At the Forge - Sharing Calendars
Over the last few months, we have explored the iCalendar standard and the ways in which it allows us to create our own calendars, as well as work with remote ones.
But if you think about it for a moment, you'll realize we are missing a key piece of functionality. We have seen how easy it is to create our own local calendars. We have seen how we can retrieve remote calendars. We have even seen how we can create and distribute remote calendars, generating events dynamically from a Web/database application. But we have never considered how an individual Sunbird user might be able to share his or her calendar with other people.
Anyone who has worked in even a medium-sized organization knows that scheduling appointments can be difficult. Having access to everyone's calendar, and being able to schedule meetings for them, is an increasingly useful feature for our software to have. If every change I make to my calendar is available for everyone to see, it will be easier for them to schedule meetings when I will be around. (Or when I won't be around, if they want to keep something secret from me.) I used to ask clients why they use Microsoft Exchange as a mail server, given the availability of excellent open-source alternatives; inevitably, the answer would have more to do with the calendar support in Outlook and Exchange, rather than the e-mail functionality.
This month, we close our exploration of Sunbird and iCalendar with a look at how we can publish calendars to a central repository for others to share. The results might not be as slick or smooth as some of the commercial alternatives, but as with many other types of software in the open-source world, I believe that this is rapidly changing, and that we soon will see open-source calendar servers that are equal or superior to their proprietary counterparts.
Before we try to share a calendar, we should define exactly what we mean by sharing. You might think that shared calendars are stored in a single place and accessed by multiple calendar programs simultaneously. Although it is theoretically possible to configure Sunbird, or any other iCalendar-compatible program, such as Evolution, in this way, this is not what we would typically expect.
Basically, a shared calendar in the iCalendar world is an iCalendar file that is available for retrieval from a publicly accessible server. That iCalendar file might be updated once per hour or once per year; much like an RSS feed or a Weblog, there is no way to know how often a particular calendar file might be updated. For this reason, we need to make several assumptions: 1) everyone who is interested in this particular calendar is subscribed to it; 2) every subscriber downloads an updated version of the calendar on a regular basis, at least once per day; and 3) the calendar's manager publishes all changes and updates to the public server as soon as they are made.
In other words, the sharing does not take place in real time at all, but rather depends on all of the participating users to publish and retrieve updates on a regular basis. Between updates, a calendar user sees only the most recently downloaded iCalendar file, which is stored on his or her local computer. If a calendar subscriber is scheduled to retrieve updates only once per day, it is quite possible that he or she will miss last-minute updates to the calendar. Just how often someone should subscribe to calendar updates depends on the nature of the organization, how important it is to get updates and the load that might be placed on the server. After all, a server that can provide daily updates to 100 people might have trouble providing hourly updates to 10,000 people.
The easiest way to publish files on the Web is to use the old standby for file transfer, FTP. FTP has gone almost unused on my server for some time now, in no small part because of security concerns, but if you are working on a system that is properly secured, or if you would rather not use WebDAV (described below), FTP is a workable and simple way to share Web calendars.
On my server, running ProFTPd, I decided to create a new user (calendar) with a password (cal4atf). To ensure that this user cannot be used for remote logins or other mischief, I would like to give it a shell of /sbin/nologin, or perhaps /bin/false—both of which are programs that simply exit, without giving a malicious user any chance to log in and take advantage of my system. The problem with this approach is that FTP servers allow only users whose shell is in /etc/shells to log in. This presents us with something of a dilemma. We want to give the calendar user a non-interactive shell, but we also want the user to be able to use FTP. But, adding /sbin/nlogin to /etc/shells might open a security hole on our system. A simple solution is to copy /sbin/nologin to /sbin/nologin-but-yesftp and to add a line in /etc/shells with the latter shell's name.
Normally, non-anonymous users logging in via FTP are shown their own home directories. By default, ProFTPd goes one step further than this, forbidding users from going outside of their own home directories. Thus, we can rest assured that even if a malicious user gets a hold of our calendar user name and password, the worst that he or she can do is destroy or modify our calendar files. This is obviously not something we want to encourage, and in a production environment, you undoubtedly would want better security—giving everyone a unique user name and password, for example. But for this simple demonstration, we will forge ahead with our single calendar user, knowing that a security breach might well take our shared calendar files with it.
Assuming that we have configured FTP appropriately, how can we publish our calendar? From within Sunbird, we select the calendar we want to publish, which is called My Calendar by default. A menu pops up, the last option of which says, Publish entire calendar. If you select this option, a small dialog box opens, asking for the URL to which you intend to publish the calendar.
It goes without saying that the URL will begin with ftp://, but what comes after that? Assuming that the user name and password are as we indicated above, and that the server is calendar.lerner.co.il, we can access it as ftp://calendar:email@example.com/calendar.ics.
As you can see, we separate the user name and password with colons, and then put an @ sign between the password and the server name. Following the server is the name of the file we want to save. Although theoretically it can have any name or suffix, the .ics suffix is considered quite standard and ensures that all of the programs involved will understand the MIME types.
Now, let's say I make a change to my calendar. Must I now manually upload it to the server, going through this same procedure again? No, there is a way around this. Click on the calendar's name to get the same menu that you have already seen. Instead of selecting Publish entire calendar, select Edit calendar. This opens a dialog box that includes, among other things, a text field into which you can enter a URL, as well as a check box indicating that the calendar should be published whenever a change is made. I had mixed results using this functionality, although it worked more often than not and did a good job of keeping my appointments synchronized on different systems.
Subscribing to the shared calendar is similar to publishing it. Enter the full URL, including user name and password, and any iCalendar-compatible program should retrieve and display it. Of course, the configuration that we have put in place requires that the program can handle HTTP authentication.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- ServersCheck's Thermal Imaging Camera Sensor
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Petros Koutoupis' RapidDisk
- Linux Mint 18
- Oracle vs. Google: Round 2
- The FBI and the Mozilla Foundation Lock Horns over Known Security Hole
- Privacy and the New Math
- Ben Rady's Serverless Single Page Apps (The Pragmatic Programmers)
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide