VLANs on Linux
To begin, we must have a more formal definition of what a LAN is. LAN stands for local area network. Hubs and switches usually are thought of as participating in a single LAN. Normally, if you connect two computers to the same hub or switch, they are on the same LAN. Likewise, if you connect two switches together, they are both on the same LAN.
A LAN includes all systems in the broadcast domain. That is, all of the systems on a single LAN receive a broadcast sent by any member of that LAN. By this definition, a LAN is bordered by routers or other devices that operate at OSI Layer 3.
Now that we've defined a LAN, what is a VLAN? VLAN stands for virtual LAN. A single VLAN-capable switch is able to participate in multiple LANs at once.
This functionality alone has a variety of uses, but VLANs become far more interesting when combined with trunking. A trunk is a single physical connection that can carry multiple VLANs. Each frame that crosses the trunk has a VLAN identifier attached to it, so it can be identified and kept within the correct VLAN.
Trunks can be used between two switches, between a switch and a router or between a switch and a computer that supports trunking. When connecting to a router or computer, each VLAN appears as a separate virtual interface.
When using trunks, it is important to consider that all the VLANs carried over the trunk share the same bandwidth. If the trunk is running over a 100Mbps interface, for example, the combined bandwidth of all the VLANs crossing that trunk is limited to 100Mbps.
VLANs provide a number of benefits to a network designer. The first advantage is the number of devices required to implement a given network topology can be reduced. Without VLANs, if your network design requires ten machines divided into five different LANs, you would need five different switches or hubs, and most of the ports would be wasted. With VLANs, this work could be done with one device.
Most routers and standard computers can support a limited number of physical network interfaces. Although dual and quad-port Ethernet adapters are available, these are expensive. For example, a quad-port Ethernet card may cost $400. VLAN capable switches start at around $500, but they support many more interfaces.
Depending on the scenario, VLANs and trunks can provide an effective way of segmenting a network without the expense and complexity of managing many physical interfaces.
Several trunk encapsulations are available. Trunks can be carried across a variety of interface types, but this article deals only with Ethernet. The two main protocols for carrying VLANs over Ethernet are ISL and 802.1q. ISL was created by Cisco prior to the standardization of 802.1q and is proprietary. 802.1q, on the other hand, is an open standard and is widely supported. Hereafter, references to trunking mean 802.1q-over-Ethernet. As a side note, 802.1q is defined on only 100Mbps or higher Ethernet; it does not support 10Mbps.
Trunks using the 802.1q protocol work by adding a 4-byte VLAN identifier to each frame. This is used on both ends to identify to which VLAN each individual frame belongs. When a switch receives a tagged unicast frame, it looks up the outgoing port using both the destination MAC address and the VLAN identifier. When a broadcast frame is received, it is flooded out to all active ports participating in that VLAN.
When a VLAN-aware router or computer receives a tagged frame, it examines the tag to determine to which virtual interface the frame belongs. This virtual interface can have an IP address and behaves basically the same as a normal physical interface.
Some switches have the concept of a native VLAN on a trunk connection. Packets sent out from the trunk port on this VLAN are untagged. Likewise, untagged packets received on this port are associated with this VLAN. Native VLANs on both ends of a trunk must match. A native-VLAN mismatch on the two ends of the trunk causes problems using the native VLAN configured on each end.
For all the benefits of VLANs and trunking, some risks must be weighed. As opposed to physical separation between network segments, VLANs rely on the switch to do the right thing. It is possible that a misconfiguration or a bug could cause the VLAN barriers to be broken.
Two risks are associated with VLANs. In the first, a packet leaks from one VLAN to another, possibly revealing sensitive information. In the second, a specially crafted packet is injected into another VLAN. Any attack that could cause the VLAN barriers to break requires a machine directly attached to the physical network. This means that only a local machine can execute an attack against the switch.
When the switch is configured properly, the chances of these problems happening are slim, but the possibility still exists. It is up to you to examine your needs and your security policy to determine if VLANs are right for you.
It is beyond the scope of this article to describe exactly how to configure your switch securely, but most vendors provide documentation outlining best practices. Briefly, you should configure at least the following:
Disable trunking and trunk negotiation on all ports except those absolutely necessary.
Enable MAC flood protection on all ports.
Isolate the management VLAN from workstations and servers.
|Using Django and MongoDB to Build a Blog||Mar 05, 2014|
|What virtualization solution do you use/manage at work?||Mar 04, 2014|
|Our Assignment||Mar 04, 2014|
|March 2014 Issue of Linux Journal: 20 Years of Linux Journal||Mar 03, 2014|
|Have Resume - Will Travel||Feb 28, 2014|
|March 2014 Video Preview||Feb 28, 2014|
- Using Django and MongoDB to Build a Blog
- Our Assignment
- Linux Systems Administrator
- Senior Perl Developer
- Technical Support Rep
- Sign Up to Win a Silicon Mechanics Swag Pack!
- Use the Bash trap Statement to Clean Up Temporary Files
- UX Designer
- Zato—Agile ESB, SOA, REST and Cloud Integrations in Python
- Have Resume - Will Travel
- You have to be careful there
1 week 2 days ago
- Wonder when LJ is going to
1 week 3 days ago
- Puerto Rico Free Software
1 week 4 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
- I hate voice commands
1 week 5 days ago
- usabilty --- AGAIN with this nonsense
1 week 5 days ago
- Don't make excuses
1 week 6 days ago
- Sorry to let you know, but
1 week 6 days ago
- Ridiculous statement. Not a
2 weeks 1 hour ago
2 weeks 5 hours ago