The Bazaar Way to Bet

Linux—more popular than Jesus? According to Google's authoritative search engine—yes.

If Google isn't already the number one search engine, it might as well be. What else is there? Even Yahoo gave up and started OEMing Google a few months back. They've got 10,000-plus Linux boxes sending out bots that crawl over 1.3 billion pages and bring back results so complete that every page is cached in searchable form. They're also on top of images and Usenet groups in a huge way, even though they hardly publicize either while they continue (at this writing) to tweak the systems publicly as beta.

Advertising on Google has more in common with your newspaper's classifieds than with anything on billboards, magazines or TV screens. This observation is meant as flattery. They are about the only form of advertising that enjoys positive demand, which means Google stands a chance of becoming the first outfit to create a form of web-based advertising that users welcome—no mean feat if they pull it off.

Their search results are relevanced (how's that for a neoverb?) by inbound links rather than by clever metatags and other sneaky HTML hacks on the searched pages. If anything, Google measures authority more than anything else. Since linking isn't an automatic matter with most text processing software, it takes a conscious effort for an author to point. Therefore, Google's thinking (roughly) goes, every link to a page is a vote by an interested human being for the value of the pointed-to page as a source.

Google calls its system “a unique combination of hardware and software”. Specifically, it's ten thousand boxes running Linux. We all know the technical answer to the “Why Linux?” question. There's an obvious economic one too: it's cheap to deploy on commodity hardware. More importantly, it lowers the threshold of deployment. It was easier for Google's creators to imagine the service running on Linux than on anything else. But finally, Google provides a democratic answer with its own search results.

See, in addition to ranking search results, Google also lists the number of unique pages found to contain the search term (or terms). When I looked a few minutes ago (when putting together the LJ Index, where these sort of numbers are also posted), Google found 31.6 million pages containing the word “linux”. Let's put this in perspective:

  • active x: 2,350,000

  • python: 2,080,000

  • gates: 3,020,000

  • kde: 3,560,000

  • gnome: 3,720,000

  • perl: 7,650,000

  • jesus: 8,800,000

  • boy: 10,800,000

  • solution: 13,300,000

  • market:31,200,000

  • girl: 13,600,000

  • microsoft: 20,200,000

  • god: 24,300,000

  • sun: 25,500,000

  • sex: 28,400,000

  • linux: 31,600,000

  • business: 86,900,000

  • have: 231,000,000

  • naked:8,080,000

  • Tcl:1,910,000

  • foobar: 113,000

  • hampster dance:8,930

On that last one, the top two (out of 231 million) were LinuxGames.com and Richard Stallman's Why Software Should Not Have Owners page.

If markets are conversations, what does this say about the Linux market? Is this market—our bazaar—really bigger than sex and Microsoft?

Apparently.

Why? Because there's a lot to talk about and keep talking about; because it constantly changes. No matter how important Microsoft continues to make itself (by expertly leveraging its incumbent importance), the company's protectiveness about its intellectual property puts a lid on the quantity of Microsoft subjects one can talk about.

There is a limit to how deeply one can enjoy expertise in—or involvement with—Microsoft software. Where a significant hunk of Microsoft intellectual property is nobody's business, all of Linux is anybody's business.

Which means Linux, as a topic of expertise, is better for business than Microsoft, or any other commercial software company that limits conversation around the very software on which it wants everybody to depend.

This is what we need to remember when we speculate about the viability of Linux companies. A lot of them got clobbered in the dot-com bust, along with everybody else. If we want to put our trust in market forces, it's pretty hard to ignore one of the world's biggest conversations.

Doc Searls is senior editor of Linux Journal and coauthor of The Cluetrain Manifesto. His next book will be Real Markets: What They Are and How They Work.

______________________

Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal

Webinar
One Click, Universal Protection: Implementing Centralized Security Policies on Linux Systems

As Linux continues to play an ever increasing role in corporate data centers and institutions, ensuring the integrity and protection of these systems must be a priority. With 60% of the world's websites and an increasing share of organization's mission-critical workloads running on Linux, failing to stop malware and other advanced threats on Linux can increasingly impact an organization's reputation and bottom line.

Learn More

Sponsored by Bit9

Webinar
Linux Backup and Recovery Webinar

Most companies incorporate backup procedures for critical data, which can be restored quickly if a loss occurs. However, fewer companies are prepared for catastrophic system failures, in which they lose all data, the entire operating system, applications, settings, patches and more, reducing their system(s) to “bare metal.” After all, before data can be restored to a system, there must be a system to restore it to.

In this one hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for better disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible bare-metal recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.

Learn More

Sponsored by Storix