From the Editor - Security

The security message is closing Linux migration deals. Now it's up to us to deliver the secure environment people want.

You can talk about cost savings, performance and flexibility all you want, but the advantage driving more and more companies toward Linux is security. Just look how much time the big cheeses in the proprietary OS business spend telling the media about their catch-up plans. Thanks to some bad mistakes in the design of one vendor's browser and mail client, CIOs are asking vendors for Linux answers faster than the vendors were expecting.

Some OSes are born ubiquitous, others attain ubiquity and Linux is having ubiquity thrust upon it. Customer pull is nothing new to the Linux vendors, and they'll cope. And for you, the Linux professional, it's opening night at the big show. Everyone bought a ticket to see the amazing singing, dancing, secure operating system. They're waiting for the curtain to go up, and you're the stage manager.

Don't panic. Security depends more on policies and attention to detail than on any program or product. And you have a secret weapon. As you move more systems to Linux, you can start enforcing more secure policies and conceal the changes in the smoke and mirrors of the OS migration. If anyone points out that you could relax security to the way you had it in your old OS, you can say “that's the way it's normally done under Linux.” Yes, Linux will get some of the credit for your good decisions, but you'll get credit for putting in Linux.

Everyone will tell you to run Nmap to keep track of open ports and get an early warning of unnecessary or misconfigured software, but when you're keeping track of thousands of systems, that's a lot of data to watch. Log your Nmap data to an SQL database with Hasnain Atique's article on page 56.

Makan Pourzandi and Axelle Apvrille are bringing security to the Linux cluster environment (page 64). If you're sharing a cluster among multiple project teams, have a look.

SELinux is one of the most promising developments in Linux security, and it's worth keeping an eye on. No more will an attacker be able to “get root” on a whole system by compromising one dæmon. I'm planning to use SELinux at first for simple bastion hosts such as name servers, then add it to other systems as the administration tools get better. SELinux is complicated, though, so watch Linux Journal for more articles about it. James Morris explains SELinux and filesystems on page 22.

Finally, we normally don't bother with making fun of proprietary operating systems, because we're just quietly replacing them and interoperating with them where they're still in use. But Marcel Gagné got a little too annoyed by the latest batch of worms targeting other OSes that clobbered his network, so he blew off a little steam with some games on page 30. Have fun, keep your systems secure and enjoy the issue.

Don Marti is editor in chief of Linux Journal.

______________________

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: From the Editor -- October 2004: Security

Anonymous's picture

"Several sites noted that migration to Open Source desktops provided an opportunity for revising work practices and operational standards, as well as procedures for administration, system management and security."

Her Majesty's Open Source report

Re: From the Editor -- October 2004: Security

Anonymous's picture

The coming years are going to be testing times for GNU/Linux for sure, it can only attract more attention from "evil doers". The Linux community needs to keep, and enforce, the "security as a process" policy we have all practiced since day one, and then educate new arrivals on doing the same.

A closer look at SELinux would be greatly appreciated!

Re: From the Editor -- October 2004: Security

Anonymous's picture

This is what Linux is all about. I do not know whether we should be happy or sad, that nobody noticed this article. One thing is obvious though, those that care do not advertise their identities, and more importantly do not wish to reveal more than is needed to the flies circling the honey pot.

White Paper
Fabric-Based Computing Enables Optimized Hyperscale Data Centers

Today’s modular x86 servers are compute-centric, designed as a least common denominator to support a wide range of IT workloads. Those generic, virtualized IT workloads have much different resource optimization requirements than hyperscale and cloud applications. They have resulted in a “one size fits all” enterprise IT architecture that is not optimized for a specific set of IT workloads, and especially not emerging hyperscale workloads, such as web applications, big data, and object storage. In this report, you will learn how shifting the focus from traditional compute-centric IT architectures to an innovative disaggregated fabric-based architecture can optimize and scale your data center.

Learn More

Sponsored by AMD

White Paper
Red Hat White Paper: Using an Open Source Framework to Catch the Bad Guy

Built-in forensics, incident response, and security with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Every security policy provides guidance and requirements for ensuring adequate protection of information and data, as well as high-level technical and administrative security requirements for a system in a given environment. Traditionally, providing security for a system focuses on the confidentiality of the information on it. However, protecting the data integrity and system and data availability is just as important. For example, when processing United States intelligence information, there are three attributes that require protection: confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Learn more about catching the bad guy in this free white paper.

Learn More

Sponsored by DLT Solutions