Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal
I have very little confidence that Lindows will be able to run many of the newer Windows application using any type of OS emulation. Windows is just too BIG. Not to mention that MS patches the OS almost weekly. Historically, good OS emulation is at best, only nearly impossible.
Hardware emulation, i.e. VMWare, is usually the best solution when trying to run software for other operation systems. Of course this would require having the MS OS, which really defeats the purpose of purchasing LindowsOS as an alterative to Windows.
Personally, I think packages like StarOffice are the best route. I can read and write MS Office documents, and the apps are more than adequate for my personal needs. The only problem is that StarOffice doesn't really "fit in" at work.
My real hope for LindowsOS is that it will be a descent desktop OS in it's own right. Leveraging Linux's large selection of hardware support gives Lindows an advantage over some other alternative OS offerings.
The general impression I got from the Lindows.com web site goes something like this:
Here is something really cool! If you pay us $99 we will let you be a Beta tester, and then you can see what it looks like! Oh yeah, and most of the code we are using was written by people who aren't going to get paid a dime. Have a nice day.
Frankly the experience felt like an infomercial minus the money back guarranty. I'm not a huge fan of Billy-G, but I can usually get MS Betas for free just by signing up.
If Mr. Robertson's intentions truly are as altruistic as he would have us believe, He should give something back to the Linux community.
Oh, I saw someone comment about how window (the kind you look through) manufacturers should be able to sue MS, if MS can sue Lindows for trademark infringment. Sorry, that's not how it works. Physical windows on your house, car, or whatever have nothing to do with operating systems. Also, due to the fact that window is a generic term when refering to glass things that people look through, no window manufacturer can have a window product trademarked as Windows. On the other hand, Windows as an OS name, is definately a word one would associate specifically with MS, ala trademark.
The problem is that MS lets other companies infringe upon their trademark without legal reprecussions. So why is MS singling out LindowsOS? Well, the answer should be obvious.
Is Lindows just another upstart like Winlinux? Or an emulator like Samba? Who knows? Spending $99 for a beta is not cool! Anyone out there ever done a comparison of win/lin emulaters?
Well, Lindows isn't even a new software development at all.
Just try this with Your Lindows copy:
2. open a console
3. useradd [new user]
4. passwd [new user]
5. enter new password
6. log out
7. log in as [new user]
Lindows is just a Debian Distro with altered logos and buttons. They compiled WINE, added some shell scripts for ms office installation and binded EXE-Files to be run with WINE - that's all.
This fact shows us Lindows is nothing more than vaporware.
3. useradd >
4. passwd >
7. log in as >
Just some updated info like in the subject line Lindows is using WINE and there is now talk of WINE going to the LGPL -- until now it had not been.
There have already been plenty of non-profit groups doing a lot of good work on Windows emulation (wine, etc.), there have been companies that use and also contribute back to those same organizations (redhat, corel, etc.), there are at least a couple of good, solid proprietary emulators out there (VMWare)
then there there are companies like "Lindows" cashing in on hype and contributing nothing...
FIrst of all to start with MS does not own the words windows or else they may have to sue people upto pre-historic times for using windows in their houses!!!!
Secondly, even in computers X-windows for Unix have been around even before MS launched WIn3.1 so on their own lines they should be sued first.
Thirdly, on the same lines MS-DOS can be considered as duplication (with all features removed for dummies) of Unix shell.
So who is voilating what? Seem to bring up the good question!!
I am now a Lindows Insider, paid 99 but I'll get first dibs on the preview releases and I'm hoping a discount on the final product...
If Microsoft is taking legal action, they're taking it seriously. Personally the thought of being able to run all my Windows software on a OS as stable as Linux AND get it for only $99, is a great one. Bring it on Lindows!
ok, so my understanding before this article was that lindows would have an advanced wine implemtation built in.... since(i believe) wine is gpled, if lindows used wine, any lindows improvements on wine must be OPEN SOURCE.... same with linux, any linux improvement are open source too....so back to the analogy of apple and darwin..... lindows is osX, darwin is linux.....lindows will use linux as its core, but add non-open source software on top of linux to give it the windows compatability. much the same way apple used darwin to give apple the core and keep its top layer of closed source software.
that make any sense?
Wine is not GPL'ed, but has "an X-style license" (whatever that means...). The license can be found at: http://www.winehq.com/source/LICENSE
As far as I understood, you are not obliged to redistribute changes you make to the wine sources.
From the lindows.com website:
"Lindows.com respects all applicable licensing and is proud to be a strong supporter of the Open Source community by helping to advance several Open Source initiatives. Coming soon to this page will be information, links and resources for obtaining source code and licensing information for any applicable software."
Tomas Beaujean (a.k.a. The Man in Black)
This sounds incredibly stupid (the lawsuit) along the lines of McDonald's suing a European (?) chain starting up called McChina. They lost. Microsoft does not own anything that sounds like windows ... otherwise the millions of window manufacturers would have to go back and sue Microsoft for using a name that could confuse consumers with the glass things people stick in the walls of their homes and businesses. Sounds stupid, doesn't it. That's what this Lindows lawsuit is. Would it be any less of a lawsuit if they chose Winnux instead of Lindows? Of course not ... it's the rip roaring Redmond machine in action is all.
Personally, I'm curious to see what comes of Lindows ... even though I agree so far that it's vaporware - even with the two screenshots on their website. If they have screenshots, why not issue a pre-alpha sample of it? It would 'appear' to at least work well enough to run the Office suite based on those shots. Only time will tell.
Oh wait ... I have to toss in the mandatory Linux-lover's cry of "WHY ISN'T IT GPL??" "I WON'T pay for software - it should all be free!" [end sarcasm] Come on people ... there is no free lunch. If you think so, tell your boss you'll now work for free ... and see how long you keep your car, your home, etc. Get real. Take what you can get free, be glad for it, and pay for the things you need just like the rest of the real world has to.
You're making a common mistake about the GPL and what it says. When you say software released under GPL is free, you need to think free speech, not free beer. The GPL software is completly YOURS. You can change it, copy it, and yes, SELL IT FOR MONEY. Otherwise Red Hat, Mandrake, SUSE and other distributions wouldn't exist. (and in case you're wondering, Red Hat is posting profits , so everyone there is selling GPL software and keeping their car and house etc.)
GPL allows knowledgable people to know what they are buying, by being able to examine the code.
Would you buy a car with it's hood sealed, so you couldn't see the engine and you were legally prevented from checking your oil or inflating your tires ? No ? well that's what you are doing when you buy non GPL software like MS products.
GPL IS REAL, it's real software produced by real profitable businesses.
The biggest obstacle is people who never bother to actually learn what GPL actually says.
That is not a fair analogy. The engine in the car has patented technology. With any operating system, you can do the equivalent of checking the oil or inflating the tires which would be equivalent to system tools.
Whether or not GPL works is another question altogether. In the Enterprise / Corporate market, companies pay alot of money for support, so the GPL model may indeed work such as in the case of RedHat. But in the Consumer market, how many consumers actually pay for support of the operating system? Very few. The two newest up and comers for Linux for the desktop consumer pc market are Xandros and Lindows.
None of the four, obviously. A lawsuit, especially if it makes it into the nightly news repeatedly, is incredible advertising, the kind only tons of money -and- tons of luck can buy.
How is Lindows with linux -not- like MacOS X with darwin? Both Lindows and MacOS X have large proprietary components, and both linux and darwin are opensource. If Apple had much sense, they'd forget about darwin and use linux, but that's another story. But if Apple made this smart move, then they'd be in much the same boat as Lindows.com!
Sure, I'm disappointed that lindows.com probably won't be giving (what I presume will be) their improvements on wine back to the community, but I have one lonely windows app I really want to run, it doesn't work with wine, and if LindowsOS will run it, I'll be ecstatic. And don't you have to expect software hoarding if you don't use a license like the GPL? Is there really anything wrong with a company coming along and exploiting what was probably not a very good license choice?
If someone comes along and does a LindowsOS-like project that's fully GPL'd, and works as well or better than LindowsOS, they'll win my allegiance away from lindows.com. But until then, lindows.com might be my only way of running my app without funding microsoft's death grip on the industry.
FWIW, there is an existing commercial system which will run 90% of Windows applications. It's called Win4Lin. Unfortunately, it still forces you to use a Win9x desktop (in a window or fullscreen) but it is stable. Plus, Windows boots in a minute or two. In my experience, it has proven to be more stable than Windows on a real PC. Go figure... I'm not sure of the current cost as I 'got in' during the beta stage. Anyhow, try http://www.netraverse.com