My dear faithful reader-fans who have survived my diverse ramblings since I first rambled way back in Computer Weekly circa 1956 will know that one of my most piquant threads has been of the psephological persuasion. As you know, psephology is the formal study of elections, apparently trivial but dripping with deep, dark paradoxes. There are endless papers in the MAA and AMS MathLit searching for the “perfect” electoral methodology. When voters are asked to record their “preferences”, it seems that the “normal” logical/algebraic relational laws break down. Thus, the transitive “A prefers B and B prefers C implies A prefers C” often fails when the total votes are counted (see Referecnes).
Or re-re-counted, to refer to the current (as I write in November 2000) Florida Presidential fiasco that will decide “the lesser of two weasels” as Jay Leno stated. My Brazilian correspondent, Rainer Brockerhoff, is alarmed/amused by the fact that the leading “wired” nation (aka “Fellow 'Mericans”) requires “hand counts” while the billions in Rio and São Paulo are “cast” electronically.
Apart from the quirks (popular vs. electoral college) of choosing the leader of the free-world, we are subjected to and influenced by statistically dubious polls daily.
I helped install/program IBM for George Gallup in the 1960s. The in-joke was the over loaded quiz: “Given the rampant inflation and unemployment, would you vote again for that Commie bastard Harold Wilson?”
Evans Data and similar “opinion” gatherers are more subtle, yet we need to be cautious. What if 39.78% (note the spurious accuracy) of developers say they are “scale 6 of 10” interested in “looking at C# when it's defined”?
Finally, as my last “Last Word”, I bid a fond Abschied.
I'll continue to promote the Linux agenda in my other columns.
Fast/Flexible Linux OS Recovery
On Demand Now
In this live one-hour webinar, learn how to enhance your existing backup strategies for complete disaster recovery preparedness using Storix System Backup Administrator (SBAdmin), a highly flexible full-system recovery solution for UNIX and Linux systems.
Join Linux Journal's Shawn Powers and David Huffman, President/CEO, Storix, Inc.
Free to Linux Journal readers.Register Now!
- The Italian Army Switches to LibreOffice
- Download "Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI"
- Linux Mint 18
- Oracle vs. Google: Round 2
- The FBI and the Mozilla Foundation Lock Horns over Known Security Hole
- Varnish Software's Varnish Massive Storage Engine
- Devuan Beta Release
- Ben Rady's Serverless Single Page Apps (The Pragmatic Programmers)
- Privacy and the New Math
Until recently, IBM’s Power Platform was looked upon as being the system that hosted IBM’s flavor of UNIX and proprietary operating system called IBM i. These servers often are found in medium-size businesses running ERP, CRM and financials for on-premise customers. By enabling the Power platform to run the Linux OS, IBM now has positioned Power to be the platform of choice for those already running Linux that are facing scalability issues, especially customers looking at analytics, big data or cloud computing.
￼Running Linux on IBM’s Power hardware offers some obvious benefits, including improved processing speed and memory bandwidth, inherent security, and simpler deployment and management. But if you look beyond the impressive architecture, you’ll also find an open ecosystem that has given rise to a strong, innovative community, as well as an inventory of system and network management applications that really help leverage the benefits offered by running Linux on Power.Get the Guide