Simplified IP Addressing

A look at an easy way to figure out what those pesky IP addresses actually mean.
Subnetting on Non-Byte Boundaries

Let's say you are granted a full Class C suite of addresses, e.g., as your network address. You are allowed to assign the host addresses (the last byte) as you please. If you use the default Class C netmask of (see Table 5), you can assign host addresses of through on a single network. That's feasible of course, but you may want to break this up into multiple networks of perhaps 25 hosts each.

Let's do some mathematics. If we have 4 bits for hosts, will it be enough? 2<+>4<+>-2 = 14 and is not enough. So, let's use 5 bits for hosts: 2<+>5<+>-2 = 30 which will work. However, we have 8 bits in the last byte for hosts, so let's borrow three bits for subnetworks; then we still have the requisite 5 bits for hosts. Great, but how many subnets do we have? How about 2<+>3<+> = 8? We have, then, eight subnetworks with 30 host addresses on each. If you are doing the math, you are probably saying, “but 8x30 is only 240 addresses; what happened to the others?” Valid question! Oops, don't get sore, but it's time to construct another table. Note that each address will have the form of 210.168.94.last byte, and the SNM (sub-netmask) will have the form 255.255.255.last byte. Let's just work with the last byte.

Table 6

From Table 2 (or Table 1), we see the SNM will be The 224 comes from the last byte being 11100000. So what are the subnets? Table 6 shows them (last byte only).

Let's detail a few. First, take the smallest. The full subnetwork address of the smallest is The next one up is, and so on. Remember that with three bits to work with, we get 2<+>3<+> = 8 subnets, and looking at Table 6, you see them.

Table 7

Back to the question of why we get only 240 host addresses. “(Gasp)—another table!” Looking at the last byte, we get Table 7.

Now let's answer the question of what happened to the other addresses. To do this, tally all the “invalid addresses”, i.e., those that can't be used for host addresses.

First, we have eight subnets, each with a subnetwork address and a broadcast address. So we lose 8*2 = 16 addresses here. Now if we subtract these 16 from 256, we get 240 available host addresses.

Doing it the other way is much easier. We have eight subnetworks, each with 30 valid IP addresses; this gives us 8*30=240 valid IP addresses total, the magic number.

For fun, let's do one more thing: analyze the sixth subnetwork in a little more detail. The last byte is 10100000 binary or 160 decimal. The full subnet address is decimal, and we use an SNM of Remember, I said to take the subnet address, set all the host bits to 1s and add them to get the broadcast address. If we do this correctly, it should give the same result as Table 7.

We use five bits for host addresses, so the decimal value of the sixth bit is 32. Subtracting 1 gives 31. Thus, setting the five host bits to 1s, i.e., 00011111, gives a value of 31 decimal. Adding this to the last byte of the subnet address (160) gives 191 for the broadcast address, agreeing with Table 7. Here is the “whole Megillah”: The Sub-Network address210.168.94.161-190 Valid host addresses210.168.94.191 Directed Broadcast address

One final point. Some authors use the term “sub-netmask” even when referring to the default netmasks—they are being just a tad loose with their terms. Happy IP addressing, and remember, Linux is inevitable.

Gene E. Hector is an Assistant Professor at DeVry, Pomona. He holds B.S.E.E and M.S.S.E. degrees, is a Registered Professional Engineer and a Novell CNE. In recent years, he has been consulting and teaching. Aside from playing with his grandchildren and going on a few weekend trips to local mountain resorts with his wife Barbara, his hobby is Open Source Software (OSS) including Linux. Professor Hector can be reached by email at



Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


shaffiq.k.a's picture


Thanks for ur tutorial on ip addressing. It has never been so easy to grasp.I would appreciate simplified tutorials on all other topics of networking(cisco)from you.

Re: Linux Apprentice: Simplified IP Addressing

Anonymous's picture

Aclare' muchas de mis dudas con este articulo.

Antes de leer el articulo tenia unas dudas. Despues de la lectura entendi' muchas cosas 'oscuras' del asunto.

Honestamente, considero acertado el metodo que el autor aborda el tema: Las tablas dan una explicacion del 'como y porque'. Sobretodo, la parte de ``subnetting"

Manuel Kobashigawa

(mil disculpas. no escribo en ingles, mas entiendo -regular- la lectura)