Federated Desktop and File Server Search with libferris
The libferris project has two major goals: mounting anything as a filesystem and providing index and search for anything it can mount. Using libferris to provide desktop search was described in my February 2005 article, “Filesystem Indexing with libferris” in Linux Journal. The indexing capabilities of libferris have grown since then. One new feature is to allow a group of indexes to function logically as a single, “federated” index. This lets you have an index for your file server, another for your man pages and a third for your personal documents. You then can run queries against all three as though they were a single index.
libferris handles its index and search using a plugin system. There currently are index plugins for db4, PostgreSQL, ODBC, Redland (RDF), Xapian, Beagle, Yahoo, LDAP, CLucene, Lucene and external processes. The indexes that form a federated index in libferris can use any mixture of those index plugins.
libferris has two different types of indexing plugins: full text and metadata. The metadata interface of libferris is based on the Extended Attribute (EA) kernel interface. Having two index plugin types allows the index plugin to organize data on disk to best support queries.
A full-text index normally will maintain for each word from a human language a list of which files contain that word and a statistical measure of how important that word seems to the document. The statistic allows documents that are “more relevant” to be presented first in the results. Such statistics normally relate to how large a file is, how often the word appears in that file and how rare the occurrence of that word is across all indexed files.
A metadata index has to associate a docid with a keyword and value. For example, /tmp/foo has a size of 145. The metadata index has to be able to process queries, such as size>=4kb && modified this week, and efficiently return the docids for files that satisfy this query. The main difference between metadata and full-text index plugins is that the metadata queries contain value comparisons on metadata (for example, mtime>=last week), whereas full-text queries generally are more interested in the presence of a word in a file.
From an index user's point of view, having this distinction is an annoying implementation artifact. To get around this, a full-text index can be linked to a metadata index using the feaindex-attach-fulltext-index command. Queries combining both metadata and full-text searching can then be executed on the metadata index. It is convenient to think of the metadata index as owning the full-text index.
The metadata query format reserves any metadata names starting with ferris- to have special meaning. A metadata name ferris-fulltext-query or ferris-ftx will execute its query value as a full-text query on the linked full-text index. Shown in Listing 1 is a metadata query seeking all files under a given size with the two given words in them. If instead of combining the results with &, we used the or operator | in the query, any results matching either subquery would be returned. To query a full-text index, the findexquery command is used. Combined metadata and full-text indexes are queried using the metadata query command feaindexquery.
Listing 1. A Combined Full-Text and Metadata Index Query
$ feaindexquery \ '(&(size<=250k)(ferris-ftx==alice wonderland))'
The above discussion of docids becomes relevant when combining two types of index plugins like this. The greatest efficiency can be gained when both the metadata and full-text index plugins are using the same storage—for example, the PostgreSQL (metadata) and TSearch2 (full-text) plugins using the same underlying PostgreSQL database, or both indexes using the same CLucene storage.
The efficiency is obtained because each URL has the same docid. Using the PostgreSQL combination as an example, to resolve the query from Listing 1, the full-text subquery will be run against the TSearch2 plugin obtaining a set of matching docids. The set of docids matching the size query is obtained, and the set intersection of the size and full-text query results is returned. This final step can be done only if it is known that both the metadata and full-text index have the same docid for the same URL. Otherwise, the docids from the full-text query have to be converted into URL strings and then into the docids of the metadata index first.
When using a metadata and full-text plugin together like this, make sure that each file is added to both indexes.
Each metadata index plugin will automatically detect if it is safe to use the docids of the full-text index directly that is linked to it.
The federation index plugin is a metadata plugin. A federation is formed using many metadata indexes with one nominated as the writable index. As each metadata index can own a full-text index, this allows federations of an arbitrary number of full-text and metadata indexes. Each index in the federation can be updated independently of the federation.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
|Fancy Tricks for Changing Numeric Base||May 29, 2016|
|Working with Command Arguments||May 28, 2016|
|Secure Desktops with Qubes: Installation||May 28, 2016|
|CentOS 6.8 Released||May 27, 2016|
|Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction||May 27, 2016|
|Chris Birchall's Re-Engineering Legacy Software (Manning Publications)||May 26, 2016|
- Tips for Optimizing Linux Memory Usage
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction
- Working with Command Arguments
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Installation
- Fancy Tricks for Changing Numeric Base
- CentOS 6.8 Released
- Linux Mint 18
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Petros Koutoupis' RapidDisk
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide