Making a Connection with tcpdump, Part II
Part I of this article discussed tcpdump, a command-line utility that sniffs network traffic. Now let's see what it can do.
Using tcpdump we can analyze the PDUs that establish and terminate a TCP/IP connection. TCP uses a special mechanism to open and close connections. The tcpdump output below display data from different connection scenarios between host 192.168.2.10 and 192.168.2.165. The following tcpdump command and options were used to generate output:
#tcpdump -nn host 192.168.2.165 and port 23
Before examining the output, let's take a detour and get a brief overview of TCP/IP connection management. This small detour will assist those individuals who are new to protocols. To guarantee a reliable connection (startup and shutdown), TCP uses a method in which three messages are exchanged. The process is called a three-way-handshake. To startup a connection:
The requesting Host sends a synchronization flag (SYN) in a TCP segment to create a connection.
The receiving Host 192.168.2.165 receives the SYN flag and returns an acknowledgment flag (ACK).
The requesting Host 192.168.2.10 receives the SYN flag and returns it's own ACK flag.
A similar handshake process is used to close a connection using a finish flag (FIN).
To establish a connection, the sending host creates a segment containing the IP address and port number of the host it want to connect to. The segment contains a SYN flag and the sending hosts initial sequence number. Data is segmented before it is sent. The sequence numbers allow the segments to be assembled in the correct order.
20:06:32.845356 192.168.2.10.1249 > 192.168.2.165.23: S 3263977215:3263977215(0) win 16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
The receiving hosts responds with its own SYN flag and its initial sequence number. This segment also contains an ACK flag to acknowledge the sending host's SYN (segment 3263977215 +1). This type of acknowledgment is called expectational acknowledgment, because the receiver acknowledges the sequence number of the next segment it expects to receive.
20:06:32.845725 192.168.2.165.23 > 192.168.2.10.1249: S 48495364:48495364(0) ack 3263977216 win 32120 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
The sending host acknowledges the SYN flag from the receiving host by sending another segment containing the . and ACK flags.
20:06:32.845921 192.168.2.10.1249 > 192.168.2.165.23: . ack 1 win 17520 (DF)
So far two flags, S and ., have been seen. There are five in total.
S: SYN (Synchronize sequence numbers - Connection establishment)
F: FIN (Ending of sending by sender - Connection termination)
R: RST (Reset connection)
P: PSH (Push data)
.: (No flag is set)
To terminate a connection, a segment containing a FIN flag is sent from host 192.168.2.165 back to the host with the open session.
20:07:32.916410 192.168.2.165.23 > 192.168.2.10.1249: F 147:147(0) ack 56 win 32120 (DF)
This may appear backwards, but trust me, it's not. Think of where the session is open--this is the point that is asking to close the connection. Host 192.168.2.10 acknowledges the FIN segment.
20:07:32.916680 192.168.2.10.1249 > 192.168.2.165.23: . ack 148 win 17374 (DF)
Then host 192.168.2.10 terminates it connection by sending a segment containing a FIN flag.
20:07:32.928907 192.168.2.10.1249 > 192.168.2.165.23: F 56:56(0) ack 148 win 17374 (DF)
Host 192.168.2.165 acknowledges the segment.
20:07:32.929121 192.168.2.165.23 > 192.168.2.10.1249: . ack 57 win 32120 (DF)
To establish a connection, host 192.168.2.10 sends a segment containing the IP address and port number of the host it want to connect to. The segment contains a SYN flag and the sending hosts initial sequence number.
05:28:00.080798 192.168.2.10.1063 > 192.168.2.165.23: S 3034008467:3034008467(0) win 16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
Host 192.168.2.165 acknowledges the SYN from host 192.168.2.10 by sending another segment containing the R (connection reset) and ACK flags.
05:28:00.080979 192.168.2.165.23 > 192.168.2.10.1063: R 0:0(0) ack 3034008468 win 0
Host doesn't take no for answer and tries again.
05:28:00.579420 192.168.2.10.1063 > 192.168.2.165.23: S 3034008467:3034008467(0) win 16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
But it receives the same result from receiving host.
05:28:00.579524 192.168.2.165.23 > 192.168.2.10.1063: R 0:0(0) ack 1 win 0
A final attempt is made to establish a connection.
05:28:01.080114 192.168.2.10.1063 &glt; 192.168.2.165.23: S 3034008467:3034008467(0) win 16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK> (DF)
Only three strikes in this ball game. Sending host gives up.
05:28:01.080225 192.168.2.165.23 > 192.168.2.10.1063: R 0:0(0) ack 1 win 0
Compare the outputs from an Establish Telnet Connection scenario and Telnet Connection Refusal scenario. The outputs from the receiving host are different. For the Telnet Connection Refusal scenario, the Telnet service was turned off at the receiving host using the /etc/inetd.conf file. If the service is not available, no connection can be established. Note to self: simple security measures turn off services not being used.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.View Now!
|The Firebird Project's Firebird Relational Database||Jul 29, 2016|
|Stunnel Security for Oracle||Jul 28, 2016|
|SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager||Jul 21, 2016|
|My +1 Sword of Productivity||Jul 20, 2016|
|Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!||Jul 19, 2016|
|Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)||Jul 18, 2016|
- Stunnel Security for Oracle
- The Firebird Project's Firebird Relational Database
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide