klogd: The Kernel Logging Dæmon

klogd reads kernel log messages and helps process and send those messages to the appropriate files, sockets or users. This month we discuss memory address resolution and how to modify klogd's default behavior using command-line switches.

klogd reads kernel log messages and helps process and send those messages to the appropriate files, sockets or users. This month we discuss memory address resolution and how to modify klogd's default behavior using command-line switches.

The syslog dæmon takes messages sent through the syslog applications programming interface (the openlog, syslog and closelog library calls) and dispatches them to various files, sockets, users, pipes, or the bit-bucket (meaning a “discard”--any log message that doesn't match a selector in the syslog.conf file is discarded). Kernel messages, however, cannot use the syslog API.

The basic reason for this is that the syslog API is provided by the kernel itself. Code that can be called by itself is said to be “reentrant”. In order to be reentrant, a secondary call must have no effect on a prior call. If code makes any use of global or static variables, for example, it cannot be reentrant, since a change to a static variable in the secondary call will change it in the primary call.

Think about it this way: what would happen if a program were in the middle of a syslog call when the kernel needed to call the syslog function to report some kernel event? Unless the syslog call were totally reentrant, the kernel call would clobber the user-space call.

Many parts of the kernel are reentrant, either by being truly reentrant or through the use of selective locking. It would be very bad news indeed if a user-space program could block kernel execution merely by getting stuck in a system call. For this reason (among others), a very clean separation is maintained between the functions that kernel-space code may use and the code that user-space code may use. No kernel API function is dependent on the state of any user-space call (or, to be a bit more precise, those dependencies that exist are predictable and well understood). Thus, the kernel doesn't have to worry about what user-space programs are calling what user-space API functions from moment to moment. The kernel code may simply get on with business.

The kernel does, however, need a way to send messages to report abnormal situations, and, when debugging kernel layer code, to “see how far we got”. Thus, the kernel has its own logging API.

(For the curious, the user-space syslog call is provided by a function in the kernel called sys_syslog. The kernel syslog call is called printk. You can find the source code for both in your own copy of the Linux kernel source, which is more than likely to be in the /usr/src/linux directory on your system. Go ahead and look. Remember, it's your source!)

The kernel is built for simplicity and speed. Thus, the kernel's conception of logging is a bit more basic than that of syslog. Kernel messages are simple text with the convention that a priority of 0 to 7 will be encoded in <n> characters (where n is the priority, from 0 to 7) prefixed to the rest of the message text. The kernel logging API doesn't have the concept of a “facility” as syslogd does. Level 7 is the lowest priority and level 0 is the highest.

Sometimes, as when a protection fault occurs, the kernel logs contain memory addresses. The protection fault report from a Linux kernel isn't much use to anyone in debugging your problem, because kernels are almost certainly locally compiled. Even if you have never recompiled your kernel, the sheer number of distributions and versions of distributions out there makes it impossible for someone to help you with a raw protection fault log.

Fortunately, Linux kernels since 1.3.43 have reported addresses in a standard format. The klogd program recognizes that format and attempts to resolve addresses to symbol names so that one can actually find the object or code an address refers to. Later on, we'll cover how klogd does this.

These aspects of kernel messages (separate API, non-syslog attributes and memory address resolution) are the reason for a separate dæmon for kernel messages. There were (and are) patched versions of syslog that pick up kernel messages, but this practice is no longer popular, and with good reason. A clean separation of user-space and kernel-space features makes sense. If syslogd did some of these things, it would tie syslogd fairly tightly to the kernel version. Of course, klogd is bound fairly tightly, but this is considered much more acceptable, since it “encapsulates” this “dependent” code and then passes it on to a standard logging mechanism (syslogd).

So, what klogd does, basically, is read kernel log messages, transforms them slightly (by resolving kernel memory addresses to symbols) and then calls the user-space syslog API with the kernel facility and the priority as encoded in the kernel message. This is the dæmon's default behavior. Let's take a look at how the default behavior can be modified.

First off, klogd does not have a configuration file as syslogd does. Its behavior can be modified only through command-line switches and signals. We'll cover the switches first, then we'll discuss address resolution. Finally, we'll go over the signals to which klogd responds.

______________________

White Paper
Linux Management with Red Hat Satellite: Measuring Business Impact and ROI

Linux has become a key foundation for supporting today's rapidly growing IT environments. Linux is being used to deploy business applications and databases, trading on its reputation as a low-cost operating environment. For many IT organizations, Linux is a mainstay for deploying Web servers and has evolved from handling basic file, print, and utility workloads to running mission-critical applications and databases, physically, virtually, and in the cloud. As Linux grows in importance in terms of value to the business, managing Linux environments to high standards of service quality — availability, security, and performance — becomes an essential requirement for business success.

Learn More

Sponsored by Red Hat

White Paper
Private PaaS for the Agile Enterprise

If you already use virtualized infrastructure, you are well on your way to leveraging the power of the cloud. Virtualization offers the promise of limitless resources, but how do you manage that scalability when your DevOps team doesn’t scale? In today’s hypercompetitive markets, fast results can make a difference between leading the pack vs. obsolescence. Organizations need more benefits from cloud computing than just raw resources. They need agility, flexibility, convenience, ROI, and control.

Stackato private Platform-as-a-Service technology from ActiveState extends your private cloud infrastructure by creating a private PaaS to provide on-demand availability, flexibility, control, and ultimately, faster time-to-market for your enterprise.

Learn More

Sponsored by ActiveState