Resources for “Compression Tools Compared”

July 21st, 2005 by Kingsley G. Morse Jr. in

Resources for the print article.
Your rating: None
__________________________


Special Magazine Offer -- Free Gift with Subscription
Receive a free digital copy of Linux Journal's System Administration Special Edition as well as instant online access to current and past issues. CLICK HERE for offer

Linux Journal: delivering readers the advice and inspiration they need to get the most out of their Linux systems since 1994.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Anonymous's picture

rzip looked promising. I

On December 6th, 2005 Anonymous (not verified) says:

rzip looked promising. I started hacking it a bit here and there mainly in main.c and in the stream.c and got rid of libbz in it so now I may use it as preprocessor before gzip.

I threw urandom data at this hacked variant and was not able to decompress what was compressed at -0 and -1 levels. Then i runned original rzip-2.0 against the same urandom data and it shows same bug.

So the hint is: Don't use version 2.0 (rzip.samba.org OR debian's 2.0-2) with compression levels -0 and -1 for anything inmportant before first checking if you can decompress. Other levels were fine with same data but I was not giving it any heavy testing.

Still it's able to cut in 10 minutes from 6538537833B of mail+spam down to 4466144683B at compression level 0 (these data decompresses cleanly) here and that is the hacked version without bzip2 - only rzip's own part. Yet the hacked variant without bzip at level -9 is terribly slow - but the system was swapping/trashing/mmaping(comparing large chunks of data) heavily

Charles Hewson's picture

LZMA 0.03-1 source

On August 6th, 2005 Charles Hewson (not verified) says:

If anyone finds working lzma please post the URL and/or email me. I have found 0.03 and 0.04 versions on sites above but neither works as documented in article. I have tried 2.4.26 & 2.6.11 kernels. The -x -s26 switches simply return the word "error" and do nothing. Without switches 0.03 encodes but will not decode. I never got 0.04 to encode.

Graham K Jenkins's picture

Oops - Forgot to Include Source Location ..

On September 5th, 2005 Graham K Jenkins (not verified) says:

The version I used was LZMA 4.27 on Fedora Core 4.

You can find it at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/sevenzip

Ciao ..

Graham K Jenkins's picture

Working lzma

On September 4th, 2005 Graham K Jenkins (not verified) says:

I have compiled and used it on Fedora Core, using both 32-bit Intel and 64-bit AMD machines.

Hope this helps.

Post new comment

Please note that comments may not appear immediately, so there is no need to repost your comment.
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Newsletter

Each week Linux Journal editors will tell you what's hot in the world of Linux. You will receive late breaking news, technical tips and tricks, and links to in-depth stories featured on www.linuxjournal.com.
Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Tech Tip Videos

From the Magazine

December 2009, #188

If last month's Infrastrucuture issue was too "big" for you then try on this month's Embedded issue. Find out how to use Player for programming mobile robots, build a humidity controller for your root cellar, find out how to reduce the boot time of your embedded system, and if you're new to embedded systems find out the basics that go into one. You can also read about the Beagle Board, the Mesh Potato and a spate of other interestingly named items. And along with our regular columns don't miss our new monthly column: Economy Size Geek.


Read this issue