9-10: Industry Standard from Alexa Internet, March 2001
11-12: Gartner Group
At the NBA's first three-point shooting contest, Larry Bird looked at his opponents in the locker room and said, “Who's playing for second?” That's the main question when it comes to Linux distros. Red Hat has had the Larry Bird position for years now, and about all that's changed is who comes after #1.
Recently Evans Data Corporation of Santa Cruz, California asked 300 Linux developers which distributions they would select for a web server or a web application server. The obvious answer was Red Hat. Coming in second were SuSE and Mandrake, each with 21.8%. As the chart shows, though, the question for developers really is “Who would you select in addition to Red Hat?” The average number of additional choices was 1.3 (for a total of 2.3 choices). Caldera, Debian and FreeBSD weren't far behind SuSE and Mandrake.
The survey's table of contents is on the Web at Evan's site (www.evansdata.com/Linux01TOC.htm).
Between truth and the search for truth, I opt for the second.
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.
Honesty is the best policy. If you can fake that, you've got it made.
A closed mouth gathers no foot.
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power.
The strategic goal here is getting Windows CE standards into every device we can. We don't have to make money over the next few years. We didn't make money on MS-DOS in its first release. If you can get into this market at $10, take it.
Do we have a way for people who host web sites on Linux to build on [.NET]? Yes, we do. That's not to say our overall strategy is not to get those web sites over to Windows, but we will provide a way for those Linux servers to use .NET.
I'm not one of those who think Bill Gates is the devil. I simply suspect that if Microsoft ever met up with the devil, it wouldn't need an interpreter.
Storage is like eating. You can eat cheaper, but you can't not eat.
—Colin Ferenbach, on prospects for the storage firm EMC
It's a great year for entrepreneurs. The problem is that VCs haven't been investing in entrepreneurs, they've been investing in figureheads with no technology.
The only thing you can't do with open-source software is make monopoly profits.
The first thing that happened after we opened sourced InterBase was customers wanted to know how much it cost. The most important new feature, after open sourcing, was the price tag.
At least, thanks to open source, the technology doesn't die with the company.
Hey, for the price of a distribution, you can have a year of Linux Journal.
—Evil Bastard, on OpenSourceRadio
People who whine that Linux user groups exist to “help” people invariably use proprietary mailers.
For every traction there is an equal and opposite retraction.
What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite.
Nobody can jump to confusions faster than the Linux community.
The right way to do things is not to try to persuade people you're right but to challenge them to think it through for themselves.
all your apt-get arebelong to us. dist-upgradenow for great honour
—Debian Haiku by Marc Merlin
So, how often do people search for your name on Google? To find out, we made an ad on Google's AdWords page, then asked Google to estimate how many times a month we would have to pay to run it when users searched for each of the following names:
Larry Augustin: 0
Chris DiBona: 0
Phil Hughes: 0
Rob Malda: 0
Don Marti: 4,000
Rick Moen: 0
Bruce Perens: 0
Eric Raymond: 4,000
Doc Searls: 0
Richard Stallman: 0
Linus Torvalds: 1,300
Richard Vernon: 0
Bob Young: 0
And, of course, we tried it for operating systems too:
There is no charge to get estimates. Try it yourself at http://adwords.google.com/. There is no charge to get estimates.
Doc Searls is Senior Editor of Linux Journal
Practical Task Scheduling Deployment
July 20, 2016 12:00 pm CDT
One of the best things about the UNIX environment (aside from being stable and efficient) is the vast array of software tools available to help you do your job. Traditionally, a UNIX tool does only one thing, but does that one thing very well. For example, grep is very easy to use and can search vast amounts of data quickly. The find tool can find a particular file or files based on all kinds of criteria. It's pretty easy to string these tools together to build even more powerful tools, such as a tool that finds all of the .log files in the /home directory and searches each one for a particular entry. This erector-set mentality allows UNIX system administrators to seem to always have the right tool for the job.
Cron traditionally has been considered another such a tool for job scheduling, but is it enough? This webinar considers that very question. The first part builds on a previous Geek Guide, Beyond Cron, and briefly describes how to know when it might be time to consider upgrading your job scheduling infrastructure. The second part presents an actual planning and implementation framework.
Join Linux Journal's Mike Diehl and Pat Cameron of Help Systems.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- SUSE LLC's SUSE Manager
- My +1 Sword of Productivity
- Murat Yener and Onur Dundar's Expert Android Studio (Wrox)
- Managing Linux Using Puppet
- Non-Linux FOSS: Caffeine!
- Doing for User Space What We Did for Kernel Space
- SuperTuxKart 0.9.2 Released
- Parsing an RSS News Feed with a Bash Script
- Google's SwiftShader Released
- SourceClear Open
With all the industry talk about the benefits of Linux on Power and all the performance advantages offered by its open architecture, you may be considering a move in that direction. If you are thinking about analytics, big data and cloud computing, you would be right to evaluate Power. The idea of using commodity x86 hardware and replacing it every three years is an outdated cost model. It doesn’t consider the total cost of ownership, and it doesn’t consider the advantage of real processing power, high-availability and multithreading like a demon.
This ebook takes a look at some of the practical applications of the Linux on Power platform and ways you might bring all the performance power of this open architecture to bear for your organization. There are no smoke and mirrors here—just hard, cold, empirical evidence provided by independent sources. I also consider some innovative ways Linux on Power will be used in the future.Get the Guide