Resources for “Compression Tools Compared”
July 21st, 2005 by Kingsley G. Morse Jr. in
Resources for the print article.
__________________________
lzop: www.lzop.org
rzip: rzip.samba.org
lzma: martinus.geekisp.com/rublog.cgi/Projects/LZMA
p7zip and lzma: adn.diwi.org/debian
Various: sourceforge.net
SSH and scp: www.rpmseek.com
Canterbury Corpus: corpus.canterbury.ac.nz
Calgary Corpus: links.uwaterloo.ca/calgary.corpus.html
Subscribe now!
Breaking News
| Ratings, Ratings, Who's Got the Ratings? | 23 hours 41 min ago |
| British Balk at Government Getting a Discussion Database | 2 days 56 min ago |
| Yahosoft is Back, On the Light Menu | 2 days 2 hours ago |
| When Tragedy Begets Tragedy | 3 days 1 hour ago |
Featured Video
Linux Journal's own Shawn Powers tells the story of Ubuntu and his family of distributions as they search for their identities.
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Newsvine
Technorati






rzip looked promising. I
On December 6th, 2005 Anonymous (not verified) says:
rzip looked promising. I started hacking it a bit here and there mainly in main.c and in the stream.c and got rid of libbz in it so now I may use it as preprocessor before gzip.
I threw urandom data at this hacked variant and was not able to decompress what was compressed at -0 and -1 levels. Then i runned original rzip-2.0 against the same urandom data and it shows same bug.
So the hint is: Don't use version 2.0 (rzip.samba.org OR debian's 2.0-2) with compression levels -0 and -1 for anything inmportant before first checking if you can decompress. Other levels were fine with same data but I was not giving it any heavy testing.
Still it's able to cut in 10 minutes from 6538537833B of mail+spam down to 4466144683B at compression level 0 (these data decompresses cleanly) here and that is the hacked version without bzip2 - only rzip's own part. Yet the hacked variant without bzip at level -9 is terribly slow - but the system was swapping/trashing/mmaping(comparing large chunks of data) heavily
LZMA 0.03-1 source
On August 6th, 2005 Charles Hewson (not verified) says:
If anyone finds working lzma please post the URL and/or email me. I have found 0.03 and 0.04 versions on sites above but neither works as documented in article. I have tried 2.4.26 & 2.6.11 kernels. The -x -s26 switches simply return the word "error" and do nothing. Without switches 0.03 encodes but will not decode. I never got 0.04 to encode.
Oops - Forgot to Include Source Location ..
On September 5th, 2005 Graham K Jenkins (not verified) says:
The version I used was LZMA 4.27 on Fedora Core 4.
You can find it at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sevenzip
Ciao ..
Working lzma
On September 4th, 2005 Graham K Jenkins (not verified) says:
I have compiled and used it on Fedora Core, using both 32-bit Intel and 64-bit AMD machines.
Hope this helps.