At the Forge - XOOPS
Over the last few months, we've been looking at content management software (CMS) that makes it easy to create Weblogs, personal journals that continue to grow in popularity and influence. There are no hard-and-fast rules as to what constitutes a Weblog (or blog), but most people probably would agree that the contents typically are short articles, with the newest ones displayed first.
But there is a larger, slightly different, class of Weblogs out there as well, which probably can be called Slashdot-style, for lack of a better term. These Weblogs are edited by a small group of people but have a large number of contributors. In many ways, these are closer to on-line forums or bulletin boards than to Weblogs. However, such software also provides Weblog capabilities for its individual members. That is, a visitor to the site can read the main discussion, create his or her own Weblog and read through other users' Weblogs as well.
Although some packages—most notably Slash, which powers Slashdot, use.perl.org and some other high-profile sites—were designed around the idea of public and private Weblogs, other packages have grown to incorporate this idea. One such package is XOOPS, which supposedly stands for Extended Object Oriented Portal System. XOOPS is an outgrowth of the PHPNuke and PostNuke family of portal servers.
This month, we look at XOOPS, paying particular attention at WeBLog (pronounced Wee-Bee-Log), a module designed to facilitate the creation and administration of public and private Weblogs. I have reservations about XOOPS, but it can be an excellent tool for a certain type of audience. In particular, the ease with which it can be installed and administered, and with which each user can be granted his or her own Weblog, is hard to beat.
XOOPS testifies to the power of the GNU General Public License, to the Open Source community and to the fact that not all forks or splits in an open-source project are bad. The XOOPS story begins with PHPNuke, a suite of programs written in PHP and using MySQL for its database back end. PHPNuke apparently was built on top of ThatWare, a now-abandoned Slash clone written in PHP.
What happened next is controversial, to say the least, and demonstrates what can happen when an open-source project gets ugly: a large number of PHPNuke contributors decided to fork the project and named their version PostNuke. Today, PHPNuke and PostNuke both exist, and little love is lost between the user and development communities. From what I can tell, and without examining the code in any depth, PHPNuke mainly continues to be developed by Francisco Burzi, with the main criticisms having to do with his management style, the hobbyist orientation of PHPNuke modules and issues having to do with security. Although PostNuke is quite popular and seems to have the edge on security, administration, commercial-oriented modules and database-independence, maintainers are accused of changing APIs too frequently and of designing PostNuke to be too resource-intensive. Meanwhile, some of the central PostNuke developers have left that project, forking it into software that originally was known as LostNuke and now goes by the name of Xaraya.
Finally, XOOPS seems (from what I can tell) to be an object-oriented rewrite of PHPNuke. The XOOPS maintainers believe that by rewriting the system to use objects, it is more secure and easier to develop and maintain.
The good news is that all of these systems are available under the GNU General Public License. That said, forks generally are seen as a last resort in the Open Source community—and the fact that so many have happened on this software probably testifies to the lack of strong management and leadership of these projects. Reviewing the history of these projects renewed my admiration for people like Linus Torvalds, Larry Wall and Guido von Rossum, all of whom have managed to keep their communities together, despite differences of opinion among the core developers.
XOOPS seems to have a smaller community than either PHPNuke or PostNuke. However, the number of built-in and third-party modules is quite large, and its object-oriented facilities mean it is fairly easy to build your own module. Indeed, although the number of modules has remained fairly modest, I was impressed by how easy it was to install. Does this mean you should use XOOPS over another one of the Nuke-alikes? That seems to depend as much on politics and your planned use as on the technology itself, although the fact that XOOPS uses objects does give it an edge, at least in theory, from my experience.
Now that we have reviewed the historical evolution of XOOPS and related pieces of software, let's set up our own XOOPS server. In order to run XOOPS, you need a MySQL server—I am running the admittedly old version of 3.23.58 on my workstation—and a copy of Apache (version 1 or 2) with PHP installed.
Installing XOOPS is one of the most impressive and painless software installs I have done in a long time. I downloaded the code from the XOOPS Web site (see the on-line Resources section) and opened up the .tar.gz file in a temporary directory. I then copied the entire HTML subdirectory into my Apache content root, as /usr/local/apache/html/xoops. Once I had done that, I was able to access the XOOPS installer at the URL /xoops on my system.
The installer is fully Web-based and walks you through the process slowly but surely. The most confusing part probably was the page on which you need to enter the user name and password of a MySQL user who is authorized to create a new database and tables. The installer also could be a bit more verbose in its error messages at this initial phase, given that many people installing XOOPS are unlikely to be experienced Web/database programmers.
That said, the installation was fairly simple and painless. I returned to the /xoops URL on my system and was greeted with a simple introductory screen that invited me to log in. I logged in as the site administrator, and although the main screen was relatively blank, I was able to move quickly to the Administration menu on the left side of the screen (Figure 1).
Administering XOOPS is fairly straightforward, once you understand that everything in XOOPS is a module. The first order of business for most XOOPS administrators then is to install additional modules. Go to the Administration menu and choose Modules. The top of the screen lists the modules already installed, and the bottom of the screen lists those available but uninistalled.
To install an available module, click on the appropriate icon next to the module's name. After you confirm your choice, you should see an indication of which tables are being created in the MySQL database, what access permissions have been added to the system and whether the module was installed correctly. Assuming that it was, you can return to the Module Administration page, where you should see the newly installed module at the top of the screen rather than at the bottom.
The default layout of a XOOPS site is rather empty. To include additional items on the home page, you must go to the Blocks administrative page, which lists the content features each module includes. The News module includes three blocks—bigstory, topics and top. The main Blocks Administration menu lets the site manager indicate which blocks are visible. But the real power happens in the Edit menu associated with each block, allowing you to indicate where on the screen the block should appear—on the side, in the center or somewhere else entirely.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Google's Abacus Project: It's All about Trust
- Seeing Red and Getting Sleep
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Fancy Tricks for Changing Numeric Base
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Introduction
- Working with Command Arguments
- Secure Desktops with Qubes: Installation
- CentOS 6.8 Released
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Linux Mint 18
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide