Software Freedom for Macedonia?
My trip was sponsored by the Macedonian magazine publication, [PCInfo+], and I was invited to speak at an event they called ExpoCom. This event was originally expanded to be a full week long. However, when it was announced I was coming to speak on software freedom, a number of vendors and speakers withdrew and ExpoCom was shortened by a few days. I learned this was because the Microsoft Adriatic representative and the local Microsoft reseller in Macedonia had contacted the speakers and vendors who were going to attend, and requested they withdraw from ExpoCom and offered other considerations if they would do so.
[PCInfo+] had at one time been a more traditional PC magazine much like [PC Week] or similar publications that cover proprietary software and hardware. When Igor become managing editor, and I think it was some two years ago, he focused attention and coverage on GNU/Linux, and the local hacker community. The immediate result of this was the Adriatic Microsoft rep asked their Macedonian reseller to stop future advertising in [PCInfo+.]
Very recently they had an amusing cover for PCInfo+ where they had a "Tux" penguin suck a "Microsoft" juicebox dry. This prompted the Microsoft Adriatic offices to phone each and every one of the local advertisers of [PCInfo+], and any that would withdraw from further advertising were offered "special" software licensing terms. Most recently, they had contacted the the printing house that [PCInfo+] uses. However, Igor will be telling his story for the world press directly, so I will leave it to him to fill in most of the details first hand.
I suppose in a country with a stronger civil history this would be scandalous. In fact, Macedonia has a poor history for enforcing laws and certainly, especially considering the short history of independence, less strong a connection between civil law and constitutional ideals than we enjoy here. Copyright, as a concept in Macedonia, is actually practiced somewhat on the French model. Authors have permanent and non-transferable "intellectual" rights, but can severably transfer "commercial" rights to others. In practice, actual enforcement on copyright restrictions has been very minimal in Macedonia to date.
With their low experience and civil history, there are many risks that they face. I was told that in Serbia, a separate and specific "software licensing" law was passed last year after much lobbying of that government which are neither based on constitutional, contractual, or civil law as it existed before. These laws permit private software companies to directly audit commercial firms in Serbia at will and permits the state to then close commercial businesses if the business is not in full software license, with "compliance" as defined by the firm initiating a software "audit". This also seems to be a slap to the concept of due process. There is some fear that similar laws may be passed in Macedonia.
As it was, ExpoCom was a much smaller and more intimate event than I had originally anticipated. It was held in a very small convention center. But, while most small Macedonian companies were discouraged from participating, many well known foreign companies unlikely to be effected by pressures choose to attend and present at it anyway. Most of these presentations were actually, for me, rather boring traditional marketing presentations. Most were, for me, somewhat boring, and I have little interest in mostly proprietary products or services from companies like Fujitsu and Assman.
My talk was at the end of the event, the "footnote", if you will. Even so, it was the most heavily attended presentation, even though I actually required the audience to actually think and ask questions rather than just listen to some slick video or slide presentation. I mostly spoke about software freedom and the right to study, and a little about GNU Bayonne. The audience was very receptive and much more energetic than I saw at the other presentations.
Later I had the chance to meet with a number of members of the Macedonian hacker community. I would say there are probably about 200 free software hackers in Macedonia as a whole, with the vast majority being in Skopje itself. While some Macedonian hackers are are in similar circumstances and viewpoint to many we have in the US who work part or full time in various commercial companies, a vast majority of Macedonian hackers are under 20, and perhaps a majority are under 18. It is this latter group which is most visibly prevalent and highly cohesive. I think the small size, uniformity of experience, and geographical proximity (being in one city) of Macedonian hackers accounts for this uniformity of viewpoint and goals and high level of social integration that they share.
Among this group of Macedonian hackers is Angov Arangel. While I would never suggest getting in a car with him, as such cars seem to have a natural tendency to crash into other cars even though he never drives, he is involved in getting this Macedonian hacker community together under a new Macedonian national Free Software organization. This organization was originally going to be formed and announced during ExpoCom itself, but they had not completed everything necessary by that date.
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- Interview with Patrick Volkerding
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Tech Tip: Really Simple HTTP Server with Python
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Returning Values from Bash Functions
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide