Kernel Korner - Easy I/O with IO Channels
where gio is the applicable IO Channel, condition is a bitmask of the triggered events and data is the last argument given to g_io_add_watch().
If the return value of the callback is FALSE, the watch is automatically removed.
In our example program in Listing 1, we create two watches, one for each of our IO Channels.
The Glib library provides three basic interfaces for reading from an IO Channel.
The first, g_io_channel_read_chars(), is used to read a specific number of characters from an IO Channel into a pre-allocated buffer:
GIOStatus g_io_read_chars (GIOChannel *channel,
gchar *buf,
gsize count,
gsize *bytes_read,
GError **error);
This function reads up to count bytes from the IO Channel channel into the buffer buf. Upon successful return, bytes_read will point to the number of bytes actually read. On failure, error will point to a GError structure.
The return value is an integer with one of four values: G_IO_STATUS_ERROR (an error occurred), G_IO_STATUS_NORMAL (success), G_IO_STATUS_EOF (end-of-file was reached) or G_IO_STATUS_AGAIN (resource temporarily unavailable, try again).
The second interface, g_io_channel_read_line(), is used to read an entire line from a given IO Channel. It will not return until a newline-delimited line is read:
GIOStatus
g_io_channel_read_line (GIOChannel *channel,
gchar **str_return,
gsize *length,
gsize *terminator_pos,
GError **error);
Upon successful return, str_return will contain a pointer to a newly allocated block of memory of length bytes. terminator_pos is the offset into str_return of the terminating character. The data returned by this function must be freed via a call to g_free().
The final interface, g_io_channel_read_to_end(), reads all remaining data from the file into the given buffer:
GIOStatus g_io_channel_read_to_end (GIOChannel *channel,
gchar **str_return,
gsize *length,
GError **error);
Upon successful return, str_return will contain a pointer to a newly allocated block of memory of length bytes, which must be freed via g_free().
This function should not be used on IO Channels that map to file descriptors that do not necessarily return end-of-file when exhausted of data. For example, we could not use this function in our example program, because pipes do not return end-of-file until the other side has closed its end of the connection. Thus, our example would block indefinitely if we use g_io_channel_read_to_end().
Instead, in our example, we use g_io_channel_read_line() to read an entire line from the pipe.
Glib provides a single interface for writing to an IO Channel:
GIOStatus
g_io_channel_write_chars (GIOChannel *channel,
const gchar *buf,
gssize count,
gsize *bytes_written,
GError **error);
A successful call to g_io_channel_write_chars() will write up to count bytes from the buffer pointed at by buf into the file represented by the IO Channel channel. If count is negative one, buf will be treated as a NULL-delimited string. On return, bytes_written contains the actual number of bytes written.
Like C's Standard I/O Library, IO Channels perform buffered I/O to optimize performance. Thus, a write request may not actually be submitted to the kernel after each call to g_io_channel_write_chars(). Instead, glib may wait until a sufficiently large buffer is full and then submit the write request, in one large swoop.
The g_io_channel_flush() function is used to force a submission of any pending write requests to the kernel:
GIOStatus
g_io_channel_flush (GIOChannel *channel,
GError **error);
Buffering can be turned off altogether, if so desired:
g_io_channel_set_encoding (gio, NULL, NULL); g_io_channel_set_buffered (gio, FALSE);
The second function disables buffering. The first sets the IO Channel's encoding to NULL, which is required for disabling buffering.
In our example program, we use g_io_channel_write_chars() to write a small string to the pipe. We do not mess with the buffering of the IO Channel.
Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.
Sponsored by AMD
Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.
Sponsored by DLT Solutions
| Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds) | May 16, 2013 |
| Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This | May 15, 2013 |
| Home, My Backup Data Center | May 13, 2013 |
| Non-Linux FOSS: Seashore | May 10, 2013 |
| Trying to Tame the Tablet | May 08, 2013 |
| Dart: a New Web Programming Experience | May 07, 2013 |
- RSS Feeds
- New Products
- Making Linux and Android Get Along (It's Not as Hard as It Sounds)
- Drupal Is a Framework: Why Everyone Needs to Understand This
- Home, My Backup Data Center
- A Topic for Discussion - Open Source Feature-Richness?
- Dart: a New Web Programming Experience
- Developer Poll
- What's the tweeting protocol?
- May 2013 Issue of Linux Journal: Raspberry Pi
Enter to Win an Adafruit Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi

It's Raspberry Pi month at Linux Journal. Each week in May, Adafruit will be giving away a Pi-related prize to a lucky, randomly drawn LJ reader. Winners will be announced weekly.
Fill out the fields below to enter to win this week's prize-- a Prototyping Pi Plate Kit for Raspberry Pi.
Congratulations to our winners so far:
- 5-8-13, Pi Starter Pack: Jack Davis
- 5-15-13, Pi Model B 512MB RAM: Patrick Dunn
- Next winner announced on 5-21-13!
Free Webinar: Linux Backup and Recovery
Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.
In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.




11 min 56 sec ago
46 min 49 sec ago
1 hour 9 min ago
5 hours 57 min ago
6 hours 44 min ago
8 hours 18 min ago
9 hours 55 min ago
11 hours 52 min ago
12 hours 10 min ago
12 hours 40 min ago