At the Forge - Syndication with RSS
The good news, as we have seen, is that RSS 1.0 is not significantly more difficult to create or parse than RSS 0.91 was, assuming you are using decent tools. However, the complexity of RSS 1.0 was seen as unnecessary by some.
Indeed, after several attempts to reach a consensus on RSS 1.0, a number of developers banded together to work on something now known as Atom. Although discussion of Atom will have to wait until next time, this spurred the RSS camp (led by Winer) to produce RSS 2.0.
You can produce RSS 2.0-compatible feeds by changing the version number in the invocation of new:
my $rss = new XML::RSS (version => '2.0');
You must say 2.0; neither 2 nor 2.00 will work, because the version check uses a string comparison, rather than a numeric one.
What does RSS 2.0 look like? Well, you might be surprised:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel= "http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"> <channel> <title>Altneuland</title> <link>http://altneuland.lerner.co.il/</link> <description>Reuven Lerner's Weblog </description> <language>en</language> <item> <title>Being scared</title> <link>http://altneuland.lerner.co.il/43/index_html</link> <description>Blog entry</description> </item> </channel> </rss>
This looks a lot like RSS 0.91 and, thus, seems like a stripped-down version of RSS 1.0. But when we remember that RSS 2.0 is a successor to 0.91 and is designed to fix some of its flaws while remaining small, simple to implement and flexible, it becomes more obvious.
RSS 2.0 includes a number of improvements over 0.91, most especially the idea of using namespaces as modules that add new functionality. RSS 2.0 doesn't define or use nearly as many namespaces as 1.0 does, but that's because it is not trying to implement RDF.
Partly because of criticism that he personally held the copyright to the RSS 2.0 specifications, Winer gave ownership to Harvard University. It is assumed that Winer will continue to play a major role in the development of RSS 2.0, but he will no longer be the final arbiter regarding usage or extensions.
However, the split seems to be final; there is now an Atom camp and an RSS camp, and I find it hard to believe they will meet. But given the conflicting goals they have set for themselves, this should not come as a surprise—after all, you cannot expect to have flexibility and ease of implementation in the same specification.
This month, we looked at the different flavors of RSS currently in use and compared their different styles and project goals. Luckily, someone who wants to produce a bare-bones syndication feed does not need to work very hard. Although programmers can add some version-specific fields, the basics are the same for all versions of RSS, even those that are ostensibly incompatible. The resulting RSS feeds, of course, can look quite different, depending on which version is used.
Next column, we will look at the upstart Atom syndication format, which is growing rapidly as a competitor to RSS. Once we have done that, we will look at how to build our own news aggregator, allowing us to interpret and work with syndication feeds from a wide variety of sources. We also will consider different ways in which RSS can be used and how aggregators can provide more than the latest news and opinions.
Resources for this article: /article/7702.
- Bruce Nikkel's Practical Forensic Imaging (No Starch Press)
- Transitioning to Python 3
- Progress on Privacy
- Stepping into Science
- Linux Journal December 2016
- Radio Free Linux
- The Tiny Internet Project, Part II
- CORSAIR's Carbide Air 740
- FutureVault Inc.'s FutureVault
- A Better Raspberry Pi Streaming Solution