 release, Ardour will not keep moving forward at an acceptable pace without at least one developer focused full time on it, and the end of SSL's funding will have a significant impact in this area. Paul Davis, Ardour's lead developer and founder, was paid entirely by SSL and is now seeking other ways of allowing him to continue working on Ardour as well as JACK.
We welcome continuing contributions via PayPal. However, we are also in an urgent search for corporations or orther organizations that see the long term value of Ardour as part of the audio technology environment. If you or your organization are interested in helping to establish and support a non-profit foundation dedicated to ensuring Ardour's continuing development, please get in touch with Paul (firstname.lastname@example.org)."
I've been testing and using Ardour2 for a while. Ardour is and has been an indispensable component in my Linux audio toolkit, and I suspect that's true for the majority of Linux sound & music people. I'll make a contribution via PayPal, as I hope you will too, but the matter at hand requires a more substantial and dependable source of funding. If you would like to see Linux continue on its way into the professional audio arena, please consider Paul's request. At the very least, please make a donation to the Ardour PayPal account. Whether or not you're a dedicated Ardourista, you'll help make the world a better-sounding place.
Next up, this message from Alessandro Cominu, aka Comix, the lead developer of the award-winning Hydrogen. I posted a query to the Hydrogen devel list regarding the project's future, this is Comix's reply :
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:15:14 +0100
Subject: Re: [Hydrogen-devel] Hydrogen development ?
On 12/11/06, Dave Phillips
> I've not checked out recent SVN sources, but watching the devel mail list I get the distinct impression that there's no internal development going on with Hydrogen.
> Almost all traffic on the list is concerned with translations. So, what's the story ? Is there a Hydrogen 1.0 in the works or is it a deader ?
> It would be a deep shame to see Hydrogen's development languish.
No no no... Hydrogen is not a dead project but currently I have to use my spare time for other projects. :( The real problem is always the same: money...I'm very low now and I can't work as usual on Hydrogen since it is a zero-profit project. It's sad, I know...but I have no alternative :-( As I said in the ML [mail list] I'm going to work on Hydrogen again during the Xmas vacation.
A big step forward [towards the 1.0 release] can be some donations or just someone that can help me in the development.
Have you some advice?
Linux User # 203765
Well, the best advice I can give is to the community: Help this project! Like Ardour, Hydrogen is an essential part of the recommended Linux audio applications suite. It is already a very sophisticated program, and it would indeed be a grave shame on the Linux community at large if an application of this order of excellence should lapse into the limbo of stalled development. We need Hydrogen, so if you'd like to help ensure its availability to current and future Linux-based musicians, please contact Comix and make an offer of assistance. You'll sleep better at night, and the world beat will love you.
Similis sum folio de quo ludunt venti.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide