Centralized Authorization Using a Directory Service, Part II
Authorization is the process of deciding if entity X is allowed to have access to resource Y. Determining the identity of X is the job of the authentication process. One task of authorization in computer networks is to define and determine which user has access to which computers in the network. A simple example would be one line in a computer's /etc/passwd file, joe:X:1234:56:/home/joe:/bin/bash, to allow user joe access to this computer. If you want to give user joe access to several computers, you have to add this line to every computer's /etc/passwd file.
On Linux, the tendency exists to create a local account for each single user who should be allowed to log in to a computer. This typically is the case, because a user needs not only login privileges but also access to additional resources, such as a home directory to do some work. Creating a local account on every computer takes care of all this.
The problem with this local account approach is that these accounts can be inconsistent with one another. The same user name could have a different user ID and/or group ID on different computers. Even more problematic is when two different accounts share the same user ID and group ID on different computers. User joe on computer1 could have user ID 1234 and group ID 56, and user jane on computer2 could have the same user ID 1234 and group ID 56. This is a big security risk in cases where shared resources are used. These two different accounts are the same for an NFS server, so these users can wipe out each other's files.
The solution to this inconsistency problem is to have only one central, authoritative data source for this kind of information and a means of providing all your computers with access to this central source. This is what a directory service does. The two directory services most widely used for centralizing authorization data are the network information service (NIS, formerly known as yellow pages or YP) and lightweight directory access protocol (LDAP).
A few things need to be considered when it comes to deciding which directory service to use, NIS or LDAP. If your company already maintains an LDAP server, it seems simple enough to add the authorization data to it. However, usually company LDAP servers are used for white pages and similar fairly lightweight tasks. Adding the authorization task puts a significant load on an LDAP server, because every single lookup for user name, UID, GID and so on done by programs needs to be answered by it. It usually makes sense to add an additional LDAP server dedicated solely to authorization. Also, due to the many different kinds of directory queries, it is rather hard to get the performance tuning right. You need to add all necessary LDAP index definitions in your slapd.conf file in order to speed up common lookups, but you don't want to add too many index definitions. Doing so makes the LDAP back-end database files large, and everything slows down again.
LDAP is the better choice in networks that have problems with many dropped UDP packets, because it uses TCP/IP where retransmits are built into the network protocol layer. NIS, on the other hand, uses remote procedure calls (RPCs) over UDP. Every dropped packet results in a non-answered NIS query, and the NIS client needs to repeat the query. Use the command netstat -s -u at different times on different machines on your network to see whether your network suffers from this problem. You should see very few errors reported by this command.
I concentrate on NIS in this article, because it is easier to start out with and there is a fairly simple migration path to LDAP in case you see problems. PADL Software Pty, Ltd., provides a set of open-source tools to help you convert all your NIS data files to LDAP (see the on-line Resources). You still have to do the performance-tuning part, however. You have to write migration tools yourself if you want to migrate from LDAP to NIS.
An NIS server does not require a lot of hardware resources. Any machine you have around should do the job. You might want to put this new functionality on a dedicated machine, though. At the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC), we serve, without any problems, up to 500 Linux and Solaris clients with one old Sun Netra T1 server. We have four of these NIS servers for about 700 Solaris and Linux desktop computers and another six NIS servers for about 2,500 Solaris and Linux compute servers. Our clients are spread out somewhat unevenly over the servers.
Log on to the machine where you want to install your master NIS server, and make sure the latest portmap, ypserv and yp-tools RPMs are installed. If not, download and install them now. All following commands have to be issued as root. Start the portmapper dæmon with:
# service portmap start
The next step is to define the name of your new NIS domain. This name can be anything you like, but it probably makes sense to pick one that represents your department inside your company; nis.example.com for an NIS domain for all of Example.Com or eng.example.com for the Engineering department inside of Example.Com would be good choices.
Set the NIS domain name on your master server with the command:
# domainname nis.example.com
You also have to add the line:
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Rogue Wave Software's Zend Server
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide